SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

TJTwolf

Membre depuis
18 janv. 2017
Équipe favorite
Avalanche du Colorado
Messages dans les forums
9577
Messages par jour
3.6
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 12 heures
Sujet: Better looking Sens 2024-25 roster
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Chychrun is constantly top of the league in individual scoring chances by defensemen. He is easily one of the best defensemen at getting the puck to net. The only 2 guys consistently better than him every year are Josi and Hamilton (Hamilton missed most of the season so obviously he wasn't there this year) He's also done this while playing on not 1 but 2 bottom of the league teams.

I can understand why it's a bad fit for the Avs due to term and lack of need for a #1 or #2 defenseman but Girard is certainly not better. Chychrun will rightfully get ~8M on his next deal, Girard would not get more than he is making right now</div></div>

Chychrun isn’t a #1 dman at all, he has 2 40pt season in his career he has 17 more career points than Girard logging over 200 more minutes of PP time, his shot metrics 5v5 are middle of the road. You want to pay him $8.5M be my guest have fun with that and a guy that is a 2nd pairing dman.
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 15 h 18
Sujet: Capitals make the move for the future and get younger
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Logicalicesports</b></div><div>Well again the Cap issue is the only way I see something like this happening. Its not his value but the fact that the Avs will need to move someone out. His value is absolutely higher than what I am showing but I am also focusing on the fact that someone will be forced out of Denver and I cannot see them trading Manson, Colton or any of the other big name roster players that are locked up</div></div>

You aren’t thinking this through. You have COL trading a top 4 dman in less than 6 months after they traded another, to acquire a goalie they let walk for a 3rd and $1.5 in cap space. Granted you didn’t do the flip side but then you assume they prefer an older worse performing Kuemper and still have to move Georgiev and then have to fill another top 4 d spot, how is that working cap wise? It isn’t. Maybe COL even moves Girard, highly doubtful but let’s roll with it, they aren’t taking back $3.5M in salary cap if they do. That’s why your cap situation explanation makes no sense COL gets significantly more benefit out of trading someone like Girard for pure futures so they have money to spend on something worth while ie Mittlestadt extension and pocket future assets that are usable in trade. Beside as bad as Georgie has been Kuemper isn’t Girard better than him. Really flawed logic.
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 14 h 9
Forum: Armchair-GMven. à 2 h 36
Sujet: Markstrom
Cory Schneider was 27 when he was traded, and posted a .927, .929, and .937 save percentages the three years before he was traded.
Markstrom is 34 if he is traded this offseason, and has had .892, .905, and .922 save percentages the past three years.
I don't see the comp at all?

Perhaps a better comp would be Marc-Andre Fleury to the Wild
Flower was 36 when he was traded. He had posted .905, .908, and .928 save percentages the three years prior. The return was a conditional second that become a first if Minnesota made the conference finals and Fleury had 4 wins in the first two rounds.

Or Cam Talbot to Ottawa for Filip Gustavvson
Talbot was 34 at the time of the trade and had recorded .911, .915, and .919 save percentages the previous three years. Gustavvson was a recent second round draft pick. I don't know team's prospect pools well enough to give a comparable player, but let's assume it's a second.

The market rate for good, aging goalies seems to be right around a second. Not a top 10 pick or a team's best prospect.