SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Couple more changes

Créé par: KPasty
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 19 juill. 2023
Publié: 22 juill. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 015 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Labanc, Kevin
Détails additionnels:
Trade after Myers signing bonus paid.
2.
CAR
  1. Beauvillier, Anthony
  2. Rathbone, Jack
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Top 10 Protected
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2026
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $81 020 417 $850 000 $0 $2 479 583 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
2 015 000 $2 015 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 juill. 2023 à 18 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,126
Mentions "j'aime": 2,235
I'm not in love with acquiring Pesce. Value is probably fair (I don't really want to move a first but if you want a great player you have to pay) but I don't understand it. Canucks have Hronek for now and Willander coming up and I personally feel like Pesce just clogs his development
22 juill. 2023 à 18 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Value is probably ok but don’t see how this really helps canes (unless they’re flipping assets). Beau is redundant and doesn’t move needle based on canes structure and setup already. Rathbone probably doesn’t crack roster long term and def doesn’t short term. The first is nice but again unless they’re using it in a separate deal it doesn’t really make sense.
22 juill. 2023 à 18 h 59
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,140
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: Warpbox
I'm not in love with acquiring Pesce. Value is probably fair (I don't really want to move a first but if you want a great player you have to pay) but I don't understand it. Canucks have Hronek for now and Willander coming up and I personally feel like Pesce just clogs his development


Agree to an extent, but Wallinder is 2-3 years out. Canucks have a core imo to start competing now and should. Hronek is great but shouldn’t be playing with Hughes as he excels with a defensively sound partner much like Hughes does. So bringing in Pesce solidifies the top 4.
Warpbox a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2023 à 19 h 0
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,140
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: vikhodush
Value is probably ok but don’t see how this really helps canes (unless they’re flipping assets). Beau is redundant and doesn’t move needle based on canes structure and setup already. Rathbone probably doesn’t crack roster long term and def doesn’t short term. The first is nice but again unless they’re using it in a separate deal it doesn’t really make sense.


I’d say this scenario would be if canes went out and got Karlsson. The 1st gets flipped to SJ and EK65 takes Pesce’s spot.
22 juill. 2023 à 19 h 2
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,126
Mentions "j'aime": 2,235
Quoting: KPasty
Agree to an extent, but Wallinder is 2-3 years out. Canucks have a core imo to start competing now and should. Hronek is great but shouldn’t be playing with Hughes as he excels with a defensively sound partner much like Hughes does. So bringing in Pesce solidifies the top 4.


My opinion is that you can't afford to pay for a high quality D partner for Hughes. You can't do this without extending Pesce because you can't afford to trade for a UFA, but if you extend him what do you do when Willander is ready? If Pesce was looking for a short term extension you can do it but if not I don't think it's worth it in the future.
22 juill. 2023 à 19 h 8
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,140
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: Warpbox
My opinion is that you can't afford to pay for a high quality D partner for Hughes. You can't do this without extending Pesce because you can't afford to trade for a UFA, but if you extend him what do you do when Willander is ready? If Pesce was looking for a short term extension you can do it but if not I don't think it's worth it in the future.


Like I said, Wallinder 2-3 out still, then realistically 4-5 before pushing for a top 4 spot. Can’t build a team to start winning now when your waiting on potential 4-5 years down the line. I get the excitement with him but expectations need to be tempered (Juolevi)
Warpbox a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage