SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason with updated UFAs

Créé par: zhengbangstu
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 30 juin 2024
Publié: 30 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Barrett Hayton hasn't been given a qualifying offer, thus why I had to create him, CapFriendly hasn't updated that just yet. Oddly enough Brannstrom and Lunqvist have been updated. I know the idea of signing both looks a little odd but hear me out.

Now that you have 8 dmen to run with you can get creative with that bottom pair, if you need size run wotherspoon-peeke, need more offense brannstrom-lundqvist. I think brannstrom would be a perfect fit for the Bruins as a transition D and I've always been high on lundqvist.

Now for hayton. I noticed he wasn't given a QO so I thought he'd be an interesting project. You could flip him and zacha in the lines to see what the better fit would be. I've come around to the idea of coyle in the wing only if poitras is up the middle as you could also split time between those two at the C2 spot so poitras can get reps at center and give him some added positional experience on the RW2.
I think as I have it, the 3rd line would be super annoying and be sneaky in the points. That bottom 6 is pretty interchangeable for me besides the LW3 and RW3 spots. Zacha,Hayton - C3 - Frederic would have to be the third line for me, I believe theres too much talent there to have any one of those guys on the 4th line.
My concern is the contracts I've given, I'd like some feedback on how close the money is to what's probably likely.

Lastly I have Bussi in the AHL, this is under the assumption he loses out to Korpi in camp.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
67 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
23 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Hayton, Barrett
33 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2027
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2388 000 000 $87 038 334 $50 000 $330 000 $961 666 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Hayton, Barrett
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
Hier à 5 h 15
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 810
Mentions "j'aime": 158
Looks and sounds good but I have a few questions. Did Hayton have an injury last year? He only played 33 games and was a minus 13. I like that he’s a big body from Kitchener but just curious since he played the full season before and got 43 points. Also, Boqvist wasn’t given a QO so do you think they still offer him something after he tests free agency? Lastly, you have Brazeau on the LW4 spot. With this lineup I would have Zacha/Lindholm/Pasta - L2 as is - Frederic/Hayton/Geekie - Beecher/Kastelic/Brazeau. I agree with your defensive run down!!
zhengbangstu a aimé ceci.
Hier à 9 h 16
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 191
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: Bruinadian67
Looks and sounds good but I have a few questions. Did Hayton have an injury last year? He only played 33 games and was a minus 13. I like that he’s a big body from Kitchener but just curious since he played the full season before and got 43 points. Also, Boqvist wasn’t given a QO so do you think they still offer him something after he tests free agency? Lastly, you have Brazeau on the LW4 spot. With this lineup I would have Zacha/Lindholm/Pasta - L2 as is - Frederic/Hayton/Geekie - Beecher/Kastelic/Brazeau. I agree with your defensive run down!!


Hayton had a couple injuries last season, I believe he started the year super slow, got an injury, came back and player a bit and got injured again.
I would still give boqvist a deal, not sure why he wasnt qualified, very solid bottom 6 forward for us.
I have Brazzeau on LW4 because I'm pretty sure he was on the LW for a lot of his playing time last season, I could be mistaken but I believe the wings are fairly interchangeable if its not your superstar.
Lastly when I checked haytons numbers while making this I saw that his FO% was under 50% and knowing how bad the bruins were in the dot last season I could justify having him a center so thats why I have beecher at C3 (also because I really think beecher and kastelic have to find a way to both get more reps at C), beecher would get more ice team, be good in the dot, be really good defensively and maybe get a boost in points.
I do like that Freddy-Hayton-Geekie line, that will get some points and be big and annoying.
Bruinadian67 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage