SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rangers Bruins Trade

Créé par: mcivitella
Équipe: 2016-17 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 9 juill. 2016
Publié: 9 juill. 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 500 000 $
2800 000 $
54 800 000 $
2600 000 $
Transactions
NYR
  1. Chara, Zdeno (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. DeBrusk, Jake
  3. Krejci, David (2 000 000 $ retained)
  4. Senyshyn, Zach
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (EDM)
BOS
  1. Holden, Nick
  2. Klein, Kevin
  3. Nash, Rick
Détails additionnels:
rights to chris kreider
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de NYR
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYR
Logo de FLA
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
2018
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2019
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2273 000 000 $64 666 667 $0 $0 $8 333 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
600 000 $600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 3
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
600 000 $600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
4 700 000 $4 700 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
600 000 $600 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 juill. 2016 à 12 h 40
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 338
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Up there with some of the worst trades I've seen on here lmao. No way in hell conference rivals make trades like this.
9 juill. 2016 à 13 h 20
#2
Démarrer sujet
Mactad
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 111
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Nick628
Up there with some of the worst trades I've seen on here lmao. No way in hell conference rivals make trades like this.


Anyone can criticize without explaining. Let me try and break it down for you.
With the window to win a cup closing fast for the Rangers they make this deal because:
Chara provides the necessary leadership required to win and they believe he has one good year left in him.
While Krejci isnt Kreider he also has the leadership and cup experience to push the guys around him and proves to be a better asset than Nash. At the end of the day if it doesnt work they at least received a pick and decent prospects.

Boston had to give up two of their prospects to get Kreider. The contracts of Chara and Krejci, while not off setting Nash still retain money for acquiring two NHL defensemen, which they desperately need. They sell the big body and goal scoring ability of Nash to LA to get disgruntled Dustin Brown who plays like a man with something to prove, along with the stability of the underrated Klein and the steady Holden and hope it can push the B's back into the playoffs.
9 juill. 2016 à 14 h 42
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 17
Mentions "j'aime": 2
But this trade makes the Rangers significantly slower and the back end even worse. Your reasoning is sound, but this deal pretty much kills any hope of making the playoffs from a Rangers perspective. It also forces the Rangers to protect 4 D during the expansion draft, practically guaranteeing they lose young forwards, pushing any rebuild further back.
9 juill. 2016 à 14 h 53
#4
John
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 404
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Goneaway90
But this trade makes the Rangers significantly slower and the back end even worse. Your reasoning is sound, but this deal pretty much kills any hope of making the playoffs from a Rangers perspective. It also forces the Rangers to protect 4 D during the expansion draft, practically guaranteeing they lose young forwards, pushing any rebuild further back.


Agreed very bad trade
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage