Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 249
Mentions "j'aime": 28
I may have misspoke to say Sanheim is a low tier prospect but my point is Chychurn is already a regular NHLer who was drafted in the top ten and compared to Ekblad saying he could play right out of juniors. By contrast Sanheim has been riding the pine after playing a few seasons in the AHL; and while I agree Hak is an idiot, other NHL teams will see a player who even if the coach didn’t like him wasn’t good enough to beat out MacDonald and Manning for a bottom line spot. Going forward I would say Sanheim has potential to be a top 4 Dman just by what he’s done. He’s not as physical as Hagg and his work in the zone/ defensively has been spotty at times. Chychurn averages over 20 mins of Time on the Ice already. It’s like saying you would trade Provy for Sanheim. And even if your saying the ceiling on Chychurn is equal to the ceiling on Sanheim (which I doubt), Chychurn is already more developed. The other element of the trade is a pure salary dump of Lehtera. This means that your saying Sanheim is worth Chychurn and enough to pay a guy who should be scratched every game, even if we’re paying him 4.7 mil. It won’t work for Arizona.