SalarySwishSalarySwish

Stamkos

Créé par: Nyrfn30
Équipe: 2016-17 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 14 mai 2016
Publié: 14 mai 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 750 000 $
2875 000 $
23 500 000 $
1800 000 $
22 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
710 000 000 $
Transactions
NYR
  1. Shattenkirk, Kevin
Détails additionnels:
2018 1st round pick
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2074 000 000 $62 317 500 $0 $0 $11 682 500 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 8
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 3
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
875 000 $875 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 700 000 $4 700 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 592 500 $2 592 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

14 mai 2016 à 13 h 59
#1
LazyBoy GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Is that a conditional 1st in case Shattenkirk doesn't resign? Cause if not, why would the Blues be so desperate to get Stepan that they feel the need to overpay that hard? Shattenkirk is a far more rare and valuable commodity than Stepan.

If Shattenkirk had years left on his deal, it would be the Rangers adding to the deal not the Blues. Might still have to add a low pick honestly. Stephan's just not that prolific a scorer and on STL, his numbers would only go down due to ice time dispersion and playing down the line-up.

It's a nice idea but unless that's a conditional pick, this deal is way off.
14 mai 2016 à 15 h 52
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,776
Mentions "j'aime": 22,809
And most contending teams have long term cap issues. Stepan at 6.5m for what 5 years is not appealing for likely any teams
19 mai 2016 à 13 h 10
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 238
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: palhal
And most contending teams have long term cap issues. Stepan at 6.5m for what 5 years is not appealing for likely any teams
This would only work if Blues lose Backes
19 mai 2016 à 13 h 11
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 238
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: Seanzie8
Is that a conditional 1st in case Shattenkirk doesn't resign? Cause if not, why would the Blues be so desperate to get Stepan that they feel the need to overpay that hard? Shattenkirk is a far more rare and valuable commodity than Stepan.

If Shattenkirk had years left on his deal, it would be the Rangers adding to the deal not the Blues. Might still have to add a low pick honestly. Stephan's just not that prolific a scorer and on STL, his numbers would only go down due to ice time dispersion and playing down the line-up.

It's a nice idea but unless that's a conditional pick, this deal is way off.
Stepan is worth far more than a 1st rd pick.
26 mai 2016 à 13 h 43
#5
LazyBoy GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Nyrfn30
Quoting: Seanzie8
Is that a conditional 1st in case Shattenkirk doesn't resign? Cause if not, why would the Blues be so desperate to get Stepan that they feel the need to overpay that hard? Shattenkirk is a far more rare and valuable commodity than Stepan.

If Shattenkirk had years left on his deal, it would be the Rangers adding to the deal not the Blues. Might still have to add a low pick honestly. Stephan's just not that prolific a scorer and on STL, his numbers would only go down due to ice time dispersion and playing down the line-up.

It's a nice idea but unless that's a conditional pick, this deal is way off.
Stepan is worth far more than a 1st rd pick.


Sure but his contact reduces his value. He's a 60 pt player, something the Blues have a lot of so they're not likely to be super keen to get him. Plus, if Shattenkirk does re-sign with the Rangers in this hypothetical, then they have made out like bandits with a 1st rounder too! They get the more valuable player AND a 1st for a guy the Blues more or less already have. Hence, conditional 1st. Maybe the deal could be restructured to be for Shattenkirk, a prospect and a conditional 1st, that way if the Rangers get burned by Shattenkirk they still have 2 pieces from the deal and cap relief?
Voir tout