SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2015 2016 NRD's NYR

Créé par: NHL_RumorsDaily
Équipe: 2015-16 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 30 mai 2015
Publié: 30 mai 2015
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
*Updated 9:27pm* Fixed Carl Hagelin's salary to 3.15m





*Updated 10:29pm* Voided signing of Lindback and Called up Skapski to save cap. Sent down Lindberg. Unneeded with Draisaitl in lineup
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
800 000 $
5 500 000 $
1 100 000 $
1 250 000 $
3 150 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
3 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Draisaitl, Leon
  2. Yakupov, Nail
Détails additionnels:
2017 5th RD Conditional Pick
2.
NYR
    2015 5th RD Draft Choice
    Rachats de contrats
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2171 400 000 $63 613 333 $125 000 $5 470 000 $7 786 667 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    2 475 000 $2 475 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 6
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    900 000 $900 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
    C
    UFA - 1
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 4
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    4 700 000 $4 700 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    663 333 $663 333 $ (Bonis de performance145 000 $$145K)
    G
    UFA - 2
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    30 mai 2015 à 21 h 10
    #1
    Lehner
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 11
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    Dont think that trade is realistic, maybe one of yak or drai. definitely not both.
    30 mai 2015 à 21 h 12
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 2
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    Few Notes:

    1. No way is Hagelin going to get a paycut from last year

    2. There is no way Sather is breaking up our top 3 D. We have three strengths as a team which has driven this team to go deep in playoffs. 1. Henrik 2. Our top 3 Def which can shut down two lines. 3. Our speed on wings.

    I hate Sather as a GM, but he does have strengths as a GM, one being getting rid of awful contracts. This could be the hardest yet but he somehow needs to get rid of Dan Boyle's contract.

    I also believe MSL will come back for one more season, play on a vet min deal, with incentives, which will allow Sather to stretch cap.

    3. I do love Franson, this team has lacked a heavy shot from point. Boyle used to have it, but not anymore.
    30 mai 2015 à 21 h 29
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    @NHLRumorsDaily
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 6
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    Quoting: arab27
    Few Notes:

    1. No way is Hagelin going to get a paycut from last year

    2. There is no way Sather is breaking up our top 3 D. We have three strengths as a team which has driven this team to go deep in playoffs. 1. Henrik 2. Our top 3 Def which can shut down two lines. 3. Our speed on wings.

    I hate Sather as a GM, but he does have strengths as a GM, one being getting rid of awful contracts. This could be the hardest yet but he somehow needs to get rid of Dan Boyle's contract.

    I also believe MSL will come back for one more season, play on a vet min deal, with incentives, which will allow Sather to stretch cap.

    3. I do love Franson, this team has lacked a heavy shot from point. Boyle used to have it, but not anymore.


    I fixed Hagelins paycut, a mistake on my part. and I can see Sather sacrificing Danny G. As much as I hate to say it
    30 mai 2015 à 21 h 31
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    @NHLRumorsDaily
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 6
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    Quoting: Lehner
    Dont think that trade is realistic, maybe one of yak or drai. definitely not both.
    I feel Edmonton would add in Drai if Girardi is in play. Gives them the top 2 pairing D they've been yearning for IMO
    31 mai 2015 à 14 h 51
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 3,566
    Mentions "j'aime": 611
    That Edmonton trade is absolutely horrible for the Oilers. It makes as much sense as Marincin + Scrivens for Stepan and Nash.
    31 mai 2015 à 15 h 51
    #6
    SJsharksBlogger
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 80
    Mentions "j'aime": 17
    Quoting: NHL_RumorsDaily
    Quoting: Lehner
    Dont think that trade is realistic, maybe one of yak or drai. definitely not both.
    I feel Edmonton would add in Drai if Girardi is in play. Gives them the top 2 pairing D they've been yearning for IMO


    Giraldi???

    Try Mcdonagh bud. There is zero chance they trade those two for that package.

    Talbot/Giraldi is not getting you two high first round pick prospects. Talbot will get you no more than a 2nd round pick or a 3rd and a B prospect. It is a buyers market for goalies. Tons of available options. Talbot is a good goalie, but the market for him is low.
    Cdn_bacon a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage