SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pittsburgh trade based on Darren Dreger rumour

Créé par: Texus
Équipe: 2017-18 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 20 oct. 2017
Publié: 20 oct. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This one might actually make sense for both teams. It works on the cap for both.

Not sure about including Sprong but I don't see a spot for him in Pitt's lineup any time soon anyways. And I feel Mtl needs to get a forward back in a Galchenyuk deal even if it's not the main piece. Sprong's junior and AHL numbers are also pretty impressive...

Certainly doesn't solve all of Mtl's problems up front but the improvement on the back end could be pretty huge and help the transition game and in turn team offense.
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
2019
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2020
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2375 000 000 $61 638 700 $0 $1 002 500 $13 361 300 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 6
692 500 $692 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
839 166 $839 166 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
1 166 667 $1 166 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
912 500 $912 500 $
C
UFA - 1
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 5
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 9
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
1 062 500 $1 062 500 $
G
UFA - 2
748 333 $748 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG/DD
UFA - 3
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
1 425 000 $1 425 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
863 333 $863 333 $
DD
UFA - 3
720 000 $720 000 $
AG
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 oct. 2017 à 1 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,922
Mentions "j'aime": 6,981
PLEASEEEEEEE
20 oct. 2017 à 2 h 11
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 136
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: mhockey91
PLEASEEEEEEE


Yeah grin I'm doing a little more reading on Sprong though, I think it's probably way too greedy to include him in this trade unless Mtl adds more lol... But we can dream right?

I do think Galchenyuk for Maatta makes a lot of sense though.
20 oct. 2017 à 2 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Maatta is currently playing great hockey so I don't think PIT is interested in trading him right now, and in the event of injury, Sprong is probably the first forward called up. I like Galchenyuk but I don't think he can really be a quality center, I see him more of a top 6 winger
20 oct. 2017 à 2 h 28
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,922
Mentions "j'aime": 6,981
I think a trade around maatta and galchenyuk is perfect for both teams. pit LOVES reclamation projects
Texus a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2017 à 2 h 32
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 136
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Klink2014
Maatta is currently playing great hockey so I don't think PIT is interested in trading him right now, and in the event of injury, Sprong is probably the first forward called up. I like Galchenyuk but I don't think he can really be a quality center, I see him more of a top 6 winger


I totally agree about Galchenyuk being a winger, but Darren Dreger specifically mentioned his name in connection with Pitt's search for a C so that's pretty much the only reason I did this roster. I was really surprised that was the info Dreger got but it is what it is.

And for Maatta I've seen a lot of Pens fans on here saying he's playing great, but is he really indispensable though? He's still their fifth ranked defenseman in total ice time so far this season, and more importantly 5th by a pretty big margin at 5 on 5... Seems to me like he can be sacrificed to add another potentially very dynamic offensive forward like Galchenyuk.
Klink2014 a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2017 à 2 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: mhockey91
I think a trade around maatta and galchenyuk is perfect for both teams. pit LOVES reclamation projects


You're right and the Schultz trade worked out great for them, but they gave up a 3rd because it was a reclamation project. Galchenyuk was skating on the 4th line wing if I'm not mistaken, so his value is very low. Maatta is PITs second best defensemen right now, so his value is high
20 oct. 2017 à 2 h 35
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 136
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: mhockey91
I think a trade around maatta and galchenyuk is perfect for both teams. pit LOVES reclamation projects


So true, it's starting to seem very likely the more I think about it. The way Mtl is going defensively too, it might happen sooner than later.
20 oct. 2017 à 2 h 37
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 136
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Klink2014


You're right and the Schultz trade worked out great for them, but they gave up a 3rd because it was a reclamation project. Galchenyuk was skating on the 4th line wing if I'm not mistaken, so his value is very low. Maatta is PITs second best defensemen right now, so his value is high


That's true but both players have fairly long track records in the NHL already, I don't think their value can be tied only to how they are playing specifically right now...
20 oct. 2017 à 2 h 40
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Texus
Quoting: Klink2014
Maatta is currently playing great hockey so I don't think PIT is interested in trading him right now, and in the event of injury, Sprong is probably the first forward called up. I like Galchenyuk but I don't think he can really be a quality center, I see him more of a top 6 winger


I totally agree about Galchenyuk being a winger, but Darren Dreger specifically mentioned his name in connection with Pitt's search for a C so that's pretty much the only reason I did this roster. I was really surprised that was the info Dreger got but it is what it is.

And for Maatta I've seen a lot of Pens fans on here saying he's playing great, but is he really indispensable though? He's still their fifth ranked defenseman in total ice time so far this season, and more importantly 5th by a pretty big margin at 5 on 5... Seems to me like he can be sacrificed to add another potentially very dynamic offensive forward like Galchenyuk.


Yeah i saw the article so i know exactly what you mean Dreger definitely mentioned PIT, and they've probably looked into it, just like they did previously with Sheahan and Duchene. I just don't know if I want to trade Maatta who's playing well for a center who probably is better suited for the wing and isn't playing so well. If both were playing well then I'd say Maatta for Galchenyuk straight up would be a fair hockey trade, just like Johansen and Jones
Texus a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2017 à 10 h 20
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Why? Would Montreal be interested in Maatta the guys has missed well over 100 games in the last 4 seasons and has health issues. No way i'd be surrendering Galchenyuk for Maatta that would be a very bad deal for MB.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage