SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is this enough

Créé par: CanucksPain
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 18 mai 2021
Publié: 18 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I know Vancouver fans are gonna **** at me but hear me out, rienheart is similar to boeser, so I took Boesers value decreed it a little because Boeser>Rienheart and Rienheart wants a trade. That’s how I got the value. I also needed to add a Jim benning moment so I added the 2nd.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3900 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
77 000 000 $
37 700 000 $
1950 000 $
36 900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1975 000 $
12 250 000 $
33 150 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
BUF
  1. Bowey, Madison
  2. Gadjovich, Jonah
  3. Holtby, Braden
  4. Lind, Kole [Droits de RFA]
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Pick 6or7
If Linus Ullmark test FA it’s not a bad move to get Holtby
Gadj and Lind has huge upside
2.
VAN
    Would have taken Lind or gadjovich but they get traded
    Rachats de contrats
    Frais appliqués
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de VAN
    2022
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2023
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $80 437 326 $648 780 $1 082 500 $1 062 674 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 700 000 $7 700 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    AG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    975 000 $975 000 $
    C
    UFA
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    825 000 $825 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 900 000 $6 900 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    950 000 $950 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    842 500 $842 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (1 875 000 $$2M1 875 000 $$2M)
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $ (4 875 000 $$5M4 875 000 $$5M)
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    786 111 $786 111 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    RFA - 3

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    18 mai 2021 à 1 h 16
    #1
    Canucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 583
    Mentions "j'aime": 254
    yes
    18 mai 2021 à 2 h 11
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 4,076
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,939
    I'm a sabre fan, if we trade Eichel, I would take this. Only thing, the way Reinhart played this year, idk if boeser is better than him, it's close.

    Before this season, I would have took boeser over Reinhart all day
    18 mai 2021 à 2 h 35
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 4,986
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
    That seems a big bridge for Hughes. Is that the common sentiment amongst the VAN faithful?
    18 mai 2021 à 3 h 24
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 10,412
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,014
    Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
    That seems a big bridge for Hughes. Is that the common sentiment amongst the VAN faithful?


    Apparently the sense is that he is going longer now... 5+ yrs. Originally I was on team Bridge. He's had a pretty gnarly year, far worse this year than last year, especially defensively. If He does bridge, I wouldn't want it over 6m x 3.


    --

    I'd do the Reinhart deal if the 2nd round pick was decreased. You're sending cap back - that's essential, but no negative value contracts. Equivalently if Holtby and Loui swapped places in the trades, it's good by me.

    I do like Sam's fit here. I think he could even turn out better than Brock in a vacuum.
    remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    18 mai 2021 à 3 h 44
    #5
    thewookie1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 2,467
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,037
    Who is Bowey and why would we want him lol
    18 mai 2021 à 8 h 49
    #6
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,432
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,114
    you have to pay for Buffalo to take Holtby, Id rather give Houser a shot than Holtby
    18 mai 2021 à 16 h 53
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 10,412
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,014
    Quoting: Shibbal18
    you have to pay for Buffalo to take Holtby, Id rather give Houser a shot than Holtby


    He's not negative value. Stats are deflated from a rough start. Has been competent since then. If Ullmark walks, there's no reason to turn him down.
    CanucksPain a aimé ceci.
    18 mai 2021 à 17 h 4
    #8
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,432
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,114
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    He's not negative value. Stats are deflated from a rough start. Has been competent since then. If Ullmark walks, there's no reason to turn him down.


    He is definitely negative value. Hes had plenty of rough starts in his career only to be bailed out by a cup caliber Capitals roster. Like I said Id rather start the year with Houser
    18 mai 2021 à 17 h 20
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 10,412
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,014
    Quoting: Shibbal18
    He is definitely negative value. Hes had plenty of rough starts in his career only to be bailed out by a cup caliber Capitals roster. Like I said Id rather start the year with Houser


    /shrug - just fan opinion. I guarantee all 31 other GMs are not demanding a ransom along side him. Devan Dubnyk got a 5th twice last year. Holtby has more to his game both currently and in his record. If we have to retain to make it work, so be it. But he's not negative value.

    I respect the majority of your takes, but this is more of an "I don't want him" than "The team won't take him"
    CanucksPain a aimé ceci.
    18 mai 2021 à 19 h 17
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    GREEN FIRED
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 680
    Mentions "j'aime": 236
    Quoting: thewookie1
    Who is Bowey and why would we want him lol


    He’s just an add on but he’s a defence with some untouched potential. Since we didn’t have a good d prospect to sent I have a 2nd
    18 mai 2021 à 19 h 25
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    GREEN FIRED
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 680
    Mentions "j'aime": 236
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    Apparently the sense is that he is going longer now... 5+ yrs. Originally I was on team Bridge. He's had a pretty gnarly year, far worse this year than last year, especially defensively. If He does bridge, I wouldn't want it over 6m x 3.


    --

    I'd do the Reinhart deal if the 2nd round pick was decreased. You're sending cap back - that's essential, but no negative value contracts. Equivalently if Holtby and Loui swapped places in the trades, it's good by me.

    I do like Sam's fit here. I think he could even turn out better than Brock in a vacuum.


    Ok the Hughes contract might be much but it’s nice wink

    I need to add the 2nd because buffalo wants a decent D prospect Vancouver doesn’t have any they would wanna give so we add the 2nd to give more value, otherwise they can get a better return from another team.

    I also like the fit as it seems JT might leave when his contracts up rienheart can easily replace him
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage