SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

They could still get EK and a Goal Scorer

Créé par: Beachcaniac
Équipe: 2023-24 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 1 juill. 2023
Publié: 1 juill. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Having a little fun with a 3 team trade to bring in EK and Tarasenko.

SJ and ANA each eat 25% of EK's contract and get pieces in return.

Teuvo is the main piece that has to go back to SJ because of cap. Honestly not sure what they would require after that. Cost does go down some because they are not eating more of his cap hit.

ANA main piece that has to go back is Skjei, other pieces can change depending upon what ANA truly wants by being willing to eat 25% of EK's cap hit for 4 years. Also helps them get to the cap foor a little more for this upcoming season.


Acquiring EK would get rid of the TDA deal that is in place, allow us to sign a scorer, bring in a 4C, have some money for depth signings and have some cap left.

Point is that they could still get EK as reported still after today and sign a true scorer. Wether it is short term or long term with the way the cap is projected to go up.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
15 750 000 $
11 100 000 $
1850 000 $
Transactions
1.
CAR
  1. Karlsson, Erik (5 750 000 $ retained)
SJS
  1. Grudinin, Vladimir [Liste de réserve]
  2. Gunler, Noel
  3. Teräväinen, Teuvo
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
2.
CAR
ANA
  1. Drury, Jack
  2. Skjei, Brady
  3. Suzuki, Ryan
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (CAR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
2025
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
2026
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $79 704 417 $450 000 $500 000 $3 795 583 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 460 250 $8 460 250 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
RFA - 1
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 820 000 $4 820 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 juill. 2023 à 21 h 20
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 51
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Why is ANA getting a super similar (debatably better)return while they are giving up no players and taking less salary cap?
ecupirate07 a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2023 à 21 h 50
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: wi11dabeast
Why is ANA getting a super similar (debatably better)return while they are giving up no players and taking less salary cap?


They take 25% of his cap the same as San Jose. The main pieces were based off what both San Jose and ANA would potentially want roster wise right now ( not saying the prospects or Dury is what either team would want, that is interchangable). ANA would want more because its 4 years of cap at 2,875,000 they would be eating. Also the cap casualties of Skjei and Teuvo were needed to address what I feel the Canes look to do ( reported short term offer earlier today to Tarasenko).
1 juill. 2023 à 22 h 8
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Don’t think you’re getting a second team to eat 4 years of retention. The return to ANA isn’t bad but that’s a long time.
1 juill. 2023 à 22 h 16
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: vikhodush
Don’t think you’re getting a second team to eat 4 years of retention. The return to ANA isn’t bad but that’s a long time.


Actually, with the Pittsburgh rumor from earlier, the Athletic reported from a Pens source that a third mystery team was involved in a 3 team trade talks with the Pens and San Jose. So its is very very possible whether its ANA or another team. I just choose ANA because of their cap situation and window, in particular with the cap rising substantially next season hopefully.
1 juill. 2023 à 22 h 19
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: Beachcaniac
Actually, with the Pittsburgh rumor from earlier, the Athletic reported from a Pens source that a third mystery team was involved in a 3 team trade talks with the Pens and San Jose. So its is very very possible whether its ANA or another team. I just choose ANA because of their cap situation and window, in particular with the cap rising substantially next season hopefully.


Got ya. Hasn’t read that yet but makes sense. Did they say it was for further retention on EK or just another team where assets/contracts can be moved around for additional flexibility? Like is it to dump granlund for example to create space or is it to launder EK cap hit.
1 juill. 2023 à 22 h 26
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: vikhodush
Got ya. Hasn’t read that yet but makes sense. Did they say it was for further retention on EK or just another team where assets/contracts can be moved around for additional flexibility? Like is it to dump granlund for example to create space or is it to launder EK cap hit.


Heres the quote. "Dubas engaged in talks with San Jose’s star (and very expensive) defensemen Erik Karlsson, a team source who requested anonymity so they could speak freely confirmed to The Athletic. A deal to Pittsburgh, which now appears more unlikely following the spending spree that followed, would have been complex and included a mystery team along with the Penguins and Sharks."

As you can see it doesn't state whether its retention or assets/contracts. Could be looked at either way, but I understand your point as well. Its a long long time. With my proposal, San Jose could eat more and get more out of it. Just from what I've read is that Grier doesn't want to retain half of EK's contract which is why I went the path that I did for EK.
vikhodush a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2023 à 22 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: Beachcaniac
Heres the quote. "Dubas engaged in talks with San Jose’s star (and very expensive) defensemen Erik Karlsson, a team source who requested anonymity so they could speak freely confirmed to The Athletic. A deal to Pittsburgh, which now appears more unlikely following the spending spree that followed, would have been complex and included a mystery team along with the Penguins and Sharks."

As you can see it doesn't state whether its retention or assets/contracts. Could be looked at either way, but I understand your point as well. Its a long long time. With my proposal, San Jose could eat more and get more out of it. Just from what I've read is that Grier doesn't want to retain half of EK's contract which is why I went the path that I did for EK.


Makes sense. Griers stance doesn’t really make sense. If he eats closer to half he’ll get more teams in and get way more for EK. They’re not going to come out of the rebuild until year 4 anyways and by that point the cap will have gone up so % taken by retention won’t be as significant. Seems like he’s a bit short sighted unless I’m just not seeing his rationale.
Beachcaniac a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2023 à 22 h 44
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: vikhodush
Makes sense. Griers stance doesn’t really make sense. If he eats closer to half he’ll get more teams in and get way more for EK. They’re not going to come out of the rebuild until year 4 anyways and by that point the cap will have gone up so % taken by retention won’t be as significant. Seems like he’s a bit short sighted unless I’m just not seeing his rationale.


I agree with you on Griers stance. He hurt himself a little more today buy other potential suitors going elsewhere for their Offensive defenseman needs / spending money on other parts of the roster. Typically I feel like Orlov's signing would take us out, but as you know DW keeps pushing for EK and who knows what else. Since Orlov is meant for Skjei followed by Nikishin.
vikhodush a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage