SalarySwishSalarySwish

What is Gustafssons worth

Créé par: Xmarshldillon
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 18 nov. 2019
Publié: 18 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I feel like it's a prospect and a second but I would like to hear other opinions.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $66 801 686 $0 $6 707 500 $14 698 314 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

18 nov. 2019 à 16 h 35
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,683
Mentions "j'aime": 9,837
I am a Hawks fan. I know that he's an offensive defenseman. He's also back to his level of play from last year. Admittedly, there was a dip earlier in the year, but it's been widely reported that it was a systematic change that affected the Hawks play as a team and not any individualistic effort or lack thereof. What that means is that his value isn't quite what it was last year. That dip happened, but if he continues to play the way he has the last few games he can be a difference maker for a playoff caliber team.

There are a couple of things that definitely go in his favor. Literally every team in the NHL can afford his cap hit. So teams like Vegas or TOR or BOS or AZ can easily take his cap. This matters because not every team can take on a Mike Green even at 50% retained. Theoretically this should help drive up his TDL price tag.

I'd tend to agree with you that a 2nd and prospect is about right. "prospect" is pretty vague though. A 2nd and an A prospect or 1st and B prospect. If his play decreases then we need to look at recent TDL history to see that many 7th dmen went for 3rd rounders...so a 2nd might be right and an AHL player.
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
18 nov. 2019 à 17 h 35
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: exo2769
I am a Hawks fan. I know that he's an offensive defenseman. He's also back to his level of play from last year. Admittedly, there was a dip earlier in the year, but it's been widely reported that it was a systematic change that affected the Hawks play as a team and not any individualistic effort or lack thereof. What that means is that his value isn't quite what it was last year. That dip happened, but if he continues to play the way he has the last few games he can be a difference maker for a playoff caliber team.

There are a couple of things that definitely go in his favor. Literally every team in the NHL can afford his cap hit. So teams like Vegas or TOR or BOS or AZ can easily take his cap. This matters because not every team can take on a Mike Green even at 50% retained. Theoretically this should help drive up his TDL price tag.

I'd tend to agree with you that a 2nd and prospect is about right. "prospect" is pretty vague though. A 2nd and an A prospect or 1st and B prospect. If his play decreases then we need to look at recent TDL history to see that many 7th dmen went for 3rd rounders...so a 2nd might be right and an AHL player.


Spot on
Voir tout