SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blockbuster

Créé par: Isles10
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 8 déc. 2022
Publié: 9 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYI
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $80 859 584 $1 250 000 $2 165 000 $1 640 416 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 150 000 $6 150 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 déc. 2022 à 0 h 31
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 3,623
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: oliver_wahlstrom
McDavid, Matthews, Mackinnon, Draisatl, Larkin, Point, Crosby, Tage Thompson, Barkov, Aho, Hughes, Stamkos (depending on what you count him as), Mika, Suzuki, ROR, Thomas, Barzal, Eichel, Hertl, Hintz, Lindholm. Then a few more like Hischier, Malkin, and Scheifele.

That is 21 that are better. Then three more that have arguments.

I get it, I love Petterson too. But this is not an argument over whether he is good or not, just analyzing the fact that centers are easier to replace than right-shot defenseman. I said this above but the 30th best center in the NHL (in my rankings) is Anthony Cirelli, the 30th best RD was Ceci/Tanev. The drop off after the top 4 and top 9 RD is just so drastic


i would take petey over a LOT of the players you listed. and i mean a LOT.
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
10 déc. 2022 à 2 h 27
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,322
Mentions "j'aime": 3,987
Quoting: Juiceman
Ain't no way Larkin, Suzuki, Thomas, Barzal, Hertl, or Lindholm are better than Pettersson. Just absolutely no way. Hischier, Malkin and Scheifele are all worse. Even ROR is declining.


Lindholm and Scheifele may be better. But they also play(ed) with pretty noteworthy linemates.
Pettersson has played this season with Kuzmenko and Mikh... and last year was all over the place with different makeshift lines.

A lot of those centers, while quality, are a reach just to prove an argument though.
10 déc. 2022 à 9 h 16
#28
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 4,817
Mentions "j'aime": 2,007
Quoting: Juiceman
Ain't no way Larkin, Suzuki, Thomas, Barzal, Hertl, or Lindholm are better than Pettersson. Just absolutely no way. Hischier, Malkin and Scheifele are all worse. Even ROR is declining.


Larkin, Suzuki, Thomas and Lindholm easily are. Barzal and Hertl are both very close but are better. And lets just take your argument, that still has Petey outside of the top 15 lmao. Yet nobody disputetd the fact that Dobson is without a doubt a top 11 RD
10 déc. 2022 à 9 h 18
#29
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 4,817
Mentions "j'aime": 2,007
Quoting: bagelbob
i would take petey over a LOT of the players you listed. and i mean a LOT.


yet you didnt mention them lmao.
Quoting: Wqrrior
Lindholm and Scheifele may be better. But they also play(ed) with pretty noteworthy linemates.
Pettersson has played this season with Kuzmenko and Mikh... and last year was all over the place with different makeshift lines.

A lot of those centers, while quality, are a reach just to prove an argument though.


It is even more than this lol. I used GAR, xGAR, xOFF and more to prove my point as well. Look at point production and Petterson is even worse. Yall are just completley blinded.

Nonetheless, nobody even argued the fact that Dobson's 3x4mil with a slightly over 4 mil QO versus Petey's 2 year deal with a nearly 10.5 mil QO...
10 déc. 2022 à 11 h 17
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 3,623
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: oliver_wahlstrom
yet you didnt mention them lmao.

It is even more than this lol. I used GAR, xGAR, xOFF and more to prove my point as well. Look at point production and Petterson is even worse. Yall are just completley blinded.

Nonetheless, nobody even argued the fact that Dobson's 3x4mil with a slightly over 4 mil QO versus Petey's 2 year deal with a nearly 10.5 mil QO...


i’ll go. the only two players with a higher GAR total per evolving hockey than petey this year are jack eichel and matthew tkachuk. the guys i’d take over petey are mcdavid, matthews, mackinnon, drai, eichel, and crosby, assuming we’re talking literally today and not for the long term. he’d be a toss-up with barkov and hughes in that next group
Isles10 a aimé ceci.
10 déc. 2022 à 11 h 44
#31
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 4,817
Mentions "j'aime": 2,007
Quoting: bagelbob
i’ll go. the only two players with a higher GAR total per evolving hockey than petey this year are jack eichel and matthew tkachuk. the guys i’d take over petey are mcdavid, matthews, mackinnon, drai, eichel, and crosby, assuming we’re talking literally today and not for the long term. he’d be a toss-up with barkov and hughes in that next group


adjust for TOI lmao. He is 38th this season among centers for xGAR adjusted per 60 minutes and 16th for GAR. Tt is great to be able to play a lot but efficiency matters lmao. Also xGAR is a far superior stat which he is 7th in, but again xGAR per 60 is superior.

Also he has never finished in the top 20 for centers in a season in the last three years for xGAR (adjusted per 60 or not)
21-22: 21st in xGAR
20-21: Outside of top 80 centers in xGAR

I mean come on lol. Hughes and Barkov solo and its not even close. Petterson has gotten completely overrated.

Again, his QO of 10.5+ is insane.
10 déc. 2022 à 12 h 35
#32
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: oliver_wahlstrom
Larkin, Suzuki, Thomas and Lindholm easily are. Barzal and Hertl are both very close but are better. And lets just take your argument, that still has Petey outside of the top 15 lmao. Yet nobody disputetd the fact that Dobson is without a doubt a top 11 RD


Larkin is a high end 2C. He is closer to Bo Horvat than Elias Pettersson. Barzal is absolutely not better than Pettersson, neither is Suzuki or Thomas... Elias Pettersson outproduced Suzuki last year despite being injuerd for half the year. Pettersson is also better defensively. There is also no way you think Thomas is better. He had one very good season, but Pettersson has easily been better over their career, and is much better this year. Pettersson is easily better offensively, and Thomas is a defensive liability. No kidding there are more centers better than Pettersson than there are RD better than Dobson. There is a lot less competition for RD. Doesn't mean Dobson is the better player.
10 déc. 2022 à 12 h 37
#33
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Wqrrior
Lindholm and Scheifele may be better. But they also play(ed) with pretty noteworthy linemates.
Pettersson has played this season with Kuzmenko and Mikh... and last year was all over the place with different makeshift lines.

A lot of those centers, while quality, are a reach just to prove an argument though.


Pettersson would be putting up 120 playing beside Tkachuk and Gaudreau. Look at Lindholm now. Not nearly as succesful now that his star linemates are gone
10 déc. 2022 à 12 h 38
#34
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 4,817
Mentions "j'aime": 2,007
Quoting: Juiceman
Larkin is a high end 2C. He is closer to Bo Horvat than Elias Pettersson. Barzal is absolutely not better than Pettersson, neither is Suzuki or Thomas... Elias Pettersson outproduced Suzuki last year despite being injuerd for half the year. Pettersson is also better defensively. There is also no way you think Thomas is better. He had one very good season, but Pettersson has easily been better over their career, and is much better this year. Pettersson is easily better offensively, and Thomas is a defensive liability. No kidding there are more centers better than Pettersson than there are RD better than Dobson. There is a lot less competition for RD. Doesn't mean Dobson is the better player.


Never said Dobson was better. I said he was more valuable lol.

And the fact that there is "less competiton" is not the point you think it is. The complete lack of RD gives Dobson invaluable worth.
10 déc. 2022 à 12 h 50
#35
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: oliver_wahlstrom
Never said Dobson was better. I said he was more valuable lol.

And the fact that there is "less competiton" is not the point you think it is. The complete lack of RD gives Dobson invaluable worth.


How many of those top centers better than Pettersson are U24? Dobson is valuable no doubt, however so is an elite 1C who likely hasn’t even entered his prime years yet
10 déc. 2022 à 14 h 34
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,322
Mentions "j'aime": 3,987
Quoting: Juiceman
How many of those top centers better than Pettersson are U24? Dobson is valuable no doubt, however so is an elite 1C who likely hasn’t even entered his prime years yet


Advanced stat people only care to interpret stats the way they want to interpret them. This argument in all is like talking to a brick wall. Waste of time.
Juiceman a aimé ceci.
10 déc. 2022 à 15 h 43
#37
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 4,817
Mentions "j'aime": 2,007
Quoting: Juiceman
How many of those top centers better than Pettersson are U24? Dobson is valuable no doubt, however so is an elite 1C who likely hasn’t even entered his prime years yet


Quoting: Wqrrior
Advanced stat people only care to interpret stats the way they want to interpret them. This argument in all is like talking to a brick wall. Waste of time.


lmaooo i never once said that Petterson wasn't elite or an elite asset. He is 1000%.

My sole point was that an elite 22-year old RD on a 3x4 deal with ARB at just over 4 mil is worth more than an elite center on a 2x7.350 with ARB at just over 10.5 mil

I used logic, i used rankings, I used advanced stats and regular stats. My argument was never once that Peterson is worse than Dobson or that he is not elite, he is a franchise #1 asset to build a team around, but positional value would prevent the Islanders from moving on from Dobson.
10 déc. 2022 à 18 h 23
#38
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: oliver_wahlstrom
lmaooo i never once said that Petterson wasn't elite or an elite asset. He is 1000%.

My sole point was that an elite 22-year old RD on a 3x4 deal with ARB at just over 4 mil is worth more than an elite center on a 2x7.350 with ARB at just over 10.5 mil

I used logic, i used rankings, I used advanced stats and regular stats. My argument was never once that Peterson is worse than Dobson or that he is not elite, he is a franchise #1 asset to build a team around, but positional value would prevent the Islanders from moving on from Dobson.


At the end of the day, different teams have different needs. Different teams will prefer the center over the defenseman and vice versa. It isn’t like McDavid being more valuable than Anderson. That is just a fact.
10 déc. 2022 à 18 h 26
#39
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 4,817
Mentions "j'aime": 2,007
Quoting: Juiceman
At the end of the day, different teams have different needs. Different teams will prefer the center over the defenseman and vice versa. It isn’t like McDavid being more valuable than Anderson. That is just a fact.


Well the Canucks right side is Schenn-Bear-Myers and the Islanders centers are Barzal-Nelson-Pageau-Cizikas with our top two prospects being centers, along with Wahlstrom being a natural center.

I get why the canucks would do it, no reason for the islanders to pay the price of a center just to move them to wing
10 déc. 2022 à 18 h 28
#40
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: oliver_wahlstrom
Well the Canucks right side is Schenn-Bear-Myers and the Islanders centers are Barzal-Nelson-Pageau-Cizikas with our top two prospects being centers, along with Wahlstrom being a natural center.

I get why the canucks would do it, no reason for the islanders to pay the price of a center just to move them to wing


Horvat is an expiring UFA and Miller is not a good center. Trading Pettersson would leave Curtis Lazar as our 1C. Not ideal
10 déc. 2022 à 18 h 55
#41
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 4,817
Mentions "j'aime": 2,007
Quoting: Juiceman
Horvat is an expiring UFA and Miller is not a good center. Trading Pettersson would leave Curtis Lazar as our 1C. Not ideal


and im not the one who said Peterson should get traded lol.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage