SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Worst BUT Most Likely Offseason Outcome

Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 23 sept. 2020
Publié: 2 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The gist: They won't actually commit to any significant changes & they spend assets to acquire goaltending. They then overpay to bring Brodie back (bringing him back at all is a huge mistake unless its at a massive discount ie. 3 years max at $4 mill or less which isn't fair to him tbh)

SO Despite all the bluster about "shaking up the core" they won't out of a combined mindset of overvaluing their players, a misguided fear of "losing" the trade in conjunction and their even more ridiculous perception they are in a window to win now. Hence another year wasted being mediocre. Sadly this will lead to fans ultimately turning on (insert whipping boy du Joire) because they refused to trade Gio/Monahan/Gaudreau until it was way too late (ala Iginla.)

Swap out the "depth" signings with whatever "physical, big bodied, character" veteran players on league minimum deals you see fit and it always equates to a cap team struggling to make playoffs / out of the first round again.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
1800 000 $
2795 000 $
32 850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
1750 000 $
1700 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
55 000 000 $
1700 000 $
Transactions
ARI
  1. Kylington, Oliver
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $71 328 332 $0 $522 500 $10 171 668 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
801 666 $801 666 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 oct. 2020 à 18 h 24
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
This is the sad but accurate truth. Great to stabilize the crease, but it really wasn't a glaring issue last year. Not enough top end grit, a ton of talent, but a very easy team to play against when the top 6 is out there, other than Tkachuk.
I agree with Brodie being a huge mistake, I see Brian Campbell in the sense that those smooth skating d men are great, until they're not and then they're really bad, rather bring back Gutafsson at 3 - 3.5
I still don't like Bennett as a 3C, start him at 4C and see if he can tighten up defensively, he was great at beating up a depleted Winnipeg team but the quick D of Dallas exposed him. I think if you can get another 3C like Haula then you can play Bennett and Ryan on the same line and get Bennett's defensive game to improve. Don't know where that money comes from though.
2 oct. 2020 à 18 h 27
#2
Flames fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 137
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Doesn't sound like Arizona is going to trade Kuemper now. Meanwhile, TSN radio had Markstrom not interested in Edmonton or Detroit, but interested in Vancouver, Calgary, Colorado, and Toronto. I think we'll see more change than this in Calgary. Also, 3 years walks Mangiapane straight to free agency - I imagine they'll do a 2 year deal, and then get back to the table one more time.
2 oct. 2020 à 18 h 49
#3
Flames fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 137
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
This is the sad but accurate truth. Great to stabilize the crease, but it really wasn't a glaring issue last year. Not enough top end grit, a ton of talent, but a very easy team to play against when the top 6 is out there, other than Tkachuk.
I agree with Brodie being a huge mistake, I see Brian Campbell in the sense that those smooth skating d men are great, until they're not and then they're really bad, rather bring back Gutafsson at 3 - 3.5
I still don't like Bennett as a 3C, start him at 4C and see if he can tighten up defensively, he was great at beating up a depleted Winnipeg team but the quick D of Dallas exposed him. I think if you can get another 3C like Haula then you can play Bennett and Ryan on the same line and get Bennett's defensive game to improve. Don't know where that money comes from though.


Bennett has earned the 3C spot. Not only has he earned it, but it's also about putting players in a position to succeed - and the 3C is that spot for Benny. Especially as the Flames do introduce more grit into their line-up - they need more minutes for Bennett. Lucic - Bennett - Dube should start together.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage