11 mai 2023
Messages dans les forums
Messages par jour
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gmgb</b></div><div>Zadorov is three years older than Fabbro, a rental, makes $1.25M more, and CGY didn't retain any salary, like you're asking NSH to do. I don't think they're especially comparable.
I'd ballpark Fabbro's value at a 2nd and a 4th, without any retention. I don't see NSH being eager to give up their final retention spot on such an insignificant amount here. Especially if they're trying to trade Barrie, who'd likely require NSH to retain.
Before Novak's injury, I would have said a late 1st for him. Because he got hurt, there may need to be conditions on that pick, tied to Novak's health/performance. He's a legit top six center at a cap hit so low, even a team like TOR could fit him in. A 3rd and Nolan Patrick 2.0 isn't going to get it done.</div></div>
Now it honestly feels like you’re just nitpicking a bit too much..
If that’s your value on Fabbro, then the value here is fine. Moldenhauer is a very good prospect. Creates a lot offensively. Then I’ve included a 3rd which is higher than the 4th you’ve suggested so that adds value, and the 5th is for the retention since it’s only 25% of his salary for maybe 15 games of Fabbro.
Novak is a tough one because of the injury and he wouldn’t play centre in Toronto. But Robertson has performed well this year and every year he’s played in the AHL, he’s worth taking a shot on and has a bit of the gritty style to him. Conditions would be tricky without Toronto having many early picks, and I don’t think any conditions would be included that could make it a 1st round pick cause that’s just too high. A little ironic how you use Robertson’s injury history against him but barely mention Novak’s.
The value doesn’t seem that far off based on what you’ve said tbh.