SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Eklund Plays From Day 1

Créé par: Burnzie8_88_4Cup
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 19 août 2021
Publié: 19 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Timo, Balcers and Dahlen could switch Lines, based on chemistry and results. I could see Timo on L1 RW because he's bigger then Balcers and Hertl can bang on L2. As of now, I like these Lines to start.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 076 667 $0 $1 275 000 $15 423 333 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 août 2021 à 12 h 59
#1
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,700
Mentions "j'aime": 1,890
If he stays in San Jose for the season, I could see him getting some games in the NHL, but most of the time he'd be in the AHL.
lilfimpen et icehawk2006 a aimé ceci.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 3
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,781
Mentions "j'aime": 529
Quoting: Klara
If he stays in San Jose for the season, I could see him getting some games in the NHL, but most of the time he'd be in the AHL.




Wishful thinking on my part, I just feel if he's here, that he'll be good enough for the Sharks, kinda like Marleau in his rookie year.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 6
#3
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 926
Mentions "j'aime": 519
I'd switch Balcers and Labanc. Balcers was good but Labanc has more finish and passing ability than Balcers.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 9
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,781
Mentions "j'aime": 529
Quoting: lilfimpen
I'd switch Balcers and Labanc. Balcers was good but Labanc has more finish and passing ability than Balcers.




I put Balcers there because he seems to mesh with Cooch and he's a better defender then Bancer.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 13
#5
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 926
Mentions "j'aime": 519
Quoting: NjAHeRtL48
I put Balcers there because he seems to mesh with Cooch and he's a better defender then Bancer.


Yes and a better defender should be on the 3rd line taking defensive zone draws while Labanc is top six taking offensive zone draws. See my point.
Burnzie8_88_4Cup a aimé ceci.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 14
#6
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 926
Mentions "j'aime": 519
Quoting: Klara
If he stays in San Jose for the season, I could see him getting some games in the NHL, but most of the time he'd be in the AHL.


I think he should get some NHL games. But in all honesty I am more keen to see Dahlen get more top six minutes than Eklund. Dahlen is wayyy more ready.
Klara a aimé ceci.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 22
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,781
Mentions "j'aime": 529
Quoting: lilfimpen
I think he should get some NHL games. But in all honesty I am more keen to see Dahlen get more top six minutes than Eklund. Dahlen is wayyy more ready.




I wonder why they didn't bring Dahlen to Dev. Camp?
19 août 2021 à 13 h 24
#8
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,700
Mentions "j'aime": 1,890
Quoting: NjAHeRtL48
I wonder why they didn't bring Dahlen to Dev. Camp?


23 year old on one-way contract with significant pro experience.
bunnymcfoo a aimé ceci.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 25
#9
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 926
Mentions "j'aime": 519
Quoting: NjAHeRtL48
I wonder why they didn't bring Dahlen to Dev. Camp?


Dahlen is a lock to make the team basically. He's been developing for years in pro leagues. If he doesn't play well the Sharks can send him down but he'll have to pass thru waivers where he will undoubtedly be claimed.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 28
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: NjAHeRtL48
I put Balcers there because he seems to mesh with Cooch and he's a better defender then Bancer.


Balcers isnt better defensively and you're placing him on his off side. Labanc clearly meshed better than Balcers.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 30
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,781
Mentions "j'aime": 529
Quoting: Klara
23 year old on one-way contract with significant pro experience.


Quoting: lilfimpen
Dahlen is a lock to make the team basically. He's been developing for years in pro leagues. If he doesn't play well the Sharks can send him down but he'll have to pass thru waivers where he will undoubtedly be claimed.





I knew he played overseas, but not with SJ, it just would be cool to see him.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 30
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: NjAHeRtL48
Wishful thinking on my part, I just feel if he's here, that he'll be good enough for the Sharks, kinda like Marleau in his rookie year.


Marleau was a clear franchise type player and clear all star to be. Eklund is really good, but isnt a lock like Marleau.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 31
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: NjAHeRtL48
I knew he played overseas, but not with SJ, it just would be cool to see him.


Dev Camp really isnt for players the Sharks know well. Dev Camp is for Sharks brass to see guys that are likely to not make the team, and send them home with homework. He'll be at Sharks camp.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 32
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
It's too late to buyout Kane this year.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 33
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,781
Mentions "j'aime": 529
Quoting: icehawk2006
Dev Camp really isnt for players the Sharks know well. Dev Camp is for Sharks brass to see guys that are likely to not make the team, and send them home with homework. He'll be at Sharks camp.




OK. I'm also interested in seeing Ozzy.
icehawk2006 a aimé ceci.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 35
#16
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 926
Mentions "j'aime": 519
Quoting: icehawk2006
It's too late to buyout Kane this year.


If he is in fact guilty his contract will likely be terminated. If not, they'll be big boys and reconcile and Evander can score 30 again oh well.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 37
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: NjAHeRtL48
OK. I'm also interested in seeing Ozzy.


Me too. Scrimmage tonight at 7 PDT will be fun. If you havent registered, go to the Sharks website or twitter.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 40
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: lilfimpen
If he is in fact guilty his contract will likely be terminated. If not, they'll be big boys and reconcile and Evander can score 30 again oh well.


that's true, but nja has kane bought out. That cant happen. As for reconciling, I doubt it. There is only so much BS people can deal with and he's toxic in general. If he stays, the Sharks will be worse. Especially since what the team really needs is accountability and there is no way that complete fool of a head coach will do that.
Klara a aimé ceci.
19 août 2021 à 13 h 43
#19
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 926
Mentions "j'aime": 519
Quoting: icehawk2006
that's true, but nja has kane bought out. That cant happen. As for reconciling, I doubt it. There is only so much BS people can deal with and he's toxic in general. If he stays, the Sharks will be worse. Especially since what the team really needs is accountability and there is no way that complete fool of a head coach will do that.


yeah. Boogie, I wish ye had more balls.
icehawk2006 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage