realistic off season

Nope it's not especially for wild. Wild aren't going to trade a good young player like greenway to vegas for 4th round prospect who hasn't played 1 game in AHL .

That 2nd round pick doesn't mean much. Nope, wild rather keep greenway

Your title should be changed to unrealistic because wild can do better

thanks for the feedback. considering they might lose him for nothing I view it as a fair trade.

Well, they might doesn't mean they will. this type of reasoning is a faulty reasoning. Every team will lose one player, not just wild

So which is it? Are wild only team losing dumba, greenway, etc??? Because according to people on here, wild are only team losing someone

I'm so confused by this comment lol. the point of the trade was because they rather get something for him rather than losing him for nothing.

Yeah, & I am telling you wild aren't going to give him up just because they could lose him especially to vegas

Wild can also lose dumba, or soucy

So respectfully, no. Wild rather lose 1 player than make a trade for reasoning that maybe something can happen