SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruinssss

Créé par: flannel
Équipe: 2016-17 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 10 juin 2016
Publié: 10 juin 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
21 000 000 $
55 500 000 $
66 750 000 $
1750 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Vesey, Jimmy
2950 000 $
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Chara, Zdeno
  2. Marchand, Brad
Détails additionnels:
Retain 50% of Chara
2.
3.
BOS
    2016 4th round pick
    4.
    BOS
      2016 5th round pick
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2273 000 000 $60 352 917 $0 $530 000 $12 647 083 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      925 000 $925 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Vesey, Jimmy
      950 000 $950 000 $
      6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
      AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      AG, AD, C
      UFA - 1
      750 000 $750 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 1
      784 167 $784 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      850 000 $850 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      808 750 $808 750 $ (Bonis de performance232 500 $$232K)
      C, AG
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 6
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 3
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      G
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 4
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 4
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2
      925 000 $925 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      10 juin 2016 à 13 h 28
      #1
      Ross
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2016
      Messages: 310
      Mentions "j'aime": 9
      Putting way to much faith in Vesey and Vatrano to replace the offense that Marchand brought.
      10 juin 2016 à 14 h 7
      #2
      BreKel
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 3,537
      Mentions "j'aime": 460
      That Anaheim trade may be the worst I have seen in a long time. Clayton stoner? For your top scoring forward and a top 4 defense at 50% retained?
      10 juin 2016 à 14 h 26
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 177
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: BreKel
      That Anaheim trade may be the worst I have seen in a long time. Clayton stoner? For your top scoring forward and a top 4 defense at 50% retained?
      I think he meant to add in Lindholms rights.
      10 juin 2016 à 14 h 29
      #4
      BreKel
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 3,537
      Mentions "j'aime": 460
      Quoting: BruinsGuyFYI
      Quoting: BreKel
      That Anaheim trade may be the worst I have seen in a long time. Clayton stoner? For your top scoring forward and a top 4 defense at 50% retained?
      I think he meant to add in Lindholms rights.


      Still you're making a hole to fill another.
      10 juin 2016 à 14 h 33
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 177
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: BreKel
      Quoting: BruinsGuyFYI
      Quoting: BreKel
      That Anaheim trade may be the worst I have seen in a long time. Clayton stoner? For your top scoring forward and a top 4 defense at 50% retained?
      I think he meant to add in Lindholms rights.

      Still you're making a hole to fill another.
      not really, I have a ton of confidance both Vesey and Marchand end up with 20 something goals next year.
      10 juin 2016 à 16 h 1
      #6
      BreKel
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 3,537
      Mentions "j'aime": 460
      Quoting: BruinsGuyFYI
      Quoting: BreKel
      Quoting: BruinsGuyFYI
      Quoting: BreKel
      That Anaheim trade may be the worst I have seen in a long time. Clayton stoner? For your top scoring forward and a top 4 defense at 50% retained?
      I think he meant to add in Lindholms rights.

      Still you're making a hole to fill another.
      not really, I have a ton of confidance both Vesey and Marchand end up with 20 something goals next year.


      A lot of confidence in a kid (who hasn't signed here) and hasn't played an NHL game yet. I like Vesey too, but let's hold off on those types expectations for him. Marchand just put up 37. He's good for at least 25-30+ goals a year. I don't understand why people are so willing to move the only guy on the team that can score. Marchand is an untouchable.
      10 juin 2016 à 16 h 19
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 177
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: BreKel
      Quoting: BruinsGuyFYI
      Quoting: BreKel
      Quoting: BruinsGuyFYI
      Quoting: BreKel
      That Anaheim trade may be the worst I have seen in a long time. Clayton stoner? For your top scoring forward and a top 4 defense at 50% retained?
      I think he meant to add in Lindholms rights.

      Still you're making a hole to fill another.
      not really, I have a ton of confidance both Vesey and Marchand end up with 20 something goals next year.


      A lot of confidence in a kid (who hasn't signed here) and hasn't played an NHL game yet. I like Vesey too, but let's hold off on those types expectations for him. Marchand just put up 37. He's good for at least 25-30+ goals a year. I don't understand why people are so willing to move the only guy on the team that can score. Marchand is an untouchable.
      He put up an inflated total. He scored the most luck goals hes ever had in a season, then add in the 5 empty net goals and you have a lot of casual fans believeing hes better than he actually is. He's totally tradeable and especially so if he wants more than Bergeron. Burgy is the Alpha of that line while Marchy is a complimentary player teams don't plan for.
      10 juin 2016 à 16 h 20
      #8
      Démarrer sujet
      flannel
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2016
      Messages: 1
      Mentions "j'aime": 0
      this was simply a way to illustrate how to fix the cluster* that is the Bruins D. If you want elite talent (Lindholm) you've got to give up something that isn't junk. While I think this is too aggressive for the Bruins FO to pursue, and I agree, I'd be surprised if the moved Marchand, you have a highly mobile D with a legit #1, a number 3, 4 and 5.

      This also leaves the Bruins with 5.6M in cap space - they could also retain 1M on Stoner and trade him to get another 2.2M in cap - so they could chase an Okposo, retain Eriksson, etc.

      Anaheim and Winnipeg both have internal salary caps that they must work around. Especially if Winnipeg wants to extend Trouba long-term, and bring back Andrew Ladd - they need to free up cap space to enable them to do so. Anaheim as a plethora of young D, but they need to clear cap space to retain people and/or bring others in.

      I do expect Vatrano and Pastrnak to have around 50 goals total. Vesey, I'm pretty confidant he will sign, but I wouldn't expect more than 35 points in a rookie year, we'll see. Long time to wait to sign him (8/15). There's an outside chance Danton Heinen could make the club, too.

      I doubt that's the 4th line, but just plugging guys in to take up roster spots/fill cap voids.

      I don't expect others to like it. It's a) incomplete and b) simply an illustration of a more mobile, better, D.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage