SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Staal for Soderberg

Créé par: HeaveHo
Équipe: 2017-18 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 25 juill. 2017
Publié: 25 juill. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Is this enough of a sweetener, along with the actual dollar savings ($14M - $10.6M = $3.4M), to get the Avs to take on Staal’s contract? I don’t know, but it seems to fill a position of need for both teams.

Would Staal waive his NTC to go to Colorado? Of course not. I don’t know why I’m even throwing this trade out there.
Transactions
NYR
  1. Söderberg, Carl
COL
  1. Staal, Marc (2 850 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (NYR)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2019
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2275 000 000 $69 524 444 $0 $4 100 000 $5 475 556 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Kreider, Chris
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Zibanejad, Mika
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Buchnevich, Pavel
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Zuccarello, Mats
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Hayes, Kevin
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Miller, J.T.
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Söderberg, Carl
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Nash, Rick
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Vesey, Jimmy
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Desharnais, David
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Fast, Jesper
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Grabner, Michael
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Puempel, Matt
725 000 $725 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
McDonagh, Ryan
4 700 000 $4 700 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Shattenkirk, Kevin
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Lundqvist, Henrik
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Skjei, Brady
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Smith, Brendan
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Pavelec, Ondrej
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Exempté du ballottageBereglazov, Alexei
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Holden, Nick
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Deangelo, Anthony
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 juill. 2017 à 11 h 58
#1
Barathrum_Obama
I'm a Skatman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 1,044
Mentions "j'aime": 295
I've said this the last time this was posted:
when you retain money on Staal and take Söderbergs full contract you're dealing from a bad to worse position. make it the other way round and there's some use of this for the Rangers. what's the point on efficiently paying >7M for Söderberg for 3 years?
25 juill. 2017 à 12 h 6
#2
SuprDave45
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 523
Mentions "j'aime": 99
So the theory would be to trade black holes, and since mine is arguably less attractive then the picks are meant to sweeten the deal? Why am i eating money as well?
25 juill. 2017 à 12 h 8
#3
Barathrum_Obama
I'm a Skatman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 1,044
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: SuprDave45
So the theory would be to trade black holes, and since mine is arguably less attractive then the picks are meant to sweeten the deal? Why am i eating money as well?


like I've previously said, I believe Söderberg has some upside left when put in the right environment (i.e. not Colorado) and I could live with him being on the team at 50%
25 juill. 2017 à 12 h 13
#4
HeaveHo
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 26
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Barathrum_Obama
I've said this the last time this was posted:
when you retain money on Staal and take Söderbergs full contract you're dealing from a bad to worse position. make it the other way round and there's some use of this for the Rangers. what's the point on efficiently paying >7M for Söderberg for 3 years?


I think Soderberg can at least fill a position of need and open up room on the roster to play some of the young LD in the system, like Bereglazov, Graves or Day. I also think Soderberg can get back to being a 40-50 pt, two way center away from Colorado.
Quoting: SuprDave45
So the theory would be to trade black holes, and since mine is arguably less attractive then the picks are meant to sweeten the deal? Why am i eating money as well?

I think Soderberg is overpaid, but still a useful roster player. Staal on the other hand...
25 juill. 2017 à 12 h 54
#5
SuprDave45
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 523
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Quoting: HeaveHo
Quoting: Barathrum_Obama
I've said this the last time this was posted:
when you retain money on Staal and take Söderbergs full contract you're dealing from a bad to worse position. make it the other way round and there's some use of this for the Rangers. what's the point on efficiently paying >7M for Söderberg for 3 years?


I think Soderberg can at least fill a position of need and open up room on the roster to play some of the young LD in the system, like Bereglazov, Graves or Day. I also think Soderberg can get back to being a 40-50 pt, two way center away from Colorado.
Quoting: SuprDave45
So the theory would be to trade black holes, and since mine is arguably less attractive then the picks are meant to sweeten the deal? Why am i eating money as well?

I think Soderberg is overpaid, but still a useful roster player. Staal on the other hand...


Possibly, if he bounces back, yes I agree. I also think that the disgust for Staal overshadows that he is still an NHL defenseman, albeit a bad/3rd pair one who is disgustingly overpaid. hence I see the picks being the draw, but the money...makes it pointless. I would rather just keep the snow angel machine and my picks.
25 juill. 2017 à 12 h 54
#6
joseyourbrose
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 91
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Staal doesn't waive his NMC for COL
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage