SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hopeful plans for the future part 1

Créé par: Rob32sjsharks
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 30 avr. 2024
Publié: 5 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
My dream draft scenario. Sharks end up with 1st and 14th pick, with a run on D between 2-13 Eiserman falls to 14 and while sharks need D they go for a Sniper to pair with their playmakers.
24 Draft
1st OA Macklin Celebrini LHC
14th OA Cole Eiserman LW
33rd OA Dominik Badinka RD
42nd OA Jesse Pulkkinen LD
85th OA Carter George G

This would be my ideal Draft with a #1 C, a potential 30G sniper wing, a Big LD and RD both with solid D and some offensive upside, and a G with some promise. In 3-5 years this could be shaping up as a decent but underwhelming draft where Celebrini is the only legit NHL player, or a dynamite draft with 4-5 NHL players and a couple being impact players.

For now I am not signing Celebrini or Eiserman and letting them go back to college 1 more year,
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3897 000 $
3897 000 $
2775 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 150 000 $
21 150 000 $
21 150 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
22 550 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
14 000 000 $
14 000 000 $
77 850 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de TBL
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 675 000 $69 560 000 $0 $1 807 500 $18 115 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
941 667 $941 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (100 000 $$100K100 000 $$100K)
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 mai à 23 h 10
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,791
Mentions "j'aime": 1,014
no way those contracts get signed, sorry frown
FunMustBeAlways et SupremeBone a aimé ceci.
5 mai à 23 h 12
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,777
Mentions "j'aime": 4,945
Quoting: Letsgosharks
no way those contracts get signed, sorry frown


Which ones?
6 mai à 0 h 9
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,719
Debrusk should be looking for term (which he'll likely get at around 4 to 4.5mil) and I can't imagine Montour choosing to go to a team in the basement. Roslovic is more of a possibility as he'll likely be seeking to sign somewhere with opportunities to play in the top-6 and I don't see many teams offering him 4mil.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 0 h 47
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,777
Mentions "j'aime": 4,945
Quoting: SupremeBone
Debrusk should be looking for term (which he'll likely get at around 4 to 4.5mil) and I can't imagine Montour choosing to go to a team in the basement. Roslovic is more of a possibility as he'll likely be seeking to sign somewhere with opportunities to play in the top-6 and I don't see many teams offering him 4mil.


My idea here is Montour gets offers for 3-5 years only by contenders and with Celebrini a huge amount of cap
Space and securing the long term deal he wants plus joining a team with a top 5 prospect pool that he could sign just like Hamilton did with NJD and he gets to be a part of their rise to contention.

Debrusk miscalculates the FA market and winds up with lack of good options and opts for a top 6 staple roll to try and increase his value.

I’m not saying this is a slam dunk option, I’m saying I’m hopeful sharks can make these kind of deals
6 mai à 1 h 5
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,719
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
My idea here is Montour gets offers for 3-5 years only by contenders and with Celebrini a huge amount of cap
Space and securing the long term deal he wants plus joining a team with a top 5 prospect pool that he could sign just like Hamilton did with NJD and he gets to be a part of their rise to contention.

Debrusk miscalculates the FA market and winds up with lack of good options and opts for a top 6 staple roll to try and increase his value.

I’m not saying this is a slam dunk option, I’m saying I’m hopeful sharks can make these kind of deals

Hmm, well I won't say it's impossible. However, at least with Debrusk I can be pretty confident that a team like EDM could find room for him in their top-6 if his goal was to increase his value while also still likely getting his 3 to 4mil.
6 mai à 1 h 33
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,777
Mentions "j'aime": 4,945
Quoting: SupremeBone
Hmm, well I won't say it's impossible. However, at least with Debrusk I can be pretty confident that a team like EDM could find room for him in their top-6 if his goal was to increase his value while also still likely getting his 3 to 4mil.


Fair! And it doesn’t have to be Debrusk, or even a signing it could be a trade, the cap hit and 1 year deal is what I’m after and need for the potential TDL move for draft capitol
6 mai à 2 h 7
#7
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,580
Mentions "j'aime": 466
Montour would be great, but probably out of reach.
I wouldn't put Bords and Gush on the same line.
Like the Roslovic signing.

If Yakemchuk or Jiricek were available at 14 would you take one of them over Eiserman?

Nice drafting a Center, Winger, LD, RD, goalie
6 mai à 2 h 19
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,777
Mentions "j'aime": 4,945
Quoting: RecycleShark
Montour would be great, but probably out of reach.
I wouldn't put Bords and Gush on the same line.
Like the Roslovic signing.

If Yakemchuk or Jiricek were available at 14 would you take one of them over Eiserman?

Nice drafting a Center, Winger, LD, RD, goalie


Think Eiserman is too tempting and we have time to get that big offensive RD
Thanks! Btw
And Montour it the biggest “hopeful” on this post.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage