ARCHIVES ▾

CBA ▾

CALCS ▾

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾

OUTILS ▾

INTERACTIF ▾

Warpbox

Membre depuis

18 juill. 2022

Équipe favorite

Canucks de Vancouver

Messages dans les forums

3130

Messages par jour

4.7

MENTIONS "J'AIME"

ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG

Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 22 heures

Sujet: Having Fun

No, Hronek is a good player, but the Canes aren’t the team who’s going to over pay him.

Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 18 h 57

Sujet: Buffalo

Yeah not even close

Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 18 h 26

Sujet: Buffalo

Not close for Hronek

Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 18 h 26

Sujet: Buffalo

canucks pass easily

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 21 h 34

Sujet: Vatrano Roy and Reinhardt

No, we won't be retaining on Vatrano, he's already a screaming deal at 3.6 and we have to pay Hronek.

Forum: Armchair-GMdim. à 23 h 32

Sujet: RHD will cost alot--Marner to VAN--JT on LTIR

Canucks won't be interested in Marner at all. He's a great player, but they don't have the cap space to afford his contract. Boeser for Marner doesn't make any sense, yes Marner is an upgrade but not nearly a big enough one to consider paying nearly double the salary for him over Boeser.

Forum: Armchair-GMdim. à 22 h 41

Sujet: RHD will cost alot--Marner to VAN--JT on LTIR

Canucks have no interest in Marner. We are more than happy to keep our top RW that can preform in the playoffs unlike a certain guy coming back in the deal, Soucy has been a huge stabilizer on defense for us no interest in moving him either, would pay a 2nd for Liljgreen but that's about it.

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 18 h 34

Sujet: Moves

Value isn’t bad but I think the Canucks would rather keep Garland. He’s been one of our best players this season

Also giving up a 1st for Pionk would be terrible for Toronto

Forum: Armchair-GM1 mai à 20 h 0

Sujet: Flame On

Canucks aren't moving Willander

Forum: Armchair-GM30 avr. à 21 h 53

Sujet: trade targets

Highly unlikely we move those guys. I think Hill is going to be the odd man out

Forum: Armchair-GM30 avr. à 19 h 50

Sujet: trade targets

Devils likely roll with something like:

Siegenthaler - Hamilton
Hughes - Nemec
Bahl - Marino

Until Casey arrives, we probably don’t move Marino unless we sign someone else and it’s our best ticket for another young dman or goalie. The only wrinkle is that he has 8-team no trade starting July 1st.

Hard to see Marino getting moved this summer.

Forum: Armchair-GM30 avr. à 19 h 24

Sujet: trade targets

I think Marino is the most likely here. Unless they just keep him and play him below Nemec

Forum: Armchair-GM28 avr. à 16 h 29

Sujet: Conservative

Make it a better pick and San Jose would do it I think. Like a 3rd or 4th

Forum: Armchair-GM28 avr. à 10 h 6

Sujet: Blow Up

Easy pass for Canucks.IMHO.

Forum: Armchair-GM28 avr. à 1 h 2

Sujet: Could they be moved

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Warpbox</b></div><div>I feel like that package is slightly over what I'd pay for but overall pretty fair. I'd imagine VAN pushes for either the first or second to be a 2026 pick though so they can keep at least 1 pick in the first two rounds between 2024-2025</div></div>

Piggybacking but yeah TK isnt coming without it being a 1st and one of ur top prospects it’s just the minimum Briere would even think of moving him for or he will just be re-signed

Forum: Armchair-GM27 avr. à 20 h 46

Sujet: Could they be moved

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>radtad</b></div><div>I would hope Briere doesnt give TK away for that package. I think Raty is toe-ing bust realm</div></div>

I think that’s pretty harsh on Raty. He had an elite D+1 year in the Finnish league, struggled last year, but has been really good this year in the AHL. He’s still a pretty good prospect

Forum: Armchair-GM27 avr. à 20 h 14

Sujet: Could they be moved

I’m not familiar with Vancouver’s prospects/young players but Philly is gonna want a 1st and a top prospect or two 1sts. Briere wanted two 1sts and a top prospect last year because he doesn’t wanna move TK even tho they probably should.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 avr. à 20 h 35

Sujet: Could they be moved

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Db1899</b></div><div>Hoglander and 1st for Nelson and a 2nd</div></div>

Can’t see the Canucks moving Hoglander. Cheap, 20+ goals all at 5v5, and good chemistry with Pettersson

Forum: Armchair-GM27 avr. à 20 h 24

Sujet: Could they be moved

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FoxYou727</b></div><div>Doubt Lou moves him, but I feel like we must

I'd want a 50%:

First
roster player for cap
A good prospect</div></div>

Any chance Pulock would shake loose if the team looks to make big changes? With Dobson ahead of him at RHD maybe look to move a long term contract for a 30+ player?

Forum: Armchair-GM27 avr. à 20 h 0

Sujet: Could they be moved

Necas for the right price sure. Hronek would probably be part of whatever package the Nucks and Canes worked with.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 avr. à 15 h 43

Sujet: The pulock ehlers discussion

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Warpbox</b></div><div>How would an Ehlers Hronek swap work? I imagine VAN would look for more assets in the trade but what would Winnipeg think?</div></div>

I'd be okay with it but with how much hronek is reported to have declined from Vancouver it may not be a perfect fit for either team. Jets need basically a better demelo that has size and great defensive attributes. Hronek seems more offensive and softer in comparison to a Pulock. Pulock is also signed long term and from Manitoba. Vancouver would most likely need a rhd back like pionk and then the deal is so complicated with ntc and players that even if you find a trade both teams accept, the players could have a team on a ntc.

Forum: Armchair-GM26 avr. à 14 h 37

Sujet: Are any of these players available v2

Garland is extremely unlikely to be available. Mikheyev probably would be though

Forum: Armchair-GM26 avr. à 9 h 17

Sujet: Hronek

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>qc14</b></div><div>Why would they give up more than VAN did last year???</div></div>

Hronek has grown into a better player since the trade, so the caps should be giving up more. Maybe it's not worth it though if the belief is that Hronek is a product of Hughes, but I think it makes a ton of sense to go after a RHD to play with Sandin long term. Sandin-Carlson doesn't work too great.

Forum: Armchair-GM25 avr. à 22 h 52

Sujet: Hronek

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>qc14</b></div><div>Why would they give up more than VAN did last year???</div></div>

Because he had a career year

Forum: Armchair-GM19 avr. à 13 h 37

Sujet: Tkachuk

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>He's a middle six center, and he's the 2nd line center right now on one of the cup favorites. He's had a down year, but he's still only 23 and normally incredible in all three zones. While his defensive metrics have regressed, his offensive ones have jumped leaps and bounds forwards. He's the better player, and he's worth his contract. Vancouver is adding significantly. End of conversation.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Literally 2C at practice today! Stop it. Vancouver adds significantly. End of conversation</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Cool, he doesn't make 5, he makes 4.8. He's a great middle six C on any team, and he's still only 23! Vancouver adds SIGNIFICANTLY. End of discussion</div></div>

So which one is the End of conversation?

Page 1

Remerciements à Guillaume Lambert-Héon pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français

SalarySwish | Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly

Équipes populaires
Toronto Raptors | Los Angeles Lakers | New York Knicks | Chicago Bulls | Boston Celtics | Cleveland Cavaliers | Golden State Warriors | Miami Heat | Houston Rockets

Joueurs populaires
LeBron James | Stephen Curry | Kawhi Leonard | Pascal Siakam | Kyrie Irving | Giannis Antetokounmpo | James Harden | Kevin Durant | Nikola Jokić | Luka Dončić

Conditions d’utilisationPolitique de confidentialitéRèglements du forumÀ propos de nousFAQ - Convention collectiveNous contacter

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2024 CapFriendly.com