PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Marcsnack
Membre depuis
23 févr. 2020
Messages dans les forums
3355
Messages par jour
2.2
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. à 17 h 55
Sujet:
Is this enough
NSH could just re-sign Zucker at a cheaper cap hit for a similar role/production
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. à 17 h 55
Sujet:
Is this enough
To get Stephenson? Probably not
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 12 h 35
Sujet:
Buyout Candidates
Dvorack also for MTL, but I don't think that will gonna happen...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 12 h 34
Sujet:
Buyout Candidates
Krug.. although Army never buys out. This may be the offseason that changes
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 12 h 28
Sujet:
Buyout Candidates
Maatta can be traded.
Wings will keep Husso next season.
Holl will be bought out.
Petry could be bought out.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 12 h 26
Sujet:
Buyout Candidates
Dubois and Kotkaniemi.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 12 h 25
Sujet:
Buyout Candidates
Korpisalo
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 12 h 24
Sujet:
Buyout Candidates
Goodrow
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 8 h 14
Sujet:
2 players
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>squashmaple</b></div><div>Or Montreal can buy him out and not involve us in that. I fail to see why moving Laine at the nadir of his value is a good business decision at all, let alone one that requires the team to spend significant money. If Laine can’t play, his contract is insured.</div></div>
I think that expecting Laine to get better is a forlorn hope. In this game of "Musical Chairs," I think that the music is about to stop.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 7 h 44
Sujet:
2 players
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>But you'd be buying him out, and instead of $8.7 million x 2 in cap and $18.2 million in real money, you'd be paying out $10 1/3 million in cash and a total of $11 1/3 million in cap spread out over 6 seasons. Saving $7 million + in cap and almost $8 million in compensation and getting a first-round draft pick plus a good prospect out of the deal seems pretty tempting to me. I would think that it's time to close the books on the Laine experience.</div></div>
Or Montreal can buy him out and not involve us in that. I fail to see why moving Laine at the nadir of his value is a good business decision at all, let alone one that requires the team to spend significant money. If Laine can’t play, his contract is insured.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 2 h 44
Sujet:
2 players
I’ve been think about Liane and Montreal, I just have no idea where his value stands
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 0 h 42
Sujet:
2 players
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Viqsi</b></div><div>No interest in taking back Anderson's contract under any circumstances.</div></div>
But you'd be buying him out, and instead of $8.7 million x 2 in cap and $18.2 million in real money, you'd be paying out $10 1/3 million in cash and a total of $11 1/3 million in cap spread out over 6 seasons. Saving $7 million + in cap and almost $8 million in compensation and getting a first-round draft pick plus a good prospect out of the deal seems pretty tempting to me. I would think that it's time to close the books on the Laine experience.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 0 h 23
Sujet:
2 players
No interest in taking back Anderson's contract under any circumstances.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 15 h 16
Sujet:
Moving Krug
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Marcsnack</b></div><div>I feel the same. I do think Graves is a good player in the right system. I really do think his style of play is much better suited to play with Letang/Karlsson than Krug is, but this was just a random idea.</div></div>
If it was up to me, I think I'd do it. The Rakell/Graves contracts are both front loaded which should make it easier to move them when they have just a couple of years term left.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 9 h 23
Sujet:
How we could line up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Marcsnack</b></div><div>Hard to move Jarry without taking a goalie back. Obviously, I would like to run Blomqvist, but wouldnt mind one more year.</div></div>
It might be. Just in my opinion, if that's the case, I'd rather keep Jarry - unless the other parts of the package are really good. You could keep Jarry/Ned for basically the same cap hit as you have here(assuming Ned commands that much/they want to pay him that much) - or play Jarry/Blom for a cheaper cap hit. And I think both of those options are better than Ned/Husso considering the Jarry return and cap hits. Just my perspective on it. Goalies are always a gamble though so who knows
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 0 h 30
Sujet:
How we could line up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Marcsnack</b></div><div>I get that that Monahan contract is not ideal, you make a fair point.
The Murashov thing is also valid. I see them kinda splitting the net in the A if need be, but I guess if we wanna commit to Blom at the NHL level, then we can opt to move Jarry or let Ned walk.</div></div>
I don't think they will split down there.
I think if you look at this year it gives you the road map to next year.
The had Hellberg down there are a mentor to Blom. But Blom got the majority of the starts because they want him to play not sit.
As in playing makes you better.
I think next year is the same issue. Which in some ways makes a 1 year vet goalie coming back make sense. As long as it's cap friendly, but more likely they will find that in FA.
They won't park two young goalies down there to split time. A. it leads to a sort of bad competition and has been something they have avoided repeatedly (usually by trading the young goalie out think Clang), and B. there is no real player reference for help. It's just not best for a young goalies development to only have another young goalie there. Hard to float two and a vet in 72 game seasons.
I think Ned walks this offseason. Pens won't be able to carry that cap hit as he's earned a decent pay day from someone. No harm no foul.
Blom moves up to take his place. Has a mentor in Jarry, and gets the backup starts say 30 or so unless he outplays him than more.
They most likely get a mentor goalie in FA or trade return, from another team as part of cap transfer. They are sent to wbs to help mentor Murashov who I think they would like to play like they did Blom this year, getting 40 some starts.
It's if they both play well, that the issues start. Because soon you are asking why do we need Jarry and can we move him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 1 h 23
Sujet:
What is his value
Not sure they move on, but Dach is probably a comparable for a team who wants him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 0 h 28
Sujet:
What is his value
I highly doubt it. Management likes him and Geekie needs to get acclimated into the NHL. Only reason they would consider it is if they won the lottery and got Celebrini
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. à 23 h 51
Sujet:
How we could line up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Marcsnack</b></div><div>Hard to move Jarry without taking a goalie back. Obviously, I would like to run Blomqvist, but wouldnt mind one more year.</div></div>
The problem with this is they are trying to bring in the russian, and there isn't room down there for both. I'm pretty sure the plan is to move Bloom up if he comes over.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Marcsnack</b></div><div>I could defo see that. Just dont see that many 3C options that are available, barring Monahan, Stephenson & Domi. I dont know if the Pens trust Poulin to run that 3C spot. Yager probably needs a year in the AHL, but hey, I wouldnt be against them being on the team if they are ready.</div></div>
why do you think they need to add a 3C?
You have both Eller and Acciari still on contract, and you didn't trade either here. Don't get me wrong, I don't think either is great at 3C, but either one is capable of playing it in a bridge year if you are unwilling to play Poulin, Yager or Ponomarev there. Either way the last thing they need is a guy signed to a 5 year deal there. It just doesn't match up.
I honestly think if this team could pull it's head out it's backside and give it's youth a real chance next year could be interesting.
You got Yager who might be able to fill a top 6 role, Koivunen who might be able to do the same or middle 6. You got Poulin who could play 3C.
While I'm sure there will be some growing pains, I'd rather have those and let them grow and hope the legs make up for it. They could use the cap to shore up other areas like 3rd pair on short term deals.
I don't think outside of a few of these prospects taking off there is anything they can do to become a legit contender. There simply isn't enough depth there and not enough cap space to totally rebuild the team without moving a lot of bodies out. That isn't really feasible. They will be lucky to move one of either Smith, Eller and Acciari out. I wouldn't expect more than that if any.
What I do know is it's unreasonable to expect the type of super human effort out of Crosby to carry the team on his back at 37 for 82 games. They can't bring in enough from the outside in limited cap space.
If they are going to spend big they should focus on someone like Reinhart. As they will need a real difference maker to put in the top 6. As they have no chance with the 2nd line performing like it did this year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. à 18 h 3
Sujet:
How we could line up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Marcsnack</b></div><div>Husso has been under .900% for both seasons with DET. I feel like Jarry is a clear upgrade, and the assets moved dont hurt DET.</div></div>
Goaltending isn't completely our issue. I don't think Jarry would be much better on this Detroit team. We really need to upgrade our team defense. Also we need to shed salary to help do so and adding 625K won't help. Rather use that cap, and assets if needed, to upgrade the team infront of the goalie.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. à 16 h 36
Sujet:
How we could line up
Monahan has all the look and feel of a trap contract and I really wouldn't want to be tied up in that for 5 years on a guy who's gonna be 30 next season.
Not to mention 5 years is a very problematic situation. You got Yager who will need some time at Center. This team is constantly holding it's youth back. It has to end.
Poulin did a half way decent job at center. Yet this team is constantly pushing him down and not giving him a chance. And for what? So Puustinen who is a RL player to get time?
I mean really these types of decisions need to go.
Play the kid and give him his chance. It's time already.
They don't need to bring in these 30 year old guys blocking the way anymore. By all reports Yager should be able to compete for a spot next year. You got Poulin so that's 2 roles filled.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. à 13 h 28
Sujet:
How we could line up
I'd be fine with a Monahan signing - as well as the Smith trade. Not the biggest fan of the whole goalie scenario though. It seems a bit steep for Ned - and if we're paying him starter money I'd probably try Blomqvist as the backup to spend money elsewhere. And while I'm not opposed to trading Jarry I'm not the biggest fan of the return - mainly in bringing back Husso. Although I understand the thought process with him only having one year left - and that DET would probably want that cap going back. You've got some extra cap space as well that I'd try to utilize.
EDIT: My bad - forgot to read the description about the last dman and realize there was a hole there haha. Yikes. Ignore my cap comment
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. à 12 h 5
Sujet:
How we could line up
Monahan signs for more.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 avr. à 17 h 29
Sujet:
Thoughts
If the pens are taking on a 6 year cap dump I think they want more than a 4th round pick.
KK is overpaid by about 2 mil and still hasn't shown anything beyond being a bottom 6er in nearly 400 nhl games. At this point he is what he is.
Maybe if the canes want to retain 1 or 2 mil I could see the pens taking him on.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 avr. à 18 h 2
Sujet:
Offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabres89</b></div><div>No thanks. Don't need jarry, would rather move Samuelsson or another d, in a package for something nice</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Czu8iks</b></div><div>Surpraisingly Sabres dont need goalie</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Marcsnack</b></div><div>Tried that BUF deal. Jarry's 4 years might be a little too long for BUF.
I could see Acciari moved, but not for a 3rd, and not to Boston.
Rakell and Graves are very unlikely to move this summer.</div></div>
It’s not the most obvious move for the Sabres to make….
But we’ve only seen UPL have 1 good year & this would solidify the goaltending
It also allows Levi time to develop at a slower pace & not rush him
Idk that I’m all for it, but i wouldn’t hate it either
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com