SalarySwishSalarySwish

New Found Cap

Créé par: Icarus
Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 15 mai 2019
Publié: 15 mai 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
With Kes getting surgery again, he qualifies for LTIR before the season opens. Let's see our options.

> Dzingel is a safe signing. He's 27 and a 20 goal scorer. We need solidity on LW with old getting slower or older. He could command more but I think 4.5 with a bonus might work well.
> Myers is one of the best RD available aside from Stralman, but younger and can play on the second PP unit.
> Shore is the odd man out and makes sense to move for cheap. We could keep him as a PK specialist but at this point it seems pointless with youth coming up.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
55 500 000 $
44 500 000 $
Transactions
ANA
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de STL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de STL
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 000 000 $61 092 757 $0 $2 865 000 $21 907 243 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 3
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
697 500 $697 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

15 mai 2019 à 15 h 10
#1
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
No point in signing Dzingle. Takes a spot from a kid. Should only add a winger if they’re a big upgrade over what they have. Also don’t like the Myers signing. He’s going to get overpaid for a guy that’s played behind Buff and Trouba.
15 mai 2019 à 19 h 54
#2
Jam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Jah1722
No point in signing Dzingle. Takes a spot from a kid. Should only add a winger if they’re a big upgrade over what they have. Also don’t like the Myers signing. He’s going to get overpaid for a guy that’s played behind Buff and Trouba.


I mostly like the option of Dzingel for solidity to things like PP and depth. We are a team that gets injured a LOT and when we start looking at the kids we can get thin pretty quick. BM always signs a couple 1 mil 1 year depth guys for that purpose, but I would like to see a decent kid who could score in the mix. I also like having more bait for the expansion draft.

Myers still offers a lot but plays on a loaded D team. He still plays a great 2 way game and can play both ends well. He's got a good shot on the PP and a big body for PK. We only have 3 real D men next year with Lindholm, Manson, and Fowler. I don't like the idea of 3 kids playing D every night. And I also don't like the discount D men that add very little beyond "veteran presence". Myers or Stalman round off the top 4 nicely.
15 mai 2019 à 22 h 42
#3
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Icarus
I mostly like the option of Dzingel for solidity to things like PP and depth. We are a team that gets injured a LOT and when we start looking at the kids we can get thin pretty quick. BM always signs a couple 1 mil 1 year depth guys for that purpose, but I would like to see a decent kid who could score in the mix. I also like having more bait for the expansion draft.

Myers still offers a lot but plays on a loaded D team. He still plays a great 2 way game and can play both ends well. He's got a good shot on the PP and a big body for PK. We only have 3 real D men next year with Lindholm, Manson, and Fowler. I don't like the idea of 3 kids playing D every night. And I also don't like the discount D men that add very little beyond "veteran presence". Myers or Stalman round off the top 4 nicely.


Personally I’d rather let Fowler play the right and have Guhle round out the top 4 and maybe see what the cost for Honka is. He was drafted in the 1st round so he’s got talent. Maybe a fresh start after he fell outta favor in DAL would be good for him.

As for dzingle you have Ritchie scratched. I know +/- isn’t the greatest stat but he was the only duck regular on the plus side. Rather sign the 1M 1 yr guy as scratch depth and let the kids develop. This team has pretty good potential and with Gibson anything is possible.
16 mai 2019 à 16 h 6
#4
Jam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Jah1722
Personally I’d rather let Fowler play the right and have Guhle round out the top 4 and maybe see what the cost for Honka is. He was drafted in the 1st round so he’s got talent. Maybe a fresh start after he fell outta favor in DAL would be good for him.

As for dzingle you have Ritchie scratched. I know +/- isn’t the greatest stat but he was the only duck regular on the plus side. Rather sign the 1M 1 yr guy as scratch depth and let the kids develop. This team has pretty good potential and with Gibson anything is possible.


I like that idea as well. I think its just hard to say with Guhle. He is a huge ? for the ducks since he barely played after the trade. It would be great to see him or even Larsson make a solid top 4 guy. But I also don't want to rely on trades to fill that need down the line. Honka could be solid as well.

I'll be honest, never been a fan of Ritchie. He seems like he will follow the path of Belesky and Maroon. And I would like to trade him while he has value personally. When he is effective he's a great part of the line up, but he's a bottom six role guy. But I totally agree, I want this young team to get time to play and hopefully under Eakins as coach.
Voir tout