SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

small time moves

Créé par: gary_bettman
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 24 sept. 2021
Publié: 24 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Kane gets put on waivers then sent down/whatever. Sharks are clearly not going to welcome him back even if he's innocent.

DISCLAIMER: Sharks fans are well aware a rebuild is needed but we're also aware management isn't going to do it. So maybe try not to flood this with comments like: "sharks have bad contracts" or "sharks are terrible they need to rebuild and sell everyone for terrible returns". I'd like to one day see some thought put into comments and not just regurgitating the same things people have said on the internet for YEARS. We know.
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
2.
SJS
  1. Kessel, Phil (1 500 000 $ retained)
ARI
  1. Pasichnuk, Brinson
  2. Simek, Radim
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SEA
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $67 677 863 $0 $507 500 $13 822 137 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 sept. 2021 à 12 h 11
#1
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
To relinquish kessel retained ~and~ take on simek (though easily buryable) it's gotta be at least a bunch of interesting futures like pasichnuk

Just don't see AZ being terribly interested in that

Tho it does seem like they have low self esteem rn
24 sept. 2021 à 12 h 13
#2
yippee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,171
Hey just letting you know the sharks have bad contracts, also the sharks are terrible they need to rebuild and sell everyone for terrible returns.

jk jk but for real the Kessel pickup looks like a good idea considering management's attitude towards the team, just that Arizona would probably want a little more coming back to them. Maybe a prospect or an upgrade to one of the picks.
gary_bettman a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2021 à 12 h 16
#3
Démarrer sujet
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Quoting: Radu47
To relinquish kessel retained ~and~ take on simek (though easily buryable) it's gotta be at least a bunch of interesting futures like pasichnuk

Just don't see AZ being terribly interested in that

Tho it does seem like they have low self esteem rn


Realistically they wouldn't get a "bunch" of prospects for one year of Kessel. I would totally send Pasichnuk as well, though.
24 sept. 2021 à 12 h 47
#4
total_knut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 255
Mentions "j'aime": 106
I think you nailed it with "fans are well aware that a rebuild is needed but management won't do it" and therefore step #1 to fixing things is to let Ron Wilson go. It's not that he's a bad GM, but his expiry date with the Sharks has passed. If that move gets made first, then a lot of other moves will follow....moves that Ron Wilson won't currently make. As long as Wilson is still in charge no profound improvements can happen. The problem is at the top.

If this is repeating others from past posts I apologize....I don't follow this site nearly as much as others to know what others are saying.
24 sept. 2021 à 12 h 50
#5
Démarrer sujet
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Quoting: total_knut
I think you nailed it with "fans are well aware that a rebuild is needed but management won't do it" and therefore step #1 to fixing things is to let Ron Wilson go. It's not that he's a bad GM, but his expiry date with the Sharks has passed. If that move gets made first, then a lot of other moves will follow....moves that Ron Wilson won't currently make. As long as Wilson is still in charge no profound improvements can happen. The problem is at the top.

If this is repeating others from past posts I apologize....I don't follow this site nearly as much as others to know what others are saying.


Ron Wilson was a good coach for us in the Lombardi days but he is long retired I am pretty sure. But yea, I'm trying to keep this post on track and not another "sharks suck, rebuild" comment section. Thanks though.
24 sept. 2021 à 13 h 2
#6
total_knut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 255
Mentions "j'aime": 106
My fault...I meant Doug Wilson. lol No idea how I pulled up Ron Wilson.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage