SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Jones Buyout Burns not moved

Créé par: Klara
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 14 août 2020
Publié: 15 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
32 500 000 $
1900 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 400 000 $
1800 000 $
1900 000 $
1700 000 $
21 500 000 $
43 000 000 $
21 800 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. McCann, Jared [Droits de RFA]
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
not sure what PIT is valuing McCann at, would be willing to pay more.
2.
SJS
    Anywhere
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de COL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de WSH
    2021
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $73 849 999 $0 $597 500 $7 650 001 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 7
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    700 000 $700 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    700 000 $700 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    15 août 2020 à 14 h 15
    #1
    Am Yisrael Chai
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2018
    Messages: 18,732
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,798
    Think you did good here. McCann would cost more imo. Probably Gambrell and a 2nd could entice Pittsburgh to move him since they are loaded with bottom 6 depth.

    I recommend keeping Sorenson over Vesey too. He's dead weight.
    Klara a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2020 à 14 h 18
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Bad Take Bot v1.02
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 2,698
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,889
    Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
    Think you did good here. McCann would cost more imo. Probably Gambrell and a 2nd could entice Pittsburgh to move him since they are loaded with bottom 6 depth.

    I recommend keeping Sorenson over Vesey too. He's dead weight.


    I would do McCann for the COL 2nd, would need to consider also adding Gambrell.

    Eh, Sorenson is questionable to even make the team, Vesey is a risk, could end up being dead weight, or maybe a good 3rd line scorer.
    15 août 2020 à 14 h 20
    #3
    Am Yisrael Chai
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2018
    Messages: 18,732
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,798
    Quoting: Klara
    I would do McCann for the COL 2nd, would need to consider also adding Gambrell.

    Eh, Sorenson is questionable to even make the team, Vesey is a risk, could end up being dead weight, or maybe a good 3rd line scorer.


    I remember Sorenson being formidable? well at least a year or two ago. But other than that fixing the G is the key which Talbot should do.
    15 août 2020 à 14 h 23
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,280
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
    Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
    I remember Sorenson being formidable? well at least a year or two ago. But other than that fixing the G is the key which Talbot should do.


    He’s still good. He sucked for the first 50 games of the season, then began playing a bit better.
    15 août 2020 à 14 h 24
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Bad Take Bot v1.02
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 2,698
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,889
    Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
    I remember Sorenson being formidable? well at least a year or two ago. But other than that fixing the G is the key which Talbot should do.


    Sorenson had a really good playoffs in 17-18, and followed up with good production in 18-19, but since then has looked horrid.
    15 août 2020 à 14 h 27
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,280
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
    Yeah McCann is guess would cost slightly more. I think the COL 2nd replacing that 3rd would do it. I also think he might be getting more $ but I wouldn’t know what he’s worth exactly. And even though he’s a great 3C option and it helps our depth, I can’t help but want to give him 2nd line minutes. Seems like he’d be better utilized at 2C or 2LW, but that’s just me.
    Klara a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2020 à 14 h 28
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Bad Take Bot v1.02
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 2,698
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,889
    Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
    Yeah McCann is guess would cost slightly more. I think the COL 2nd replacing that 3rd would do it. I also think he might be getting more $ but I wouldn’t know what he’s worth exactly. And even though he’s a great 3C option and it helps our depth, I can’t help but want to give him 2nd line minutes. Seems like he’d be better utilized at 2C or 2LW, but that’s just me.


    I'd rather have a quality 3C and a meh 2W than a bad 3C and a good 2W.
    FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2020 à 14 h 35
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,280
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
    Quoting: Klara
    I'd rather have a quality 3C and a meh 2W than a bad 3C and a good 2W.


    Fair enough.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage