AZ laughs their arses off, they dont want campbell contract (the picks + broberg might be enough thou) leaving ingram and zucker for 2 meh prospects + 4th liner - not a chance

AZ is not trading ingram

this aint franchise mode where u have to make the value bars even. Getting rid of an average UFA and taking on a bad contract is a burden literally anyone would take for that amount of picks and prospect

so in your mind teams would want to take on a horrible contract for a few years on player that is struggling in AHL, lose their top G who is top 10 in save% and GAA (and is young under good contract), take a bunch of B prospects to get a late 1st and 3rd oh yeah and retain on rental. i find that hard to believe

There are twenty million reasons not to pick up that AHL goalie, never mind the cap hit. Does that sound like a loss budget team move? It just seems like a complete non starter to me. If they want Zucker, I'm sure it can be arranged. Why would they trade Ingram? Trying to do all those things in one trade sounds like fantasy land.

Arizona don't care about the cap. Was seeing this as Campbell, Broberg, 1st and Savoie for Ingram. Bourgault and 3rd for Zucker (have to pay up to Bourgault because of the 50% retained). Campbell can still be an NHL goalie and Ingram is cheap enough to at least battle Skinner for the starts.

Maybe it's enough as Arizona can bury cap like no other team if needed.