SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boston Bruins® 2016-17

Créé par: Crowther37
Équipe: 2016-17 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 10 juin 2016
Publié: 10 juin 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Bringing Stanley Cup fever back to Boston.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
31 000 000 $
2900 000 $
2750 000 $
43 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
66 000 000 $
66 000 000 $
Vesey, Jimmy
3925 000 $
32 500 000 $
33 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
STL
  1. Krejci, David
Détails additionnels:
2016 1st round pick
2.
BOS
    2016 1st round pick
    3.
    BOS
      2018 3rd round pick
      4.
      BOS
        2017 4th round pick
        Rachats de contrats
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2473 000 000 $64 642 084 $0 $505 000 $8 357 916 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
        AG
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
        C
        NMC
        UFA - 6
        6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
        AD
        UFA - 7
        Vesey, Jimmy
        925 000 $925 000 $
        950 000 $950 000 $
        C, AG
        UFA - 1
        925 000 $925 000 $
        AD
        UFA - 1
        1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
        AG
        M-NTC
        UFA - 4
        3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
        C, AG, AD
        UFA - 5
        3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
        C, AD
        UFA - 6
        792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
        AG, AD
        UFA - 2
        817 500 $817 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
        C, AD
        UFA - 1
        872 500 $872 500 $ (Bonis de performance157 500 $$158K)
        AG, AD
        UFA - 3
        750 000 $750 000 $
        C, AD
        UFA - 1
        800 000 $800 000 $
        AD
        UFA - 1
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 7
        2 592 500 $2 592 500 $
        DD
        UFA - 1
        2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
        G
        UFA - 1
        6 916 667 $6 916 667 $
        DG
        NMC
        UFA - 2
        1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 2
        2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
        G
        UFA - 1
        5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 4
        2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 4
        900 000 $900 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 1
        858 750 $858 750 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
        DG
        UFA - 2

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
        10 juin 2016 à 13 h 53
        #1
        BreKel
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2016
        Messages: 3,537
        Mentions "j'aime": 460
        I'll just say that your first pairing would get eaten alive in the playoffs.
        10 juin 2016 à 16 h 12
        #2
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: nov. 2015
        Messages: 1,565
        Mentions "j'aime": 89
        Really can't see Boston being a contender again for quite some time too many old players that were stars five years ago, only strength of the Bruins is their 1-2 punch of Krejci and Bergeron
        10 juin 2016 à 17 h 21
        #3
        BreKel
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2016
        Messages: 3,537
        Mentions "j'aime": 460
        Quoting: LeafsFan
        Really can't see Boston being a contender again for quite some time too many old players that were stars five years ago, only strength of the Bruins is their 1-2 punch of Krejci and Bergeron


        I don't think a leafs fan should be commenting on anything like this.
        10 juin 2016 à 19 h 29
        #4
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2016
        Messages: 177
        Mentions "j'aime": 3
        Quoting: BreKel
        Quoting: LeafsFan
        Really can't see Boston being a contender again for quite some time too many old players that were stars five years ago, only strength of the Bruins is their 1-2 punch of Krejci and Bergeron


        I don't think a leafs fan should be commenting on anything like this.
        This is so true. The Leafs have been one of the worst if not the worst franchises the last 10 years.
        11 juin 2016 à 10 h 44
        #5
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2016
        Messages: 2
        Mentions "j'aime": 0
        Quoting: BreKel
        I'll just say that your first pairing would get eaten alive in the playoffs.

        You think the Yandle-Shattenkirk pair would get "eaten alive"? You are so wrong that's a solid pair of ive seen one.
        11 juin 2016 à 10 h 50
        #6
        BreKel
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2016
        Messages: 3,537
        Mentions "j'aime": 460
        Quoting: Crowther37
        Quoting: BreKel
        I'll just say that your first pairing would get eaten alive in the playoffs.

        You think the Yandle-Shattenkirk pair would get "eaten alive"? You are so wrong that's a solid pair of ive seen one.


        Yes, they are both miserable in their own zone. So they would get eaten alive in the playoffs. They are good defenseman, but they need partners who can compliment their games. They do not compliment each other at all.
        11 juin 2016 à 11 h 25
        #7
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2016
        Messages: 2
        Mentions "j'aime": 0
        Quoting: BreKel
        Quoting: Crowther37
        Quoting: BreKel
        I'll just say that your first pairing would get eaten alive in the playoffs.

        You think the Yandle-Shattenkirk pair would get "eaten alive"? You are so wrong that's a solid pair of ive seen one.


        Yes, they are both miserable in their own zone. So they would get eaten alive in the playoffs. They are good defenseman, but they need partners who can compliment their games. They do not compliment each other at all.

        That is true I'll give you that. How about Chara-Shattenkirk & Yandle-Either Miller
        11 juin 2016 à 11 h 59
        #8
        BreKel
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2016
        Messages: 3,537
        Mentions "j'aime": 460
        Quoting: Crowther37
        Quoting: BreKel
        Quoting: Crowther37
        Quoting: BreKel
        I'll just say that your first pairing would get eaten alive in the playoffs.

        You think the Yandle-Shattenkirk pair would get "eaten alive"? You are so wrong that's a solid pair of ive seen one.


        Yes, they are both miserable in their own zone. So they would get eaten alive in the playoffs. They are good defenseman, but they need partners who can compliment their games. They do not compliment each other at all.


        That is true I'll give you that. How about Chara-Shattenkirk & Yandle-Either Miller


        I wouldn't say either Miller. I don't think Colin would fit well with either, as well. He's in more of the offensive mold, and needs a lot of work on his defensive game. Kevan Miller is just brutal, and should not be anywhere near a top 4. If Kevan Miller is a top 4 defenseman on your team, you are not a good team. He is a #5/6 on a contender. If the Bruins actually had a legit 2nd pairing guy who was solid defensively, then I'd say that getting both Shattenkirk and Yandle would be a good move, but they don't. You target one of them (since they're very similar players) and acquire a more two-way guy.

        Chara -- Yandle/Shattenkirk
        Krug -- TRADE
        Colin -- Kevan

        But this is the Bruins, and sadly, I think they have sights on acquiring 1 guy, and using Kevan as the 2nd pairing guy. Something like this:

        Chara -- TRADE
        Krug -- Kevan
        Colin/Morrow -- McQuaid

        Bruins and Sweeney messed up resigning Kevan Miller, because they already have 2 other defenseman like him (struggle in the o-zone and transitioning the puck) in McQuaid and Seidenberg. To me, for the Miller signing to make any sense, that would mean Seidenberg AND McQuaid are both moved, Kevan slides into the #5/6 spot (however you want to look at it) and the Bruins acquire two legit top 4 defenseman. But I don't have much hope on that.
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage