SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Revamping defence

Créé par: HShockey
Équipe: 2024-25 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 6 mai 2024
Publié: 6 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 415 739 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 250 000 $
32 750 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
65 350 000 $
53 000 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Välimäki, Juuso1 415 739 $Aucune compensation
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Liljegren, Timothy [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
PHI
  1. Robertson, Nicholas [Droits de RFA]
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (NYI)
4.
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (STL)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (STL)
5.
TOR
  1. Chychrun, Jakob (2 300 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Unlikely they trade him to us but who knows
OTT
  1. Kämpf, David
  2. Niemelä, Topi
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
They flip assets for a big time forward/upgrade on D
6.
TOR
  1. Sturm, Nico (1 000 000 $ retained)
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $87 365 073 $0 $0 $334 927 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
904 667 $904 667 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA
1 415 739 $1 415 739 $
DG
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 mai à 12 h 9
#1
Islanders
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 4
isles decline
Nightowl26 a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 12 h 22
#2
porkychopy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 208
Mentions "j'aime": 33
dont quite see why the flyers would say no to that, maybe the later 2nd?
6 mai à 12 h 23
#3
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,067
Mentions "j'aime": 909
These are awful for every team that isn't the leafs. Sturms not going anywhere for anything less than a 2nd and adding retention is a joke.

I like Liljegren but giving up Zetterlund for him is a complete joke.
RecycleShark a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 12 h 25
#4
Nightowl26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 1,626
Mentions "j'aime": 483
Isles laugh...
6 mai à 14 h 2
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,724
Quoting: AStovetop
These are awful for every team that isn't the leafs. Sturms not going anywhere for anything less than a 2nd and adding retention is a joke.

I like Liljegren but giving up Zetterlund for him is a complete joke.


I feel the same about Liljegren, like him… but not for Zetterlund.

And Sturm for a 3rd is more reasonable honestly but sharks can’t retain.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 14 h 40
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,194
Mentions "j'aime": 1,621
OTT declines
6 mai à 15 h 0
#7
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,067
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I feel the same about Liljegren, like him… but not for Zetterlund.

And Sturm for a 3rd is more reasonable honestly but sharks can’t retain.


He's a workhorse depth C and a great leader on this team as they rebuild. A 3rd isn't worth it with how thin they are down the middle.
They need guys like him and Kunin around to be leaders
6 mai à 15 h 10
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,724
Quoting: AStovetop
He's a workhorse depth C and a great leader on this team as they rebuild. A 3rd isn't worth it with how thin they are down the middle.
They need guys like him and Kunin around to be leaders


Ok…. But that doesn’t change his value. If we traded him a 3rd is likely the best bet.
6 mai à 16 h 11
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,280
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: AStovetop
He's a workhorse depth C and a great leader on this team as they rebuild. A 3rd isn't worth it with how thin they are down the middle.
They need guys like him and Kunin around to be leaders


Their lack of any offensive talent really negates their grit and leadership. Kunin is such a plug lol

At least sturm has good faceoff stats, is speedy and can effectively center a bottom-6 line. That sadly doesn't make him (or Kunin) worth a 2nd though.
6 mai à 16 h 32
#10
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,067
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
Their lack of any offensive talent really negates their grit and leadership. Kunin is such a plug lol

At least sturm has good faceoff stats, is speedy and can effectively center a bottom-6 line. That sadly doesn't make him (or Kunin) worth a 2nd though.


I didn't say Kunin was worth a 2nd. And you must not have watched Kunin the last month. He was probably the best Shark without Lund in their name. 3rds are not great assets, so giving up a leaders on a team that's already seen an unbelievable amount of turnover over the past few years is very damaging to a team.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage