SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Bcarlo25

Bcarlo25
Membre depuis
8 mai 2018
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Messages dans les forums
21231
Messages par jour
9.7
Forum: Trade Machine Proposalsjeu. à 17 h 28
Sujet: If Washington leans more rebuild than re-tool
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Augustus</b></div><div>You seem incapable of explaining how two players with little to nothing to show for in the NHL to this point are so much better than a 27 goal 67 point center who put up those numbers on a very average team. You just saying "it isn't worth my time" is meaningless to me, especially since you did in fact take the time to respond to it.</div></div>

dylan strome is a nice player.

do you know how rare it is that a teenager can play center in the NHL, for a good team no less? right there, it's a hard pass. no shot the bruins would trade poitras for strome...who again, is a nice player. but he's not special. then add in the teams top prospect, the reigning vezina winner, and a first. you kidding me?
Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 15 h 16
Sujet: Full Michkov
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>Huh, because he actually really good up until February when he ran out of gas. It typically happens to rookies because they aren’t used to playing all those games coming from college. Has to be even harder coming off of not playing any games in 2 years.

Beecher must suck then cause his numbers were way worse than a guy whose “play is horrible”. Geekie must suck cause he had the same amount of points and I bet is worse defensively. If Coots is horrible then half your team is horrible lol. And that half of players had worse numbers than Coots who is coming off of 2 back surgeries, what’s ur players excuse?</div></div>

think those injury concerns have gone away? they haven't. Geekie was awesome - and makes close to a quarter of what "coots," (cute), makes. Beecher was solid in his call up, and is on an ELC. Everything in the NHL cap word is a function of the players on-ice contribution weighed against their contract. Geekie and Beecher far outvalue their contract. Much the opposite for ole coots. he's stuck in philly. enjoy.
Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 14 h 56
Sujet: Making Stamkos a Lightning for life
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>corson</b></div><div>Because Stamkos is 34 before the 2024-25 season starts the 35+ CBA rule would not apply to him

What is a 35-plus contract?
A contract is designated a 35+ contract if the players age on the first year of the contract is 35 or older (as of June 30 prior to the year of the effective contract).

35+ contracts that are two years in length or longer and:
1. Have a signing bonus in the 2nd or later year, OR
2. Are front-loaded
Will not benefit from a reduced cap hit regardless of the players location of play, termination, retired status, or a buyout. This rule was introduced by the NHL to prevent teams from backloading contracts past when the player was expected to retire. An exception to this rule is that a team will receive a $100,000 cap hit reduction if the player is on the 2nd or later year of the contract and assigned to the minors

I copied and pasted this from this website so I assume this info is correct
So if this is correct then because Stamkos turns 35 in February, TB can sign him to the contract mentioned above and not be liable for the cap hit if he retires after 4 years.</div></div>

ya no.

they got rid of the frontloaded contracts for every contract in the NHL. there can be fluctuation from year to year, but nowhere close to what you're describing. and if that wasn't the case, if stamkos retired after four years the lightning would be hit with a ridiculous recapture penalty.

So no, everything about that deal is illegal and cannot be done. there can't be a difference of more than 25% in adjacent years, and there cannot be more than a 50% difference in any years.
Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 14 h 32
Sujet: Making Stamkos a Lightning for life
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>corson</b></div><div>I was watching a Habs podcast called The Sick Podcast with Tony Marinaro, and they interviewed the Lightning commentators (I forget what their names were).
Tony was asking about how TB could afford Stamkos and if they thought Stamkos would sign with Montreal to be with Martin St.Louis.
They said there is almost zero percent that Stamkos will leave TB.
What they suggest that will happen is that TB will sign Stamkos to an 8 year contract that is heavily front loaded.
So it essentially will look like this:
4 years at $10 million followed by 4 years at $1 million for a total of $44 million over 8 years, which would give a cap hit of $5.5 million per season.
So after Stamkos plays the first 4 years he would then be 39 years old and have collected $40 million of his $44 million.
Stamkos would then only have $4 million left owed to him over the next 4 years.
He would then retire and TB would be off the hook for the remaining 4 years of cap hit at $5.5 million.
Stamkos could then take some sort of office job and get paid the remaining $4 million but it won't count against TBs cap.

Sounds pretty sketchy but seems like something TB would do.</div></div>

stop listening to that pod - the CBA doesn't allow this.