SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Muzzin Gagner

Créé par: hawksfan88
Équipe: 2018-19 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 5 déc. 2018
Publié: 5 déc. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Apparently after 10 years of trying to get Sam Gagner, Stan is still trying. We also appear to be scouting Los Angeles. If that's true, the only names I would like to see coming would be Muzzin/Martinez/Toffoli but I'd assume that Muzzin/Martinez is the target.

While Gagner has really been playing bottom 6 roles and even playing in the AHL lately, Stan is I'm sure thinking he would immediately step up his game alongside Kane which is probably partially true. I also wouldn't mind getting Martinez/Muzzin as long as it's not an overpayment. We do have a plethora of young D so as long as it's not Boqvist, Jokiharju, Beadun I'd be alright. Something along the lines of Forsling + Krys + Picks??

I would say moves like this would definitely help out our team this year, still not a true contender though. So is it worth it to add that much 2019-2020 salary and give up some young pieces? probably not
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Gagner, Sam (900 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
With the retained salary, this becomes a straight up wash salary wise and essentially a swap of a struggling winger for a struggling dman. You could probably add a mid round pick on either side but seems fair enough.
2.
LAK
  1. Forsling, Gustav
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
Chad Krys

LA gets a pair of young dmen for the future, one of which can play NHL now. Plus a 2nd round pick.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de BOS
Logo de ARI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $69 935 961 $1 232 500 $6 882 500 $9 564 039 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 935 000 $1 935 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
650 000 $650 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 775 000 $2 775 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 déc. 2018 à 12 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 800
Mentions "j'aime": 142
I don’t want Gagner on Chicago. And he would not go 2nd line
5 déc. 2018 à 12 h 37
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 255
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Who knows what it takes to make the LA trade happen, but I like that D corps much more.
5 déc. 2018 à 13 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
I like everything about this except Gagner on the 2nd line. He would be a 4th-line flex option if we were to get him. I would also throw in another defenseman like Tuulola so that they retain closer to 1.5 mil.
5 déc. 2018 à 15 h 3
#4
Démarrer sujet
hawksfan88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 271
Mentions "j'aime": 37
Quoting: Logan03
I don’t want Gagner on Chicago. And he would not go 2nd line


Quoting: Petrock83
I like everything about this except Gagner on the 2nd line. He would be a 4th-line flex option if we were to get him. I would also throw in another defenseman like Tuulola so that they retain closer to 1.5 mil.


Obviously Gagner is not a 2nd liner but Stan is not going to trade for him for "depth" we have plenty of bottom 6 depth already. Stan is probably thinking that Gagner and Kane put up monster numbers a decade ago in the OHL and see if they still have chemistry. I'm not opposed to taking a look at him. But while he's clearly not a top 6 guy, this is more about finding a guy to play with Kane
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage