SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Emil_Ismo

Membre depuis
30 août 2023
Équipe favorite
Sharks de San Jose
Deuxième équipe favorite
Sabres de Buffalo
Messages dans les forums
84
Messages par jour
0.3
Forum: Armchair-GM28 févr. à 14 h 42
Sujet: Best case realistic deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharksdoee</b></div><div>I think MG will want a 2nd to take on RJ, or at least add a 4/5 to the 3rd.
Duke is kind of the same scenario above in terms of value, especially with retention.
I think that's a decent enough Campbell trade. Petrov doesn't add much so if it's a 1st + 3rd to dump I think MG would want XB or Broberg back as well. Also, would EDM be more interested in AB than LK? If they split up Drai and McD I would love to see AB playmaking Drai.
Overall I'd probably take these as they generally help the future.</div></div>

I don't think Colorado will want to dump Ryjo for a 2nd if they're not getting anything in return. It's not like he's a bum, he's just not worth 4 million.

I could see Duclair going for a second as well if there's a bidding war for him come to deadline. But in a vacuum I don't see a team paying more than a third. I also wanted to keep it as grounded and "pessimistic" as possible.
Forum: Armchair-GM17 déc. 2023 à 12 h 0
Sujet: Leonard to sharks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RecycleShark</b></div><div>I see your point, but I think this would still be worth it for the Sharks. Leonard looks like a sure bet to be top 6 forward. He has the toughness the Sharks need. He has chemistry with Smith, and was a steal at #7 overall. I read that the Sharks were even considering taking him over Smith with the #4 pick. Leonard is a safer bet to have an impact than any future pick higher than #10 overall. This seems like an overpay for him, but even at this price some Caps fans decline.</div></div>

I strongly disagree.

Like I said, Leonard looks good, but there's no reason to suspect someone of similar potential will not be available in the top-5 this year. Not to mention the fact the Sharks will have good lottery odds so it's possible that the pick is at #1 or #2. Plus we're giving up another first in the 10-12 range AND a high second? Lets say the Sharks pick at #4 and the Penguins end up at #12.

You're willing to trade Helenius/Levshunov, Zayne Parekh, and someone like Liam Greentree for Leonard straight up? And remember, that first pick could be at #1.
Forum: Armchair-GM28 nov. 2023 à 17 h 18
Sujet: Perry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeterChiarelli</b></div><div>I'm not looking at this as separate trades though: Edmonton has their own Ferraro in Kulak, his inclusion in the deal, and Janmark's, aren't relevant. I asked you how the combination of the two prospects, next year's first, and Campbell fails to fetch Blackwood. You've ignored that question.

The underlying expectation of any team acquiring Campbell is that he's going to be bought out in the offseason, because (as you've correctly identified), he's not playing at an NHL level. I'd argue he's even sub-AHL at the moment. His buyout costs $10.5M. Blackwood is owed another year at $2.5M in real cash dollars. If you want to get nitty-gritty about the money involved, Jackie is roughly owed another $2.85M in the AHL this season, and Blackwood is owed about $1.74M. The Sharks aren't looking at acquiring a $15M tab if they acquire Campbell: that figure is only about $9.1M spread over six years.

Even if the idea of "a first and a third" is less than your expectation, either Bourgault or Broberg hold more inherent value than said pick. The Leafs got absolutely hosed when they had to turf Marleau's $6.5M for what was expected to be a late first-round pick: extrapolating on that math suggests that a first and a B+ prospect is good value for eating Campbell's buyout (it's less than 1.5x the Marleau buyout and is way less impactful to the Sharks than that buyout was to the Hurricanes). Is Blackwood worth a prospect equivalent to Broberg or Bourgault? Probably not, but the Oilers aren't in a position to bargain. I suspect any excess value in that math makes up for whatever you feel is lacking in the first and prospect tag in acquiring Campbell.

EDIT: that math on what the Sharks would owe Campbell takes into consideration how much of Blackwood they aren't on the hook for AND the discrepancy in their remaining cap hits for this year: it's a net +$9.1M, not $9.1M owed.</div></div>

Real cash is not a concern for the Sharks, that's not where the cost of Campbell stems from and we both know it. As said by the other commentator, the market cost of Campbell seems to be three good assets. Broberg fills that criteria, the 2025 first fills that critera, but I don't think Bourgault does as I said earlier. So that's two a-grade assets and one b-grade, without taking into account the fact that the Sharks are shipping Blackwood back. We're not talking about a massive discrepancy in value in here, but there definitely is one
Forum: Armchair-GM28 nov. 2023 à 16 h 19
Sujet: Perry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeterChiarelli</b></div><div>If the rumoured ask to dump Campbell is a first and a third, how is the sum total of said first and two of Edmonton's best prospects not getting this done? Ultimately, are your feelings about taking back the contract aligned with the reality of the situation?

I personally don't have an interest in acquiring Ferraro, and the inclusion of Janmark is a nothingburger, but the package of Bourgault, Broberg, Campbell, and the requisite first absolutely fetches Blackwood (at least on paper). I recognize that the Sharks only have LHD and might not hold Broberg in high regard, but I think your stance on this specific trade is, well, skewed.</div></div>

I don't think you've been reading rumours, you've been reading the wish list of Oilers beat writers. There is absolutely no way any team takes on Campbell for a 1st (in 2025 I might add which decreases its value) and a 3rd considering how incredibly cap strapped almost every team in the league is right now. Campbell is an AHL player making $5 million a year for three (!) more years <em>after</em> this season!

As I said, the first is in 2025 instead of 2024 which lowers its value. Bourgault has had a rough season so far, and his value is definitely lower than last year. Broberg is still valuable, even if not for the Sharks, and Janmark is just a wash

Let's treat it like two separate trades. I wouldn't accept Bourgault &amp; Janmark for Blackwood &amp; Ferraro, and I wouldn't accept to take on Campbell for Broberg and a 2025 first (even if it's not far away).
Forum: Armchair-GM24 nov. 2023 à 12 h 38
Sujet: Early trade deadline and pre-draft predictions
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div>I think the allure is to only move Campbell this season to make a run of it. If they are willing to wait till next year and throw in the towel already, simply buy him out next year and keep the picks t use on a high end goalie. They'll have plenty of cap space with Campbell BO and cap rising to make that pitch next year.

Also EDM cannot just throw this season away. Maybe they don't make a huge deal fine, but they got to do something. They got to sell to Drai and McD still and throwing a season of their primes away is not going to help that at all. If Draisaitl goes, McDavid probably goes the following year. They have to do a little something this year and then a lot going forward. Sitting idle is not an option.</div></div>

Alright, lets say the Campbell deal was on the table now. Would you take it?