SalarySwishSalarySwish

Complete re-tool

Créé par: gregb569
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 26 juin 2019
Publié: 26 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
All signings done using https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15E1qqh3OfHvvhbv_pICfKT7VR1jJEVhWQOyKviWLN54/edit#gid=707766415
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
21 367 908 $
22 538 159 $
21 600 911 $
21 268 315 $
1729 829 $
1778 569 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
37 408 595 $
32 796 060 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
Détails additionnels:
OTT likely moves up in the draft 10-20 spots to take on Johnson
OTT
  1. Johnson, Jack
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Pittsburgh gets rid of Johnsons contract
2.
PIT
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Thinking with drafting Byram Zadorov could become expendable? On the left side they have Byram, Girard and Cole still under contract.
COL
  1. Hörnqvist, Patric
Détails additionnels:
COL has ample cap space, proven 20+ goal guy/playoff performer who can add great secondary to a team lacking in that area.
3.
PIT
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Rust, Bryan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
4.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $77 862 448 $132 500 $2 850 000 $3 637 552 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
1 367 908 $1 367 908 $
AD
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
7 408 595 $7 408 595 $
AD
UFA - 3
2 796 060 $2 796 060 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 268 315 $1 268 315 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
2 538 159 $2 538 159 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 600 911 $1 600 911 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

26 juin 2019 à 12 h 1
#1
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,617
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
I could live with this except for Colorado trade. Hornqvist would bring in more value. Also swap Bjugstad for Gudbranson and just try to get something for him.
26 juin 2019 à 12 h 16
#2
gregb569
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,296
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: Missouri
I could live with this except for Colorado trade. Hornqvist would bring in more value. Also swap Bjugstad for Gudbranson and just try to get something for him.


I don't know what Hornqvists trade value is tbh. He's still an above average contributor, but health issues on that long term contract may scare off teams. My logic; top 4D for Top 6 winger. Picks could be added to even out the value I suppose.
I don't even mind Guds, ideally he'd be replaced with a cheaper option though. I know it's probably not going to happen signing Pavelski but if that happened there's no need for Jugs. I'd rather the 4 wingers in the top 6 over him anyway.

If we traded Guds I'd take a run at a UFA D like Hainsey, Stralman, Benn or Chiarot.
26 juin 2019 à 13 h 38
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
way to much and long for Jopa
He's already 34.
Puljujärvi is described in edmonton as "lacking work ethic" how you think that's going to work out? I'd pass.
26 juin 2019 à 14 h 31
#4
gregb569
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,296
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: pharrow
way to much and long for Jopa
He's already 34.
Puljujärvi is described in edmonton as "lacking work ethic" how you think that's going to work out? I'd pass.


Since Pavelski has turned 30 he averages 32goals/69pts per year. Pretty damn good. 3x7.5 is not bad at all for that production, not to mention hes a good playoff performer and has great advanced analytics.

Puljujärvi is 21 and definitely needs a change of scenery, I'd gamble Rust for a guy who I believe has a ton of upside. We can replace rust, if Puljujärvi reaches the ceiling a lot of people think he has he'll be 2x the player rust is. To me it's a worthwhile chance to take
26 juin 2019 à 18 h 53
#5
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,617
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: gregb569
I don't know what Hornqvists trade value is tbh. He's still an above average contributor, but health issues on that long term contract may scare off teams. My logic; top 4D for Top 6 winger. Picks could be added to even out the value I suppose.
I don't even mind Guds, ideally he'd be replaced with a cheaper option though. I know it's probably not going to happen signing Pavelski but if that happened there's no need for Jugs. I'd rather the 4 wingers in the top 6 over him anyway.

If we traded Guds I'd take a run at a UFA D like Hainsey, Stralman, Benn or Chiarot.


Yeah, I feel the same on Hornqvist. Guds I am fine with, just not that contract. Pavelski yes is very unlikely but it would be great for us!!

I think Stralman might cost to much. Hainsey would fit nice with the system (since he knows it)

If no Jugs then maybe sign another decent cheap winger to go on 3rd line. Like possibly: Perry, Noesen, Aberg, or bring back Archibald or Kunitz!
Voir tout