JamieG613

Membre depuis

13 mars 2024

Équipe favorite

Maple Leafs de Toronto

Messages dans les forums

128

Messages par jour

1.9

MESSAGES

SUJETS

MENTIONS "J'AIME"

ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 18 h 39

Sujet: Marner out Stamkos in and a deeper roster

This team is worse than the 2023/24 team

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 17 h 52

Sujet: Game Six Lines

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Hey new flash pal, winning games is more than just “better forward group than the rangers” 😂

I’ll enjoy the Leafs knockout next year, same time!</div></div>

Enjoy blowing a 3-0 lead "pal"

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 17 h 25

Sujet: Game Six Lines

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>I know a Leaf’s fan isn’t talking trash 😂</div></div>

The Leafs forward group is miles ahead of the Rags, sorry we didn't play literally the worst playoff team in the salary cap era in the 1st round

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 11 h 31

Sujet: Game Six Lines

Wow this team is worse than I thought

Forum: Armchair-GMmar. à 17 h 47

Sujet: Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KrakenTheCode</b></div><div>Any Marner trade proposal involving Vince Dunn going the other way is a non-starter. He's their best defenseman and a key part of their roster for both the present and future. Dunn's importance to the team was demonstrated last season when their performance cratered following his injury. The Kraken need scoring, but there are many ways they can boost that without sacrificing one of their team cornerstones.

As for the whole Marner-to-Seattle idea, I think the Kraken will at least do their due diligence and kick the tires on a deal, but the only way I see a trade being made is if it's for another forward with draft capital to balance out the talent discrepancy.</div></div>

What do you think of Wright + Larsson?

Forum: Armchair-GMmar. à 17 h 46

Sujet: Leafs

Yikes that second line is bad. Also, Seattle declines

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 20 h 41

Sujet: Ideal Offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HartemiPanarin</b></div><div>how close lol? like are we talking podkolzin/hoglander close?</div></div>

Bingo

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 20 h 40

Sujet: utah anything but hc

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tjm220</b></div><div>Apparently, it’s Owen Power and you don’t have one of those 😆</div></div>

13 years

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 20 h 13

Sujet: Ideal Offseason

Tanev's getting AT LEAST $6M if it's a 1 year deal

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 20 h 12

Sujet: Kaner Marner

Leafs want a quality return, not quantity

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 19 h 22

Sujet: JT and Marner Waive NTC

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>Poor finishing is a nice excuse for good goaltending BTW (if you look at GSAX) and the goaltenders importance on the powerplay is difficult to minimize.

It’s as if Jeremy Swayman had only a little to do with Toronto’s finishing rate. IMO, Jeremy Swayman was the primary reason Boston beat Toronto. Disagree?

I get because there are less goalies on a roster than forward, your quality in the mid 50th percentile is a better player than a center in the mid 50th

My perspective is Toronto had a better overall roster, but lost because Jeremy Swayman significantly outplayed your tenders.</div></div>

Yeah I agree with this mostly

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 19 h 20

Sujet: Offseason

Leafs decline easily. You're overestimating Markstrom's value

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 19 h 20

Sujet: utah anything but hc

Curious on what price the Leafs would have to pay for Schmaltz

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 15 h 16

Sujet: JT and Marner Waive NTC

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tm0000</b></div><div>Is he really "elite" anymore?</div></div>

Yes. Consistently wins his minutes (xGF%, GF%, corsi etc.), puts up 30 goals and 60+ points, can drive a line, all while taking on the hardest matchups every game

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 15 h 14

Sujet: JT and Marner Waive NTC

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>Yet

LA got bounced easy because of their mediocre goaltending in the playoffs

Toronto lost to an inferior talent team because of goaltending.

Jersey looked liked a team who was ready for a coronation of whose next who was derailed by mediocre goaltending

Ottawa and Detroit got sunk by mediocre goaltending

Sure, there are outliers who buck the likely scenario (like all positions), but most teams that try to go cheap at goalie pay for it. Of all fan bases who should know this. I’d assume it’s Toronto. How many second tier guys do you pursue before you realize it won’t work

No one with cap room is taking Tavares at 11M. Maybe at full retention, he has value. My guess is he tries to leverage an extension to get him to waive and he won’t want to take the salary needed for a team to consider that.</div></div>

LA lost because they got dominated on special teams (0% PP, 55% PK). Same with Toronto + mid 5v5 defense and poor finishing. Ottawa and Detroit both had bad 5v5 play coupled with bad goaltending. Goaltending matters, but it's less important than the T9F & T4D + the 5v5 game

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 10 h 54

Sujet: JT and Marner Waive NTC

Trading for goalies is dumb, especially when you're trading your elite 2C for one

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 10 h 53

Sujet: Seattle Kraken

Leafs say no. Quantity = / = quality

Forum: Armchair-GMdim. à 23 h 38

Sujet: Marner

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Marner doesn't have that kind of value. He's overpaid and ghosts in the playoffs. Without an extension, no WAY Marner nets that kind of return, especially because his NMC basically bends the Leafs over a barrel</div></div>

So you're admitting that your proposal was terrible?

Forum: Armchair-GM12 mai à 22 h 16

Sujet: marner

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMBL</b></div><div>Why do you think it's an awful trade? Not saying it isn't but say if it was Wright + Larsson + 2025 1st for Marner + a 3rd, what would you hate about it?

I eliminated Borgen, since I don't think SEA will just want to trade away their top RD and someone they are familiar just to end up with a new guy in Liljegren who is similar. I took off Liljegren and Robertson because the Leafs shouldn't be dealing Marner with 3 assets.</div></div>

Yeah, Wright + Larsson + A 1st for Marner + A 3rd is something I'm okay with (even without the picks involved). My issue is adding on Lily and Robbo who are our two best young NHL-caliber trade assets for no good reason, especially when they're cheap

Forum: Armchair-GM12 mai à 22 h 14

Sujet: Marner

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>It drastically improves your back end, and it opens up a ton of cap space to find a netminder. Plus, Burns shows up in the postseason. Declining it is fine, but this is as helpful an offer for Marner as the Leafs will get.</div></div>

Leafs are going to want impact players with term on their contract + cap space. Burns has no term and Kuzy is basically a salary dump. It's not a logical trade and there will 100% be a better offer than this

Forum: Armchair-GM12 mai à 17 h 47

Sujet: Marner

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>For 1 year of Marner, and Leafs get a solution at RD they haven't had in years, and, what 5 mill in cap relief?</div></div>

I'd rather have Marner. No reason for us to make that trade

Forum: Armchair-GM12 mai à 17 h 46

Sujet: Retooling After Feedback

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AdamL188</b></div><div>My comparables were:
Kuemper for a 1st, 3rd and Timmins (lol)
Frederik Anderson for a 1st, 2nd
Markstrom is better than those 2 were when they were traded, so it seems fair to me.
Maybe take out Minten and add like a Robertson/Lily or something
Gotta remember you're also paying for retention</div></div>

Markstrom isn't nearly as valuable an asset as Robertson/Lily/Minten/A 1st are. He has 1 year left and isn't a needle mover

Forum: Armchair-GM12 mai à 17 h 42

Sujet: marner

Leafs say no, that'd be an awful trade

Forum: Armchair-GM11 mai à 19 h 8

Sujet: No Trading the core plenty of cap space for UFAs

Roy & DeMelo both go for double that price. No reason to pay a backup goalie more than 2M either

Forum: Armchair-GM11 mai à 19 h 6

Sujet: Need a star Mitchell

Marner for Larsson + Wright is probably more fair. Leafs say no to that trade as is

Premier23 Suivant

Page 2

PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE

COTES DES PARIS

LANGUE

ARCHIVES

CBA

CALCS

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY

OUTILS

JOUEURS

CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST

CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST

OUTILS INTERACTIFS

JamieG613

Membre depuis

Équipe favorite

Messages dans les forums

Messages par jour