SalarySwishSalarySwish

Blackhawks 2020-21 v2

Créé par: Petrock83
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 17 janv. 2020
Publié: 17 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Smith-Hickey Trade

NYI: Save 342,000 by replacing Hickey's buried contract with a Zack Smith buyout

CHI: Either makes the team as a reliable, veteran #6 defenseman, or costs negligibly more than a Smith buyout playing in Rockford.



And yes, I know a R. Strome might not be feasible and/or the best idea, but it's the only trade I've seen on here where we get rid of Nylander, and that's my primary goal.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
35 000 000 $
23 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
1750 000 $
15 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
57 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
Nick Holden
VGK
    Erik Gustafsson
    2.
    CHI
    1. Samuelsson, Mattias [Liste de réserve]
    Détails additionnels:
    Zach Bogosian
    BUF
    1. Krys, Chad
    Détails additionnels:
    Corey Crawford
    3.
    CHI
    1. Strome, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
    NYR
    1. Nylander, Alexander
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
    4.
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2021
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de MTL
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 500 000 $73 784 306 $1 090 244 $3 350 000 $9 715 694 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    880 833 $880 833 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    17 janv. 2020 à 19 h 25
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 3,455
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,624
    Isles could still use Hickey when he gets healthy. We already have 8 4th liners, don’t need another one.
    17 janv. 2020 à 19 h 25
    #2
    Kyle from Chicago
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2018
    Messages: 9,868
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,857
    I really don’t understand the obsession with getting rid of Nylander from all of the Hawks fans on here. The kid is 21(turning 22 in March) and is in the midst of his first NHL season, There are going to be learning curves. People are so obsessed with the trade that brought him here, and the hate the media cultivated around that trade and by proxy him, that they cannot handle that he is not a top 6 forward yet.

    Nylander is a project, and we knew that when we were acquiring him. It makes no sense to trade him now, while his value is probably lower than its ever been.
    17 janv. 2020 à 23 h 10
    #3
    Roviet_Sussia
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 509
    Mentions "j'aime": 118
    Modifié 17 janv. 2020 à 23 h 17
    Quoting: Stan_Bowman
    I really don’t understand the obsession with getting rid of Nylander from all of the Hawks fans on here. The kid is 21(turning 22 in March) and is in the midst of his first NHL season, There are going to be learning curves. People are so obsessed with the trade that brought him here, and the hate the media cultivated around that trade and by proxy him, that they cannot handle that he is not a top 6 forward yet.

    Nylander is a project, and we knew that when we were acquiring him. It makes no sense to trade him now, while his value is probably lower than its ever been.


    You've got to consider that Nylander was supposed to enter the team with an immediate impact (hence starting on the top line at the beginning of the season) and he hasn't really provided that. He's not going to get anything from going down to Rockford; that's part of the reason he wanted to get moved out of BUF and took a shot at their hockey club in the media.

    If bailing on him now means acquiring someone like Ryan Strome, I'd do it. The only thing is that I can't imagine NYR are shopping him hard considering what he's done for them.
    Petrock83 a aimé ceci.
    17 janv. 2020 à 23 h 39
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 1,519
    Mentions "j'aime": 656
    Quoting: Warrior24
    Isles could still use Hickey when he gets healthy. We already have 8 4th liners, don’t need another one.


    I think the Isles would accept this only if they would buy Smith out immediately. He's blocked on the depth chart by Pelech, Toews, Leddy, and Aho, so unless two of them get moved, I think saving that cap space might be more useful. Just my thought.
    17 janv. 2020 à 23 h 41
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 1,519
    Mentions "j'aime": 656
    Quoting: Stan_Bowman
    I really don’t understand the obsession with getting rid of Nylander from all of the Hawks fans on here. The kid is 21(turning 22 in March) and is in the midst of his first NHL season, There are going to be learning curves. People are so obsessed with the trade that brought him here, and the hate the media cultivated around that trade and by proxy him, that they cannot handle that he is not a top 6 forward yet.

    Nylander is a project, and we knew that when we were acquiring him. It makes no sense to trade him now, while his value is probably lower than its ever been.


    I'm not trading him because he isn't a top 6 forward right now, I'm trading him because, based on what I've seen, he never will be. I think we should sell on him ASAP before his value depreciates anymore. You can call him a project, but, despite his age, I don't think he has any more to show than he already has and I think he will remain in that ambiguous zone of being skilled, but not smart enough/not enough effort put in to become the speedy playmaker they want him to be.
    Voir tout