SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

trying to move oel garbage contract

Créé par: potato_p
Publié: 2 mai 2022 à 23 h 32
Plafond salarial: 81 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 40/200 (20%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a rempli les différents critères exigés par le registraire central de la LNH.

Logo de Ducks d'AnaheimDucks d'Anaheim

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Kesler, RyanDucks d'AnaheimIR-1 375 000 $011---0000--
Moore, JohnDucks d'AnaheimMineures-325 000 $011---7011--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Ekman-Larsson, OliverCanucks de VancouverLNH-1 452 000 $011---7952429--
Höglander, NilsExempté du ballottageCanucks de VancouverIR-178 333 $011---6010818--
Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Canucks de VancouverVAN)---010------
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial11 490 191 $23466341011
Variation69 667 $100010
Final11 559 858 $ (↑)24 (↑)4663411 (↑)11153146

Logo de Canucks de VancouverCanucks de Vancouver

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Ekman-Larsson, OliverCanucks de VancouverLNH-7 260 000 $011---7952429--
Höglander, NilsExempté du ballottageCanucks de VancouverIR-891 667 $011---6010818--
Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Canucks de VancouverVAN)---010------
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Kesler, RyanDucks d'AnaheimIR-6 875 000 $011---0000--
Moore, JohnDucks d'AnaheimMineures-1 625 000 $011---7011--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial1 871 389 $2047673512
Variation-348 333 $-1000-10
Final1 523 056 $ (↓)19 (↓)476734 (↓)12-15-31-46
2 mai 2022 à 23 h 39
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,650
Mentions "j'aime": 12,028
Nowhere near enough — like not even close
2 mai 2022 à 23 h 42
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 20
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Nowhere near enough


what do we have to add, pearson? a second?
2 mai 2022 à 23 h 44
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 20
Quoting: potato_p
what do we have to add, pearson? a second?


hell you can take miller at 50% retained if you want
2 mai 2022 à 23 h 51
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,650
Mentions "j'aime": 12,028
Quoting: potato_p
what do we have to add, pearson? a second?


Way more. We don’t need or want that contract on our books. Look at going rates — Verbeek was going to get a 2nd for ~5 million of Dadonov soooooo
3 mai 2022 à 3 h 36
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Way more. We don’t need or want that contract on our books. Look at going rates — Verbeek was going to get a 2nd for ~5 million of Dadonov soooooo


First of all, have you at least considered how well OEL has played this season? The only sore spot with OEL's contract is the amount of term, he's been well well worth most of his salary. Not full value, but a good majority of his salary. Canucks wouldn't give up Hoglander if it meant unloading OEL, and you realize their asking price on Hoglander is very high right?
3 mai 2022 à 3 h 36
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: potato_p
hell you can take miller at 50% retained if you want


That should be enough to unload OEL by itself, clearly you don't appreciate how good OEL has actually played
3 mai 2022 à 8 h 3
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,650
Mentions "j'aime": 12,028
Quoting: Knuckl3s
First of all, have you at least considered how well OEL has played this season? The only sore spot with OEL's contract is the amount of term, he's been well well worth most of his salary. Not full value, but a good majority of his salary. Canucks wouldn't give up Hoglander if it meant unloading OEL, and you realize their asking price on Hoglander is very high right?


Haven’t considered any because I want nothing to do with that contract
3 mai 2022 à 11 h 46
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,946
Quoting: Knuckl3s
First of all, have you at least considered how well OEL has played this season? The only sore spot with OEL's contract is the amount of term, he's been well well worth most of his salary. Not full value, but a good majority of his salary. Canucks wouldn't give up Hoglander if it meant unloading OEL, and you realize their asking price on Hoglander is very high right?


Anaheim is the wrong trade partner. The Ducks likely only want short-term cap dumps. Makes no sense to do this if it isn't for a significant overpay and this would unnecessarily complicate the cap situation next summer.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
3 mai 2022 à 13 h 40
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 20
Quoting: Knuckl3s
That should be enough to unload OEL by itself, clearly you don't appreciate how good OEL has actually played


oel has been good, but he's past his prime getting paid like a top 5 defenseman and has many many years left on his contract
3 mai 2022 à 18 h 16
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: potato_p
oel has been good, but he's past his prime getting paid like a top 5 defenseman and has many many years left on his contract


Past his prime eh? Or so we assume
3 mai 2022 à 18 h 32
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Haven’t considered any because I want nothing to do with that contract


Fine, but who knows what Verbeek thinks
3 mai 2022 à 19 h 29
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,650
Mentions "j'aime": 12,028
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Fine, but who knows what Verbeek thinks


Well he has said he will not overpay or give crazy terms to older players so why would be trade for one that is old expensive and expensive for a long time — I’d bet the house he wouldn’t ever do it
4 mai 2022 à 0 h 57
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Well he has said he will not overpay or give crazy terms to older players so why would be trade for one that is old expensive and expensive for a long time — I’d bet the house he wouldn’t ever do it


If you've heard it from the horses mouth, then that's that I guess
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage