SalarySwishSalarySwish

Applying Suggestions

Créé par: Matthews34
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 14 mai 2019
Publié: 14 mai 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I think this team looks infinitely better than this past season.

Spurgeon plays top pairing with Rielly. Draws heavy matchups and assists the PK.

Brown and Zaitsev off the books. Pay a bit to get rid of Zaitsev. Recoup that asset and an extra by trading Brown.

Kruger/Acciari both signed to cheap deals to help the PK. (Admittedly don't know a lot about those two players, just grabbed them to PK. If they are due for contracts higher than what I gave them, insert any cheap 4th liner than can effectly PK instead)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
79 500 000 $
32 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 100 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
3.
TOR
VAN
  1. Zaitsev, Nikita
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (NYI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 000 000 $77 303 032 $0 $482 500 $5 696 968 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C
UFA
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

14 mai 2019 à 0 h 28
#1
Llinder2016
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,559
Mentions "j'aime": 262
The only way I do the Spurgeon trade is if he comes with an extension. Giving away back to first first would hurt us but if he comes with one then it would be worth. But im not totally apposed to wait for liljigren and Sandin to be in our top four and sign like chairot over the offseason.
Ryminister_27 a aimé ceci.
14 mai 2019 à 0 h 32
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 429
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Quoting: SDSUFRATMAN
The only way I do the Spurgeon trade is if he comes with an extension. Giving away back to first first would hurt us but if he comes with one then it would be worth. But im not totally apposed to wait for liljigren and Sandin to be in our top four and sign like chairot over the offseason.


Fair enough take. Not having a 1st in consecutive years would suck. For me, I just think I'd rather deal the pick than one of Liljegren/Sandin. And I want to get that top pairing defenseman. I'd make the deal extension or not, then if not definitely try to get one done. Our window is wide open now, and I don't want to wait for our D prospects to develop (on average defensemen take a while to develop. Look at Rielly.) I think our prospect cupboard is full enough to do it. Barely, but full enough.
14 mai 2019 à 0 h 34
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
For the big trade with Minnesota, I'd make the pick a conditional 2nd that turns into a 1st if the Leafs win the cup or Spurgeon signs an extension. A young, good roster player plus a guaranteed 1st seems like a very high price for a 1 year rental. Spurgeon is good, but he's not on an elite level.

The main issue here (which a lot of posts on here seem to have) is that no one seems to get that no team in the league is going to go into a season with such little cap space. Especially with no healthy scratches in case of injury. I'd say the minimum any team goes into the season with is $1M in cap space, but that's with a 23 man roster. Anything less and they won't sustain a competitive team over the full season
14 mai 2019 à 0 h 40
#4
Llinder2016
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,559
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: Matthews34
Fair enough take. Not having a 1st in consecutive years would suck. For me, I just think I'd rather deal the pick than one of Liljegren/Sandin. And I want to get that top pairing defenseman. I'd make the deal extension or not, then if not definitely try to get one done. Our window is wide open now, and I don't want to wait for our D prospects to develop (on average defensemen take a while to develop. Look at Rielly.) I think our prospect cupboard is full enough to do it. Barely, but full enough.


Fair enough. I get the window is open and yes I would do it. Maybe have a condition 2nd and if not resigned or not reach points limit then no first
Matthews34 a aimé ceci.
14 mai 2019 à 0 h 41
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 429
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Quoting: Ryminister_27
For the big trade with Minnesota, I'd make the pick a conditional 2nd that turns into a 1st if the Leafs win the cup or Spurgeon signs an extension. A young, good roster player plus a guaranteed 1st seems like a very high price for a 1 year rental. Spurgeon is good, but he's not on an elite level.


Sure, if that is what the deal ends up as I'm obviously not going to argue. Push comes to shove I'll deal the pick if that's what it takes though. Realistically a condition on an extension does make sense.

Quoting: Ryminister_27
The main issue here (which a lot of posts on here seem to have) is that no one seems to get that no team in the league is going to go into a season with such little cap space. Especially with no healthy scratches in case of injury. I'd say the minimum any team goes into the season with is $1M in cap space, but that's with a 23 man roster. Anything less and they won't sustain a competitive team over the full season


Makes sense. With Hyman/Dermott most likely on LTIR to start the season, they will gain a little bit of space over the year to use for call ups. And luckily with the Marlies a taxi away they can keep everyone down there and just emergency recall someone if needed. That was my thought process anyway.
Voir tout