SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames

Créé par: Carter_chevy
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 8 août 2020
Publié: 12 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Treleving Please dont sign bad free agents/trade draft picks
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
44 500 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
34 000 000 $
1850 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $72 779 166 $0 $882 500 $8 720 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
733 333 $733 333 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
950 000 $950 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 août 2020 à 14 h 30
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
That Mangiapane signing is absolute insanity.
12 août 2020 à 14 h 32
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 347
Mentions "j'aime": 84
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
That Mangiapane signing is absolute insanity.


the term or the amount? I tried to compare it to Lindholms contract
12 août 2020 à 14 h 38
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Carter_chevy
the term or the amount? I tried to compare it to Lindholms contract


He is a quarter the player Lindholm is, in terms of scoring, defense, PK, PP etc. and only one year younger. I know people are excited about Mangiapane but don't be surprised if Treliving let's him sit out at the start of training camp for a better deal. He's good but frankly 45 points in 122 games with 70% of those coming in year two doesn't justify a long term or big money contract. One year prove it deal at 950K - 1.25M.
Carter_chevy a aimé ceci.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 11
#4
CFGM Game Moderator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,698
Mentions "j'aime": 1,518
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
One year prove it deal at 950K - 1.25M.


What do you think THIS season was?
He took his current contract as a "prove it" deal and he proved it.
Look at some of his advanced stats, they're top 5 on the entire team in some areas.

I don't see him getting the 4.5 like this shows, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him get somewhere in the $3m range.
Let's face it, Bennett got 2.55M coming off a far worse season than Mangiapane had.
As for term, Treliving seems to be a big fan of getting guys locked into 6yr deals, so ya just never know
Carter_chevy a aimé ceci.
12 août 2020 à 18 h 13
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: flamesfan419
What do you think THIS season was?
He took his current contract as a "prove it" deal and he proved it.
Look at some of his advanced stats, they're top 5 on the entire team in some areas.

I don't see him getting the 4.5 like this shows, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him get somewhere in the $3m range.
Let's face it, Bennett got 2.55M coming off a far worse season than Mangiapane had.
As for term, Treliving seems to be a big fan of getting guys locked into 6yr deals, so ya just never know


I don't think this year proved Mangiapane at all. I think it's a great start and he's established himself as a bonafide NHL player and certainly earned a pay raise but one season with 32 points is how you end up with Lance Bouma's contract, 15 points one year, 34 the next and then 7 the next two. Mangiapane, 13 points one year, 32 the next, then what?

If you want to compare Sam Bennett and his first contract coming off an ELC as opposed to Mangiapane and a prove it deal this year, Bennett signed his deal coming off the 2016-17 season, 2 years 1.95 per. His points per game was 0.38 where Mangipanes over his last two seasons is 0.26, Bennett's two prior seasons he scored 36 and 26 points respectively in addition to 4 points in 11 games in the playoffs where 18 year old Sam Bennett was born. That earned him 1.95/year with the pedigree of being the 4th overall pick. Mangipane's stats aren't as good as Bennett's were coming off small contracts and Mangiapane has only done it once. One year at 32 points is not a prove it season, that's showing that he is worth a spot in the starting twelve day in and day out, if he came in and put up 5 points he would be going the way of Jankowski, but he proved that he deserves a roster spot, now next season prove that your worth a big contract. He has arb rights and I think they will be used, like last year his agent will ask for way too much.
Carter_chevy et flamesfan419 a aimé ceci.
12 août 2020 à 18 h 19
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 347
Mentions "j'aime": 84
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
I don't think this year proved Mangiapane at all. I think it's a great start and he's established himself as a bonafide NHL player and certainly earned a pay raise but one season with 32 points is how you end up with Lance Bouma's contract, 15 points one year, 34 the next and then 7 the next two. Mangiapane, 13 points one year, 32 the next, then what?

If you want to compare Sam Bennett and his first contract coming off an ELC as opposed to Mangiapane and a prove it deal this year, Bennett signed his deal coming off the 2016-17 season, 2 years 1.95 per. His points per game was 0.38 where Mangipanes over his last two seasons is 0.26, Bennett's two prior seasons he scored 36 and 26 points respectively in addition to 4 points in 11 games in the playoffs where 18 year old Sam Bennett was born. That earned him 1.95/year with the pedigree of being the 4th overall pick. Mangipane's stats aren't as good as Bennett's were coming off small contracts and Mangiapane has only done it once. One year at 32 points is not a prove it season, that's showing that he is worth a spot in the starting twelve day in and day out, if he came in and put up 5 points he would be going the way of Jankowski, but he proved that he deserves a roster spot, now next season prove that your worth a big contract. He has arb rights and I think they will be used, like last year his agent will ask for way too much.


Very good analysis
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage