SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Scenario #2: Trade Deadline

Créé par: Blynasty
Équipe: 2016-17 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 27 janv. 2017
Publié: 27 janv. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just some food for thought. Is the value there?
Transactions
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2018
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2019
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2273 000 000 $70 835 308 $0 $540 000 $2 164 692 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
667 500 $667 500 $ (Bonis de performance257 500 $$258K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 9
640 000 $640 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, C
NTC
UFA - 3
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
625 000 $625 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
625 000 $625 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 6
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 6
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
630 833 $630 833 $ (Bonis de performance282 500 $$282K)
G
UFA - 2
3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
575 000 $575 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 janv. 2017 à 10 h 27
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 1
wtf
27 janv. 2017 à 10 h 35
#2
Pens
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,475
Mentions "j'aime": 234
This deal is terrible for the pens.
27 janv. 2017 à 10 h 43
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,138
Mentions "j'aime": 106
Quoting: Sqm918
This deal is terrible for the pens.


A 30 year old Schnieder fits in perfectly with the Crosby, Malkin, Letang, and Kessel core age. It's widely accepted that he is one of the best goalies in the league. I understand Murray has a lot of upside, but there is always that chance that a young goalie starts out great and fizzles out. Fleury, Kunitz, and Pouliot are all moveable at this point, and Cammalleri is a very Malkin type winger.
27 janv. 2017 à 10 h 59
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 83
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Woof. Lots of things wrong with this. Not only is this a rough deal for the Pens, it makes no sense for the Devils. Why would they give away their good goaltending situation to inherit our terrible one? I can't stomach that Cammalleri contract either. He's super streaky and at $5M until 2019 means we aren't going to be able to resign most of Sheary, Rust, Kuhnhackl, Wilson, Schultz, or Dumoulin. On top of all of that, Pittsburgh would still have to acquire another goalie who is eligible to expose for the expansion draft.
27 janv. 2017 à 11 h 56
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,138
Mentions "j'aime": 106
Quoting: GetDeadKid
Why would they give away their good goaltending situation to inherit our terrible one?.


Terrible goaltending situation that led to a cup last year... We are in a sticky situation due to the expansions draft. Our goaltending is an asset that most of the league would be envious of had the issue of expansion not come up. Don't let this site brainwash into thinking there isn't value there just because you see a lot of people trying to move the same players.
27 janv. 2017 à 15 h 9
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 83
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: Blynasty
Quoting: GetDeadKid
Why would they give away their good goaltending situation to inherit our terrible one?.


Terrible goaltending situation that led to a cup last year... We are in a sticky situation due to the expansions draft. Our goaltending is an asset that most of the league would be envious of had the issue of expansion not come up. Don't let this site brainwash into thinking there isn't value there just because you see a lot of people trying to move the same players.


I'm not deluded enough to think that NJ has interest in giving up Schneider for Fleury and Cammalleri for an older UFA winger and an 8th overall pick who can't crack a top 7 or 8 Penguins defense. You might as well just trade them Fleury because they can't protect both and 100% chance that one of the two left exposed is taken by Vegas.

On top of that, inheriting that goaltending situation does them no good. NJ isn't making a Cup run this year even if they manage to make the playoffs.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage