SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trades/Signings to upgrade top 6

Créé par: ChiHawks34
Équipe: 2018-19 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 23 nov. 2017
Publié: 23 nov. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The scary part here is even with a 5m cap rise instead of 7m, the hawks could fit the cap hits of james neal, pacio, Carlson, and resign most of the depth if a seabrook trade happens. With 7m in extra cap space, the hawks would still have almost 3m to make more moves if necessary.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 000 000 $
21 250 000 $
2975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 750 000 $
67 000 000 $
45 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2019 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Seabrook, Brent
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
2.
MTL
    Anisimov, Alexander Fortin, 2019 1st 2020 3rd.
    3.
    MTL
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2019
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de ANA
    2020
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2021
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2282 000 000 $71 196 795 $1 232 500 $982 500 $10 803 205 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 5
    4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    975 000 $975 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 8
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    872 500 $872 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    750 000 $750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    650 000 $650 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    24 nov. 2017 à 0 h 59
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2017
    Messages: 294
    Mentions "j'aime": 12
    Seabrook blocks the trade to Arizona. Even if he did Waive you are not giving Arizona enough to eat that contract.
    For some reason you've traded amisinov but kept him in the lineup.
    Last thing I would like to say is the top 6 isn't the hawks biggest concern its the back end that needs help first. Any money being spent should be on the defence.
    24 nov. 2017 à 1 h 26
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    ChiHawks34
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2017
    Messages: 820
    Mentions "j'aime": 117
    Quoting: CM10
    Seabrook blocks the trade to Arizona. Even if he did Waive you are not giving Arizona enough to eat that contract.
    For some reason you've traded amisinov but kept him in the lineup.
    Last thing I would like to say is the top 6 isn't the hawks biggest concern its the back end that needs help first. Any money being spent should be on the defence.


    i kept him on the line up because its more a show that the hawks could spend around 10m in cap on the top 6 if they wanted to. Debrincat will be a lock in top 6 if not by the end of this year, next year, so the hawks could spend 6-7m on top 6 then have that extra 3-4m to do whatever they wanted even if seabrook isn't moved. Though i think he will be moved if not at arizona then somewhere else with some retained salary. It shows the hawks have more than enough cap space to make moves, keep their depth together and get better in whatever position they feel they need to improve most.
    24 nov. 2017 à 2 h 58
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 2,933
    Mentions "j'aime": 362
    the scary part is you think seabrook can be traded.
    24 nov. 2017 à 9 h 55
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 292
    Mentions "j'aime": 24
    Honestly Brent is a great player with a bad contract, he'd be a fantastic number 3 on a lot of teams.
    24 nov. 2017 à 10 h 3
    #5
    Stars
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 775
    Mentions "j'aime": 62
    Wait, you traded Anisimov to MTL for Pacioretty.

    Why is he in the 2nd line?
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage