SalarySwishSalarySwish

2nd Best Player Per Team

Créé par: We_Want_The_Cup
Équipe: 2018-19 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 22 avr. 2019
Publié: 22 avr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
DISCLAIMER

1. Based off 18-19 performance only

2. Pts/G was a baseline reference stat, but more factors were considered.

2. There were many difficult calls to make, especially since I wanted no more than 6 defensemen and 3 goalies. Some teams had what I considered a tie, so they were assigned based on roster needs.
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
301 $142 435 000 $0 $9 150 000 $-142 434 999 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 137 500 $4 137 500 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 860 000 $2 860 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
885 833 $885 833 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
650 000 $650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 600 000 $7 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

22 avr. 2019 à 15 h 10
#1
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,283
Personally just as a Canucks fan that has watched a lot of games Horvat was better than Boeser this year.
We_Want_The_Cup a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2019 à 15 h 12
#2
GM Game v1 v2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,147
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: DRshnuckels87
Personally just as a Canucks fan that has watched a lot of games Horvat was better than Boeser this year.

That could be. I rated Horvat and Boeser as relatively even. Boeser had a higher Pts/G, but Horvat had a higher TOI and might have been more of a "complete" player. I didn't watch either enough and valued them evenly, so I went with the baseline stat.
22 avr. 2019 à 15 h 19
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Guentzel was miles better than Malkin this year. Interested on why you put Malkin over him though
22 avr. 2019 à 15 h 29
#4
GM Game v1 v2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,147
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Guentzel was miles better than Malkin this year. Interested on why you put Malkin over him though

To be honest, that was a lazy shortcut pick because I've always seen it as a static order (1. Crosby 2. Malkin 3. Letang 4. Guentzel). One of the few teams that I didn't even bother to look at the stat sheet or give a moment of time to think about usage/context. But looking back now, had I used the same decision-making criteria (70% pts/game, 30% other factors), I'd probably put Malkin & Guentzel at a tie. In pts/g, Malkin's 1.06 > Guentzel's 0.93. However, Jake was more defensively responsible. To note that Jake scored more goals than Malkin, but was on a line with Crosby (he'd still be real good without, but less good).

Kind of a toss up for someone who's not watching Pens games.
hockeyfanatic05 a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2019 à 15 h 53
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: We_Want_The_Cup
To be honest, that was a lazy shortcut pick because I've always seen it as a static order (1. Crosby 2. Malkin 3. Letang 4. Guentzel). One of the few teams that I didn't even bother to look at the stat sheet or give a moment of time to think about usage/context. But looking back now, had I used the same decision-making criteria (70% pts/game, 30% other factors), I'd probably put Malkin & Guentzel at a tie. In pts/g, Malkin's 1.06 > Guentzel's 0.93. However, Jake was more defensively responsible. To note that Jake scored more goals than Malkin, but was on a line with Crosby (he'd still be real good without, but less good).

Kind of a toss up for someone who's not watching Pens games.


Ya I get where you’re coming from. But ask most pens fans, Malkin had a bad year and Guentzel had an incredible year. A lot of pens fans would agree that Guentzel had a better season then Malkin. Geno was invisible for most of the season (to his standards) played zero defense and took wayyyyy too many dumb penalties. Hard to know that stuff though if you don’t watch the games and only look at the stats on paper
We_Want_The_Cup a aimé ceci.
Voir tout