SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

CAR and PHI, my favs, make a big swap

Créé par: jgraf96
Équipe: 2018-19 Flyers de Philadelphie
Date de création initiale: 25 avr. 2018
Publié: 25 avr. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 750 000 $
43 750 000 $
Transactions
PHI
  1. Faulk, Justin
  2. Williams, Justin
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
Rights to E. Lindholm
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de CAR
Logo de NJD
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2020
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2021
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2275 000 000 $55 883 333 $0 $4 827 500 $19 116 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 137 500 $4 137 500 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 4
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
C
UFA - 4
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
C, AD
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 6
3 975 000 $3 975 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
962 500 $962 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
680 833 $680 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AD
UFA - 1
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
G
RFA - 3
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
2 345 000 $2 345 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 avr. 2018 à 15 h 25
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 221
Mentions "j'aime": 30
I think CAR accepts that without thinking...and philly fans cry themselves to sleep over the horrible deal
25 avr. 2018 à 16 h 40
#2
Démarrer sujet
J
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: sidsoul88
I think CAR accepts that without thinking...and philly fans cry themselves to sleep over the horrible deal


It solidifies Philadelphia’s middle-6 and top-4 at basically the cost of one player. Voracek is a huge loss, and maybe I’m underestimating his star power, but I think the return is there.
25 avr. 2018 à 16 h 43
#3
ChytilMania
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,327
Mentions "j'aime": 294
The idea of trading offense for defense is smart but instead I would take someone like Slavin or Pesce who are both younger and have more potential. Also Voracek is one of the best play makers in the league so I don’t see why your want to trade him. Instead you can move Simmonds or even Konecny ( I know he’s younger and is great but he isn’t as good as Voracek who is imo the best passer in the game and I’m a Rangers fan)
25 avr. 2018 à 16 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 221
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: jgraf96
It solidifies Philadelphia’s middle-6 and top-4 at basically the cost of one player. Voracek is a huge loss, and maybe I’m underestimating his star power, but I think the return is there.


Quoting: rladda
The idea of trading offense for defense is smart but instead I would take someone like Slavin or Pesce who are both younger and have more potential. Also Voracek is one of the best play makers in the league so I don’t see why your want to trade him. Instead you can move Simmonds or even Konecny ( I know he’s younger and is great but he isn’t as good as Voracek who is imo the best passer in the game and I’m a Rangers fan)


Also a Rangers fan, Voracek is too good and i don't think Williams and Lindholm make up for that. Sure they help PHI and Faulk is nice, but yall have Ghost on PP1 and Provorov on PP2 so no room for Faulk. Faulk is also a defensive liability. I think it's not enough value. I agree with rladda that Simmonds would be the better option.
ChytilMania a aimé ceci.
25 avr. 2018 à 16 h 59
#5
Démarrer sujet
J
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: sidsoul88
Also a Rangers fan, Voracek is too good and i don't think Williams and Lindholm make up for that. Sure they help PHI and Faulk is nice, but yall have Ghost on PP1 and Provorov on PP2 so no room for Faulk. Faulk is also a defensive liability. I think it's not enough value. I agree with rladda that Simmonds would be the better option.


If you ask me, there’s no way CAR pulls the trigger on this if Simmer is the centerpiece. They regard Lindholm and Faulk quite highly.
25 avr. 2018 à 17 h 50
#6
ChytilMania
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,327
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: jgraf96
If you ask me, there’s no way CAR pulls the trigger on this if Simmer is the centerpiece. They regard Lindholm and Faulk quite highly.

You’re probably right but philly can always add a round pick or a good prospect to even things out. My point is that trading Voracek would simply be the wrong decision
26 avr. 2018 à 0 h 43
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 426
Mentions "j'aime": 84
If we are trading Voracek I want Slavin or Pesce who are both younger and much better defensively than Faulk is.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage