SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade with MTL

Créé par: Meek91
Équipe: 2017-18 Predators de Nashville
Date de création initiale: 5 juill. 2017
Publié: 5 juill. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
67 250 000 $
55 000 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
14 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
2019
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de COL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
2020
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2475 000 000 $69 928 685 $0 $682 500 $5 071 315 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
912 500 $912 500 $
C
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 5
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
625 000 $625 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 5
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
612 500 $612 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 9
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
692 500 $692 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
G
UFA - 1
2 982 375 $2 982 375 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 juill. 2017 à 13 h 32
#1
Alex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 316
Mentions "j'aime": 32
awful trade on nashvilles end
5 juill. 2017 à 13 h 35
#2
Démarrer sujet
Meek91
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 1
danault is like a younger cheaper version of johanson. Weber is obviously going to stack an already strong D. and Shaws style of game fits right in with nashvilles play style. (please ignore awful grammar) (too lazy to be punctual today) You obviously sending away a lot of talent. But i think in the long run it could work out well for them.
5 juill. 2017 à 13 h 39
#3
Alex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 316
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: Meek91
danault is like a younger cheaper version of johanson. Weber is obviously going to stack an already strong D. and Shaws style of game fits right in with nashvilles play style. (please ignore awful grammar) (too lazy to be punctual today) You obviously sending away a lot of talent. But i think in the long run it could work out well for them.


Johansen > Dannault
Arvidsson > Shaw
Ekholm > Weber (Strictly for cap reasons)
5 juill. 2017 à 14 h 12
#4
Démarrer sujet
Meek91
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Then why not
Danault>Johansen (for cap reasons)
Shaw > Arvidsson (for cap reasons)
Weber>Ekholm (cuz Weber is a good #1 d man and Ekholm is for some reason made out to be better than he is since he gets 3 goals and 21 pts a year)
5 juill. 2017 à 14 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Lollllllllll

I don't if you ever seen Danault played? Because he is a third line center but if you want to give us johansen..we could take him?
5 juill. 2017 à 15 h 7
#6
PredsWingsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 517
Mentions "j'aime": 198
This is a horrible trade for Nashville. Weber is gone and Nashville had their best season.. They will continue to move forward. Also Jagr will get closer to $3M if he plays and thats probably why no one is looking at him yet. Fisher would play for $2M if it meant he could play hockey in Nashville. Its not about money for him (obviously)
5 juill. 2017 à 17 h 16
#7
Démarrer sujet
Meek91
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 1
They didnt have their best season because weber was gone. They had their best season because they got hot at the right time. Jagr is probably worth the money. Danault spent a lot of time centering the first line in montreal so i wouldnt necessarily consider him a 3C. He is very capable of centering a top line. You can disagree with the trade, doesnt necessarily mean its a "bad" trade. Im not even a preds fan, i just think it would be a better move in the long run. Use the cap space you save from losing johansen and arvidsson and go get driasaitl or however you spell it lol.
5 juill. 2017 à 17 h 57
#8
Alex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 316
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: Meek91
Then why not
Danault>Johansen (for cap reasons)
Shaw > Arvidsson (for cap reasons)
Weber>Ekholm (cuz Weber is a good #1 d man and Ekholm is for some reason made out to be better than he is since he gets 3 goals and 21 pts a year)


Then why not
Danault>Johansen (for cap reasons) Johansen will hardly break the bank with his next contract
Shaw>Arvidsson (for cap reasons) Shaw makes more money than Arvidsson lol
Weber>Ekholm (cuz Weber is a good #1 d man and Ekholm is for some reason made out to be better than he is since he gets 3 goals and 21 pts a year) Imagine thinking points determine who a good defenseman is
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage