SalarySwishSalarySwish

Upgrading Assets

Créé par: EmailTruck
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 6 juin 2024
Publié: 6 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I figure that Davidson is going to (1) try to improve the team without overpaying for long-term contracts, (2) prioritize upgrading picks over acquiring more, and (3) save cap space for splashes next offseason. This leaves the Hawks with ~$5.25 million cap space for in-season maneuvers and ~$28 million in cap space for next offseason to resign Kurashev and Slaggert and make a big signing, and maintains full flexibility in 2026-2027 when the team enters a window of contention.

I have Korchinski starting the season in Rockford, but likely returning to the NHL with one of Del Mastro and Kaiser being sent down midseason. I don't see any of the forward prospects in Rockford making the NHL roster this year, but there are plenty of trade candidates (with retention) in the forward ranks who can be moved to make space as needed.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 150 000 $
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
25 250 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Demidov, Ivan
3850 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Mikheyev, Ilya
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Top 10 protected in 2025/2026; unprotected in 2027
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (CHI)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Mikheyev dump valued as a mid-3rd based on 2024 standings; potentially higher if Canucks are worse or Hawks are better next year
2.
CHI
  1. Trouba, Jacob
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Top-10 protected in 2026 and 2027; unprotected in 2028
NYR
  1. Raddysh, Taylor [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
3.
PIT
  1. Roos, Filip [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Or future considerations or a late round pick either way
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2487 700 000 $80 001 667 $0 $5 732 500 $7 698 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance900 000 $$900K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 037 500 $4 037 500 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

6 juin à 14 h 20
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 6,536
Mentions "j'aime": 2,806
Trouba probably doesn’t waive
6 juin à 14 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 233
Quoting: Rags21
Trouba probably doesn’t waive


Each of Trouba, Smith, and Mikheyev have partial no-move clauses. I really don't know how likely any of them would be to have Chicago on their no-move list, but it's absolutely possible that any or all of these trades are nixed by the players.
6 juin à 14 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 6,536
Mentions "j'aime": 2,806
Quoting: EmailTruck
Each of Trouba, Smith, and Mikheyev have partial no-move clauses. I really don't know how likely any of them would be to have Chicago on their no-move list, but it's absolutely possible that any or all of these trades are nixed by the players.


My thinking for Trouba is: all 7 Canadian teams are on it followed by the bottom 8 US teams in standings
6 juin à 15 h 24
#4
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,168
Mentions "j'aime": 4,838
The only one of those proposals that makes any kind of sense is the Pittsburgh deal.

In both the Mikheyev and Trouba proposals the only thing the Hawks should be sending back is FC.
PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 15 h 48
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 233
Quoting: Snowhawk18
The only one of those proposals that makes any kind of sense is the Pittsburgh deal.

In both the Mikheyev and Trouba proposals the only thing the Hawks should be sending back is FC.


The way I'm looking at it, the going rate is roughly a 2nd round pick for a cap hit of $5,000,000 for a player that's going to be bought out. Mikheyev has $9.5 million left across two years but should average 30-40 points per year-- I'm saying he's worth slightly more than a 2nd round pick. It's a poor return for the Hawks if the Canucks' pick is 28 and the Hawks' is 34 next year, but I'm expecting the Canucks to be worse and the Hawks to be better, and with a 1st round exit from the Canucks there's a clear upside for the Hawks. I don't have a great idea how good Trouba is, but the other trades I've seen on this website seem to imply that he'd be about even value at $5-6 million per year-- I'm saying that with no retention he's worth about a 2nd round pick. I'd rather the Rangers trade be more similar the Canucks, but I'm expecting the 2026 2nd round picks to be nearer the middle of the round than the start and the Rangers' 2026 1st to be closer to the 20th pick. I'd love to get a 1st back straight up for each of Mikheyev and Trouba, but I don't think that would happen.
Voir tout