Even extended UFAs?

I think "extended UFA" qualifies as a UFA signed in 2019 off-season, but the UFA rights can be swapped around, and the no trade until November 1st, 2019 applies only AFTER the UFA has been signed this off-season.

I just want to confirm that Lindblom is expansion exempt. Here is what Rico researched and said...

“I can't find anything definitive but it does look like an ATO does not count as an SPC. An ATO in the AHL is an AHL SPC with a limit of 25 games and is not transferable to the NHL. Reading between the lines, lindblom has 2 professional seasons and is therefore exempt.
If you're still unsure, have the BOG double check and confirm his status, but it's my personal belief that he is exempt.”

We also need clarification on the Fucale trade. CF has him listed as a RFA but Rico thinks he should be a UFA. Gronk has said we go by what the site says. Is this the case?

Why would he be a UFA? He's 23.

Because he wasn’t qualified last year by MTL

But he can be qualified this year, right? Did they sign him after not qualifying him? I don't think that changes this year, does it? Maybe it does, but I don't think so.

I have no clue. That’s why I asked.

I know my pick conditions, but it just hit me that others may not, and thought I should mention it BEFORE someone makes a mess (might even be too late already).

To view conditions, open your team's CapFriendly page (not your GM Game page) and review the picks with an asterisk.
Picks with conditions that have not yet been finalized, should not be traded. A conditional 3rd which could become a 2nd, means you can't move either the 2nd or the 3rd until the condition has been met or not.

I think you can move it like the Sharks did IRL with their 2019 and 2020 1st round picks. Ottawa got the 2019 1st if Buffalo got the 2020 1st. Ottawa got the 2020 1st if Buffalo got the 2019 1st.

That depends on the conditions. Some conditions specify which team's pick must be transferred, some specify the better (or worse) of multiple picks, some leave multiple picks as options (2019 or 2020, for example), and some simply do not specify ("a" 2019 1st is either insufficient information available, or at the discretion of one of the teams).

*Conditions: Pick upgrades to a 2019 1st round pick if Sharks re-sign Kane. If Sharks don't make the playoffs in 2019, then Sharks have the option to retain the 2019 1st and Buffalo receives a 2020 first round pick instead.
*Conditions: Ottawa receives Sharks 2019 1st round pick if Sharks do not make the playoffs. If Sharks make the playoffs, Ottawa receives Sharks 2020 1st.
*Result: Sharks made the 2019 playoffs, Ottawa receives Sharks 2020 1st round pick

What happened here, was separate conditions attached to the same pick. Not multiple picks which could change based on conditions.
If SJ did not make the playoffs, they had the option of giving Buffalo their 2020 1st round pick, which would allow them to satisfy the other condition attached to their 2019 1st and send it to Ottawa.
If they did make the playoffs, Buffalo receives the 2019 1st and Ottawa receives the 2020 1st.

Let's say Houston trades Connor McDonald to Kansas City for a conditional 5th round pick. If McDonald scores 10 or more goals for Kansas City, the 5th round pick turns into a 4th round pick.

Houston then trades this conditional pick to Cleveland for Nikita Kilcherov. Conditions being: If McDonald scores 10 or more goals for Kansas City, Cleveland receives Kansas City's 4th round pick. Otherwise, Cleveland receives Kansas City's 5th round pick. It's basically saying whichever pick Kansas City gives up to Houston goes to Cleveland in the Kilcherov trade.

Is this allowed?

What is this, school word problems?
All I'm saying is don't put draft picks in a position where you've traded one which you are supposed to transfer based on conditions, before verifying whether those conditions have been met.
So if you trade a 3rd, but that 3rd can become a 2nd, don't trade your 2nd, because everyone gets screwed if that condition is fulfilled.
The picks people currently own, may have IRL conditions attached to them already. Make sure you are aware of what those conditions are before you start trading those picks.

Toronto has only one conditional pick in 2020, its the EDM 7th round pick. The link is found here.

My problem is that those conditions are labeled "conditions unknown", and therefore do not restrict me as the v4 GM of TOR from dealing that pick out in any potential trade offers.

Just make sure each GM in v4 checks up any picks from the CapFriendly related team pages with any asterisks * next to them and clicks those picks to find out what conditions might be tied into our GM v4 Game from before May 10th, 2019.

The conditions were that Nolan beset sign with EDM which he did. Therefore it is Torontos pick

Side news: anyone know when a full list of QBC picks are supposed to be done.

I've got a question for the BOG on the QBC expansion draft and the trade freeze combined.

If QBC have made all their selections, and have provided the BOG their final team roster as a submission with trades completed and included before May 27, 2019, could the trade freeze be lifted for teams all other teams to resume business and begin posting official trades on that day instead?

Thanks BOG for considering this as an option.

We're not rushing QBC but we'll gladly open up the trade market as soon as they're done with their selections

Good morning BOG people!

Is there any news on the reversal vote of the Gallagher trade? Any thoughts on the new offer that we suggested to AK?

Your decision and input is greatly appreciated.

nothing to see here

do you have a rough estimate when the auto-pick list will be published?

Here is the list: https://t.co/Nna25bx648

Where is this list from? Cozens ahead of Kakko?

that my friend, is a question for @A_K

thanks. little confused on why we aren't using DraftSite for our auto-pick list. I thought that was the standard for auto-pick lists in our game?

Who's list even is that?