SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

They need this rebuild

Créé par: Connor_McJesus_97
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 25 août 2021
Publié: 25 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2750 000 $
21 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 250 000 $
21 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Khudobin, Anton
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Burns, Brent (4 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
I think that with 50% retained there might be some interest. I won't expect a big return. I think a 3rd is fine.
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
Détails additionnels:
Another team comes in a retains a little over a 1m and Tampa pays them with a 4th
TBL
  1. Khudobin, Anton (1 333 333 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
You flip him for a pick
3.
SJS
  1. Boqvist, Jesper [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
here he can get a bigger role in the top 6
NJD
  1. Meier, Timo
Détails additionnels:
Meier will come with an extension. Im thinking 6-7m on a 6-8 year deal.
4.
SJS
  1. Myers, Tyler
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
They are looking good if they can get him off their books
VAN
    future considerations
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2024
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2181 500 000 $68 485 833 $0 $382 500 $13 014 167 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    894 167 $894 167 $
    AG
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    25 août 2021 à 6 h 58
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 405
    Mentions "j'aime": 221
    Meier has a $10m QO, while he can take a long term deal, he's still in the driver seat for that next deal and may be tougher to extend without an overpayment to avoid him hitting UFA.
    Devil et vikhodush a aimé ceci.
    25 août 2021 à 8 h 50
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 6,694
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
    Problem with Burns is he’s still got a lot of term left on his contract. Agree that max retention will help but I still think teams will be extremely weary of trading for him and it’s more of a cap dump situation.

    Meier’s QO situation makes trading for him more complicated. Likely the return won’t be as big as it should be for a player of his caliber and potential bc of the future contract situation from him. Unless he comes out and says he’ll sign something below that and agrees as part of the deal.

    I think Myers takes a lot more to dump than a 2nd. That contract is awful for what he is.
    25 août 2021 à 9 h 7
    #3
    Bedard23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 9,314
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,488
    Quoting: vikhodush
    Problem with Burns is he’s still got a lot of term left on his contract. Agree that max retention will help but I still think teams will be extremely weary of trading for him and it’s more of a cap dump situation.

    Meier’s QO situation makes trading for him more complicated. Likely the return won’t be as big as it should be for a player of his caliber and potential bc of the future contract situation from him. Unless he comes out and says he’ll sign something below that and agrees as part of the deal.

    I think Myers takes a lot more to dump than a 2nd. That contract is awful for what he is.


    And I think the stars are full on defensemen
    25 août 2021 à 10 h 40
    #4
    True Reverse Retro
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 4,634
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,045
    Dallas is not interested in Burns. His age & term remaining on his contract make him someone Dallas should avoid like the plague. Dallas already gave a 4-year deal to a 36-year old Suter (stupid move, IMO). Add to that guys like Radulov, Benn, Pavelski, and even Seguin & Dallas is one of the older teams in the league. Their focus should 100% be getting younger after this season.

    Both Pavelski and Radulov are gone after the year, and I would utilize their roster spot & cap savings to call up our NHL ready prospects and/or go after guys like Burakovsky in free agency.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage