SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Adding the Missing Pieces - A Full Roster Speculation

Créé par: bnussle13
Équipe: 2017-18 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 5 juill. 2017
Publié: 5 juill. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
My thoughts on the missing pieces:

-------------------------------

TOP 6 FORWARD STILL MISSING -

The ducks are still missing a top 6 scoring forward. We have Eaves, but, while he did have 30 goals last season, he hasn't proven himself enough to be THE guy that the ducks need. Possible players: JVR, Duchene, Jagr, Jokinen, Vanek

Why Vanek:
Vanek has proved to be a top 6 forward many times in his career. He is also a free agent so there is nothing that has to be given up other than cap space to sign him. Put his size and shot along Getzlaf and it's almost like having a budget Perry on the team. The only thing that is a factor against is his age. At 33, he is just starting his decline, and as long as Vanek isn't trying to be locked up long term, an affordable two year contract is something to look into. If he doesn't preform, trade him. There is definitely a chance that Vanek could shine once again in Anaheim.

------------------------------------------------------------

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE! -

Another top 9 winger? Something that every Stanley cup team has had in recent years. Scoring depth is needed for every cup team, so the ducks will need to treat their top 9 as a 9 player top 6 if they want to be competitive with the likes of the Blackhawks, Penguins, (Capitals?), Canadiens, and other cup teams.

Try Ritchie, leave it for the deadline:
Nick Ritchie has been trying his darndest to crack the top 6 on the ducks. He has the size and speed, he just needs to improve his puck handling abilities. This is a good decision to make, seeing Ritchie already has the chemistry with Perry, and we have seen in games how well he cycles the puck. Maybe at the deadline a possible move for a player that can make plays alongside Rakell and Perry. For now, giving Ritchie a chance in his contract year to prove himself could remove the need to find that last part of the top 9.

----------------------------------------------------------

VATANEN? -

What should we do with Vatanen? Well, seeing that he will most likely be put on IR once the season starts, for now, nothing. Or something. The most important thing is to not undersell Vats. It is not a pressing issue to get him out of Anaheim, where the only player that Vatanen could get pushed out for is Jacob Larsson. The young Swede would most likely be totally fine playing another year on San Diego's top D pairing. Bieksa's contract is also up in a year as well. With Kevin most likely going in a year, there is plenty of room for Larsson to make his way into the NHL roster. The only reason Vatanen should go is if there is an absolutely amazing opportunity to fill out that last spot in the top 9.

-------------------------------------------------------------

KERDILES OVER KASE:

I know, I like Kase too. He looked like he knew what he was doing while he was playing alongside a former league MVP, and i absolutely have respect for the kid. But, There's no room for him. If we are going to let Ritchie play in the top 6, Kase would then have to play 4th line and have no special team minutes, which at that point, I would rather him just play top 6 AHL minutes. As for Kerdiles, the local two-way forward is a great 4th liner for this next season. He has the grit to jump in with the likes of Wagner, and the ability to be deadly alongside Vermette. He also is a great penalty killer, so that gives the ducks more options on the PK. In the future, he could take Cogliano's spot as the premier penalty killer.

------------------------------------------------------------

GIBSON VS MILLER -
Murray was smart for this one. All we can really hope happens for this one is Randy Carlyle plays Gibson for most games and saves Miller for the important games where poise is needed. We can cross the playoff bridge when we get there.

//////////////////////////////////////////////

How did I do? Feedback would be much appreciated. Go Ducks!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2375 000 000 $63 991 750 $0 $850 000 $11 008 250 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 1
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
8 625 000 $8 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 1
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
637 500 $637 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 2
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 3
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
2 437 500 $2 437 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 juill. 2017 à 21 h 12
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7
Mentions "j'aime": 1
As an outsider, the Ducks need another high end scorer if they want to win another championship, their defense is phenomenal, but if a Vatanen can somehow get you a Duchene, JVR, Galchenyuk, etc. in a package I would do that all day. The Ducks don't really have enough scoring to compete with the bigger teams like Nashville (better defense), Pittsburgh, Edmonton, Toronto, Tampa Bay. If they add that then I think they can compete for a cup legitimately
5 juill. 2017 à 22 h 27
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 31
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: jhmiddleton81
As an outsider, the Ducks need another high end scorer if they want to win another championship, their defense is phenomenal, but if a Vatanen can somehow get you a Duchene, JVR, Galchenyuk, etc. in a package I would do that all day. The Ducks don't really have enough scoring to compete with the bigger teams like Nashville (better defense), Pittsburgh, Edmonton, Toronto, Tampa Bay. If they add that then I think they can compete for a cup legitimately


While I do agree with needing a high quality scoring winger, I also believe that trading Vatanen would downgrade the ducks defense, no matter who you got to replace him from FA. If there was a way for us to get another defender with Vatanen's ability, then I would be fine with getting rid of him, but since he's on IR, there's not really a rush to get rid of him right now
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage