SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Reunion

Créé par: Ducks92
Équipe: 2024-25 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 10 mars 2024
Publié: 11 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Carlsson, Gauthier, Zegras, McTavish, Demidov, Mintyukov, Zellweger, LaCombe.
This is the core we build around and surround them with veterans who know what it takes to win.

(I know it won't happen)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 000 000 $
31 750 000 $
21 900 000 $
11 800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
37 000 000 $
26 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Demidov, Ivan
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Coleman, Blake (2 450 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Hvidston, Connor [Liste de réserve]
  2. Leason, Brett [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
If Calgary decides to rebuild
2.
ANA
  1. Goodrow, Barclay
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
save $1.350m, PKer, good on faceoffs 54%, had chemistry w/Coleman
3.
TBL
  1. Fowler, Cam
  2. Warren, Noah
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
unprotected 1st. I like to live dangerously. (it's an overpayment I know I know)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de ANA
Logo de NYR
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2026
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NYR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $74 727 501 $0 $6 550 000 $12 772 499 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Demidov, Ivan
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance800 000 $$800K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
844 167 $844 167 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
812 500 $812 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DG/DD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 mars à 7 h 28
#1
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,518
Mentions "j'aime": 559
Calgary can't tear it down just yet, they need to wait 1 more year (don't have their own 1st rounder) but even then retaining on that trade is probably not a move they'd want to make but the value is fair enough.
TheeDjeeEem a aimé ceci.
11 mars à 7 h 51
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,539
Mentions "j'aime": 11,924
Why on earth are we trading for a 32 year old? Especially to play on the 4th line lol

I wouldn’t touch Goodrow unless it came with a whole lot of compensation of taking that contract

Tampa can’t afford Fowler, Warren is supposed to be a Cernak type guy so why not just wait on him?
11 mars à 8 h 37
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Modifié 11 mars à 8 h 46
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Why on earth are we trading for a 32 year old? Especially to play on the 4th line lol

I wouldn’t touch Goodrow unless it came with a whole lot of compensation of taking that contract

Tampa can’t afford Fowler, Warren is supposed to be a Cernak type guy so why not just wait on him?


1. Read the description. You want Ross the boss on the 4th line instead? lol.
2. Goodrow plays on the PK and Strome doesn’t. Rangers has 5th best PK. Goodrow isn’t completely useless & we can trade his last year of his contract
3. Yes they can, he’s a 3-4 years away and Verbeek said he wants to compete for a playoff spot next season
11 mars à 8 h 50
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,539
Mentions "j'aime": 11,924
Quoting: Ducks92
1. Read the description. You want Ross the boss on the 4th line instead? lol.
2. Goodrow plays on the PK and Strome doesn’t. Rangers has 5th best PK. Goodrow isn’t completely useless & we can trade his last year of his contract
3. Yes they can, he’s a 3-4 years away and Verbeek said he wants to compete for a playoff spot next season


1. Much rather Leason
2. Not every guy in the lineup had to PK man, I don’t take back what I said about Goodrow’s contract, it’s bad and we need a reason to take it on imo
3. Then why not sign a guy to placehold for Warren then? Why should we trade so much away?
11 mars à 9 h 16
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: GeneralLandro
1. Much rather Leason
2. Not every guy in the lineup had to PK man, I don’t take back what I said about Goodrow’s contract, it’s bad and we need a reason to take it on imo
3. Then why not sign a guy to placehold for Warren then? Why should we trade so much away?


“Carlsson, Gauthier, Zegras, McTavish, Demidov, Mintyukov, Zellweger, LaCombe.
This is the core we build around and surround them with veterans who know what it takes to win.”
I’m gonna put this here.

Look at Ottawa, Buffalo and New Jersey, all of them need veteran leadership. We can’t be like them.
11 mars à 10 h 32
#6
adam.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 297
Mentions "j'aime": 81
No reason for the Rangers to trade Goodrow just to take on Strome's albatross contract. Maybe if Strome was retained but Anaheim wouldn't do that. We already replaced Strome with Trocheck who is twice the player. Find another team to try to dump Strome onto
11 mars à 17 h 15
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 52
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Crazy overpay for both Coleman and Cernak, especially considering where ANA is in its rebuild.

Somehow the trade taking back Goodrow's contract is the best of the three, and even that one is brutal.
11 mars à 17 h 18
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 52
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: crimsonchin23
No reason for the Rangers to trade Goodrow just to take on Strome's albatross contract. Maybe if Strome was retained but Anaheim wouldn't do that. We already replaced Strome with Trocheck who is twice the player. Find another team to try to dump Strome onto


Three more years of Goodrow at 3.6 or three more years of Strome at 5.0, and you think Strome's contract (while an overpay) is the albatross? LOL. The Rangers offered Goodrow to anyone who would listen at the deadline.
12 mars à 13 h 23
#9
adam.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 297
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: knowerofpuck
Three more years of Goodrow at 3.6 or three more years of Strome at 5.0, and you think Strome's contract (while an overpay) is the albatross? LOL. The Rangers offered Goodrow to anyone who would listen at the deadline.


No they didn't lol. Goodrow is a valuable piece to the Rangers' playoff push. If he was offered for FC, he would be desired by at least a half dozen teams
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage