SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mr Juicys Offseason

Créé par: Mr_juicy
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 16 mai 2022
Publié: 16 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Based on having the timeline that we will compete for the playoffs the following season. Also assuming Myers/OEL are unmovable. Zucker/Monahan acquired along with assets, hoping that they would rebound somewhat and perhaps be able to be moved for an asset at the deadline. If not, their contracts expire after this season. Roster is still good enough to be competitive, outside shot at challenging for a playoff spot.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
2925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
56 750 000 $
1750 000 $
2750 000 $
2900 000 $
2950 000 $
1750 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Kravtsov, Vitali [Droits de RFA]
  2. Lundkvist, Nils
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
3.
4.
VAN
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de EDM
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $78 639 167 $1 250 000 $1 150 000 $3 860 833 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 mai 2022 à 18 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 2,771
Mentions "j'aime": 1,386
VAN would much rather keep Schenn, They value him immensely also he is stable partner for Hughes. VAN is also looking to re-sign Boeser. Not the return VAN would want for Miller. Monahan is a walking band-aid and is probably LTIR.
16 mai 2022 à 19 h 0
#2
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,655
Mentions "j'aime": 6,758
You got a deal, Rangers accept.
16 mai 2022 à 19 h 56
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Rangers have no cap space to re-sign Miller, so no thanks. He's not worth that much for 1 season.
16 mai 2022 à 20 h 17
#4
BoeserMania
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Nucks say no to the Pens trade... maybe Garland but not Boeser

I think the value for Miller is fair though
17 mai 2022 à 11 h 59
#5
Démarrer sujet
D. Juicy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: PeterForsberg21
VAN would much rather keep Schenn, They value him immensely also he is stable partner for Hughes. VAN is also looking to re-sign Boeser. Not the return VAN would want for Miller. Monahan is a walking band-aid and is probably LTIR.


1. Trading Schenn is because Marino was acquired. If they want to play Rathbone, there's not enough room on D. Marino would stylistically be a good fit for Hughes as well. This is based on OEL and Myers being unable to be moved. He is great value for his contract but let's not kid ourselves, he is what he is. If you can get value for him and replace him with someone better (like Marino), it's a no brainer.
2. They're looking to re-sign him if it's a reasonable deal. They were also exploring trading him throughout the season. This deal is to take on some additional cap short term, while upgrading the D and ditching the Poolman contract. PIT might be interested if they are willing to give it one more go. Zucker is a cap dump at this point, but perhaps playing top 6 increases his value enough to move him for something at the deadline.
3. Not ideally, but this is a realistic trade. If nothing else presents itself, and his contract demands are too high, he should be moved. This at least adds a pick and a couple of decent prospects. I agree that in a perfect world, you would want more, but I'm trying to be conservative with the trades.
4. Taking Monahan for a pick is to get an asset for the future, see if there's a chance he can bounce back (might be a small chance, but a chance nonetheless). Maybe he plays well enough to contribute and perhaps bump his value up to the point where he can be moved at the deadline with retention for another asset. I haven't read anywhere that suggests he will be on LTIR for the year so not sure where you are getting that from. He was already playing poorly, more chance of optimism from this surgery than not.

These trades are based on setting yourself up for playoffs in 2 years. This year they need to think long term, get some assets and clear cap. I think this roster is still good enough to potentially contend for a playoff spot.
PeterForsberg21 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage