SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Sharkie69

stop daddy it hurts
Membre depuis
19 déc. 2022
Équipe favorite
Sharks de San Jose
Deuxième équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
785
Messages par jour
1.6
Forum: NHL3 févr. à 12 h 39
Sujet: 2023-2024 NHL Discussion Thread #3: After Further Review...
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>Issue is Canes never pay high for rentals

OTT gonna want a 1st at least

Do we see NYR giving up that

As last Canes spent 1st = KK OS and Skeji trade</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CantStopWontStop</b></div><div>I believe the trade cost of Tarasenko could be very low. Effectively free without retention:

He forced a full no trade during the off-season. He’s going to want term to waive.

If any team approaches with an extension, then that’s the only team he would waive for. His agents will have spoken with literally every viable team just this last off season, twice. Two seperate agents.

If a player only waives for one team, their value is the lowest possible. The only way I see tarasenkos trade value increase are if multiple teams are interested in offering him a 3 or 4 year contract. I think, with the cap going up, it is most likely a team will be interested in giving him 3-4 years. Ottawa should truly be happy with whatever they get if a freshly signed player has a full no trade and waives for just one team.

Ottawa -could- find a deal where they retain and get a 1st, but if that team has no interest in keeping Tarasenko then I doubt Tarasenko has interest going there versus a team who wants him for a few years.</div></div>

Last year, Tarasenko allowed his NTC to be waived to just 3 teams.

The Rangers, the Islanders, the Devils.



Let's assume Tarasenko only allows a trade to 3 specific teams this year.

Would Ottawa still be able to get a 1st for Tarasenko ?



Of course, it would depend on what those 3 teams are.
Forum: NHL31 janv. à 1 h 9
Sujet: 2023-2024 NHL Discussion Thread #3: After Further Review...
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LeafsFanForSomeReason</b></div><div>Flames say they had no knowledge of the pending charges against Dube when they released the statement about his leave of absence being mental health related.

That makes them either liars or stupid/incompetent...</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>They likely knew about investigation…but not the charges. And if a player asks for mental health leave, it should be granted.

I think the criticism of Flames on this is unwarranted.

If anything it should be on Dube and his agent.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ricochetii</b></div><div>This.

It's dangerous to question a person's mental health and make assumptions that they are being dubious in their claims.
You have to accept it at face value and allow them to seek treatment.

He isn't necessarily misrepresenting himself.
You can have mental health issues and legal issues at the same time, likely related given the timing.</div></div>

Agree with this, the player is responsible for "requesting the leave" and submitting his reasons; the team is bound by the CBA to either grant it or deny it and face possible legal ramifications as his employer.

If an employee at my company submits a leave request; they don't have to provide details (it's not our business) unless they are asking for specific assistance.

You can't allow for "Mental Health Leave" or any Leave and then say the answers should be publicly stated.

I'm sure the Flames had their suspicions and possibly even some knowledge of the investigation and were more than happy to grant his leave when it was requested; but they can't make up his reasons for him.

For all we know he was ready to harm himself if he wasn't granted the leave away from the team.

All of the vitriol for this infesting the NHL is on Hockey Canada for covering it up years ago and on the perpetrators.