SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Joey Alvis

Créé par: JosephAlvis
Équipe: 2016-17 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 7 juill. 2016
Publié: 7 juill. 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
84 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TBL
  1. Jágr, Jaromír
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (FLA)
2.
TBL
  1. Benn, Jamie
  2. Dowling, Justin
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (DAL)
3.
4.
TBL
  1. Murray, Matt
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de TBL
Logo de PIT
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de DAL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
2018
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
2019
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2073 000 000 $65 261 667 $314 168 $4 672 500 $7 738 333 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 300 000 $$2M)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 8
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 1
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 515 000 $$2M)
AD
UFA - 1
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
625 000 $625 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
G
UFA - 1
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
628 333 $628 333 $ (Bonis de performance257 500 $$258K)
G
UFA - 1
575 000 $575 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 juill. 2016 à 22 h 51
#1
I'm Savage okay?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 30
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Some interesting moves u have going on here.

However, i cannot see how the Stars would EVER be willing to part with their #1 player for Bishop. They need a #1 goalie... But NOT at the expense of their franchise player, & the 3rd pick/downey make it all the more unrealistic and a rub in the face... Not in this world my friend.

I like the idea of the Jagr trade. Personally i feel u might be giving up to much for him and a 2nd. But its definitely feasible and could happen. However my personal critique is that by getting Jagr ur looking to add depth, not a 1st line forward. I find it hard to accept that Drouin would be ok with playing on the 3rd line too--this could be a problem. Thus, switch Drouin with Jagr. This would add depth, allow Drouin to be happy and a better development (this kid has SERIOUS potential) and a more effective 1st line.

And if u think the Pens are willing to part with Murray and a 1st for what ur offering keep dreaming.

Lastly... Please, for the love of god, take Kucherov of the 3rd line. This guy was ur leading scorer during the playoffs. He belongs with Palat and Johnston. Nuffsaid. Then put Callahan on the 4th line and bring Galagher to the 3rd.

In all honesty, these trades look like a 8yr took over Be a GM mode, in NHL 16, on Rookie, and went gung-ho. More realism man. But it was an interesting read, gave me a laugh thats for sure. Thanks for sharing and all the best!
JosephAlvis a aimé ceci.
8 juill. 2016 à 13 h 2
#2
Démarrer sujet
JoeyAlvis
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 31
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Thank you for the feedback. I actually wasn't sure how all this worked as far as trades being feasible. For the record, I see why it looks like an eight year old on GM mode, I wasn't sure if the system would reject trades or not and so I shot for the moon. Now I understand the system better and will be far more realistic. You have a good mind for the game and I completely agree with your critiques. Watch what I build now.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage