SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Does this get Calgary into the top 10?

Créé par: SmugTkachuk
Équipe: 2018-19 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 20 juin 2018
Publié: 20 juin 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
2975 000 $
2875 000 $
3950 000 $
1875 000 $
31 375 000 $
2900 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. Lazar, Curtis
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
NCAA - Adam Fox
2.
TOR
  1. Stone, Michael (750 000 $ retained)
3.
CGY
  1. Hossa, Marián
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (CHI)
CHI
  1. Brodie, TJ
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
RFA - Jon Gilles

This trade is only made if the Flames see a guy they want in the top 5 slip down to 8.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2019
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CAR
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2380 000 000 $61 067 143 $0 $1 782 500 $18 932 857 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 5
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 6
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
875 000 $875 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 4
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 2
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
UFA - 2
975 000 $975 000 $
G
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 juin 2018 à 14 h 41
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 841
Mentions "j'aime": 211
Hawks won't make that deal for the 8th overall pick.
20 juin 2018 à 14 h 48
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: bluedemon5
Hawks won't make that deal for the 8th overall pick.


Fair enough, I think that is what I would cap my offer at though, I don't think I would throw Hamilton instead of Brodie just because I think Gio will decline eventually and then if we didn't have Hamilton we would be in a desperate search for a bonafide #1 Dman. And the Krug trade would be dependent on Brodie being shipped out.
bluedemon5 a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2018 à 15 h 3
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 841
Mentions "j'aime": 211
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Fair enough, I think that is what I would cap my offer at though, I don't think I would throw Hamilton instead of Brodie just because I think Gio will decline eventually and then if we didn't have Hamilton we would be in a desperate search for a bonafide #1 Dman. And the Krug trade would be dependent on Brodie being shipped out.


I think Brodie would be a good fit for the Blackhawks but not for a top 10 pick. I think they're looking more into a RHD anyways. We have plenty of young wingers that could be available though.
SmugTkachuk a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2018 à 15 h 9
#4
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: bluedemon5
I think Brodie would be a good fit for the Blackhawks but not for a top 10 pick. I think they're looking more into a RHD anyways. We have plenty of young wingers that could be available though.


Good point! I like to always add about Brodie that if you are looking at his best years he was on the right side. He is a top two D man if your coach lets him play on his off side. If Calgary was looking for a winger from CHI for Brodie I would assume it's Saad. There is potential here!
bluedemon5 a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2018 à 17 h 1
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: bluedemon5
Hawks won't make that deal for the 8th overall pick.


That's a great deal for Chicago. They get a very good D, 2nd rounder and a great goalie prospect, PLUS massive Cap relief for a higher 1st rounder and a fourth. Very good deal for them that would have to happen on the floor.
20 juin 2018 à 17 h 3
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 841
Mentions "j'aime": 211
Quoting: cberg
That's a great deal for Chicago. They get a very good D, 2nd rounder and a great goalie prospect, PLUS massive Cap relief for a higher 1st rounder and a fourth. Very good deal for them that would have to happen on the floor.


The Hawks could get wayyyyy more for the 8th overall pick. If this was Hamilton then it might be different but not for a 3rd of 4th defensemen. Hossa isn't a huge burden at the moment for the Hawks. They'll move him to Carolina, Ottawa, or Arizona before too long. If this package was for the Nashville first rounder then I think they would consider it.
20 juin 2018 à 17 h 4
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 27
The Boston deal makes no sense, why would the Flames do that? They have excess D already and have no need for a small, offensive D, no matter that deal is way lopsided as it is. No thanks.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage